6 comments
Am curious how this compares perf/quality wise with FastVideo's FastH3 trim/omni which I have been using pretty well with a basic laptop NVidia card (e.g. 5s 480p video w/ audio in 90s).
This is very cool, I wish they would make quality+time comparisons between the various quantisations though
Yeah this is only meaningful if you can compare quality at least.<p>Otherwise, it's just like saying: we compressed a JPEG file to 50% of its size using some compression level and we didn't check what it looks like.
Seconded, I'd like to see a head to head comparison to see how the quant loks vs the original
Their product page has sample videos: <a href="https://www.videorebirth.com/lp/hyperflow-flash" rel="nofollow">https://www.videorebirth.com/lp/hyperflow-flash</a>
I see references to comfyui in the readme. Is that the easiest way to run it? I've always found it a bit cumbersome to use and wish I had something like a simple CLI tool to use it like llama.cpp. Perhaps that's not possible with a video diffusion model?
I use stable diffusion cpp with a LLM driving it using CLI. It’s been the quickest way for me to run new diffusion models and require near zero skills but the results come out great.
They also have references to stable-diffusion.cpp, which is probably the closest analogue to llama.cpp in this space
[flagged]
[flagged]