Just me or is this a bit cynical? Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the gameplay is fun and everything. Just the concept makes me really uneasy, especially as I have a friend who's house was destroyed recently in war...
I think it's fun, not cynical at all. I'm sure if my close one was shot, I'd be uneasy playing call of duty, and so on.<p>I'm sorry for your friend.
As someone who was personally a victim of a violate car accident when very young, causing permanent facial scarring; I give everyone permission to play GTA, Wreckfest and Burnout 3.<p>I would hope my friends would never use me to say otherwise.
I'm surprised by the comments defending this, I also think it's in poor taste. I wouldn't say cynical, in my opinion it's worse than that, it's too real.
If it makes you feel any better tanks are almost useless now in modern war.<p>They can't at all compete with some off the shelf kids toy costing $30 with a HEAT round attached. The cost differential here with a 35 million euro tank is beyond pale.
This kind of outrage takes away from things that are actually distasteful and cynical. Conflating unproblematic things with actual harmful things is a you problem. Policing tone, while people are actually dying out there, is more cynical that this game. The only outcome here is there you guys feel better about yourself.
It's not really outrage, I just think it's in poor taste. Unproblematic is a matter of opinion, which we're each entitled to.
Having a negative opinion is not policing. If you want to spend your free time simulating destruction, that is really your thing. It's common entertainment. It doesn't mean others can't share a different perspective on it.
I don't think that quite makes sense. Sometimes it's useful to point out/shame unsettling things that happen in society, even if it doesn't directly cause harm.
I both think this is allowed to exist in addition to finding this tasteless.
It sounds like you yourself are outraged and policing how people feel about this game?
You're on HN, where people celebrate YC companies that in "defense". The majority of people in our networks would bomb a house if it completed their next round. Let's not pretend that we're surprised people defend this.
NO FUN ALLOWED
Fun is very much allowed. But people are also allowed to question if one person’s fun is another person’s pain.<p>Like, if a bunch of kids caught a stray cat, tied him up, and started shouting in his ears and laughing, would you stop them? And if they complained “no fun allowed”, would you think that was fair? What about if there was a video game in which you beat to a pulp deepfake representations of your friends and family? Do you not agree it would be reasonable for some people to find that in bad taste, including those who have suffered from domestic violence in real life?<p>You may say that this is just a game, but media affects people too. There are thousands of games where you can shoot at fictional infrastructure, is there really that much to gain from destroying representations of real buildings?
Not just you. With a fourth of the world in an actual war, it doesn’t sit well with many of us.<p>That said, whoever made it might not be thinking about that. A kid could vibecode a game these days. I wouldn’t hold it against them.<p>Moreover, many AAA games glamorize war (Call of Duty, Far Cry, Battlefield…) or crime (GTA, Red Dead Redemption, Payday, Hitman…).
I wouldn't say so, since shooting at mini tanks and buildings that look like cardboard on a gray street map doesn't seem connected to real events.<p>That said, I did not find the game fun. It was laggy, UI elements seemed a bit sloppy and cut off, and the purpose of buttons wasn't very clear. Also, I saw mostly brown tiles rather than buildings, maybe it was already all destroyed.
I think it's rather poor taste to code something like this. Usually when buildings or other things are destroyed in movies or even a game, it's to tell some kind of story. In a way telling the story brings the justification because the destruction in the story is usually counterbalanced by someone trying to stop it, which brings the story to the level of good being done.<p>This is just wanton destruction and has nothing good in it.
I mean, technically, <i>Blast Corps</i> had a story (you needed to pave the way for a runaway nuclear missle to not crash and explode or something), but then you'd get medals for thoroughly destroying everything anyway, because really it was about knocking down buildings and the "story" was a silly pretense. And it was great.<p><i>Rampage</i> and its sequels were pretty much also just "destroy buildings, the game," and also great.<p>My kids enjoy building with tiles and then knocking it down.<p>If you've ever shot a gun or detonated some explosives in real life, you'll know that's fun too despite these things being used to hurt people also.
I think it’s the particular design choice of leaving emoji on the rubble you destroyed, with options like a skull, fire and so on.<p>The Call of Duty series gives a much more detailed view of the battlefield, with a lot more blood, and it doesn’t get a reputation for being cynical because it doesn’t force your hand with a choice that feels like mockery of the situation. This game’s emoji defaults slightly do, whether it was intentional or not.
Almost everything fun doing is going to have a naughty element that's bound to upset somebody.
Reminds me of the kid that got expelled for modelling his school as a Counter Strike map
I had a similar thought.<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50390997">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50390997</a><p>If your friend would be willing to share their thoughts, I’m interested in learning. Of course, if they don’t want to share or you think it would be disrespectful to even ask, don’t. I’m just thinking the perspective of such people should not be ignored.
You are overreacting. Its not cynical.
I'm really sorry about your friend's home. I never meant it that way. It started as just a 3D map that you could drive around. Then I added collisions, then a tank, and it grew into a game from there. None of it came from anything in real life. But I understand why it feels uneasy when war is real for people you know.
[flagged]
Fun idea but horribly laggy. Just driving down a street and I would get bounced back constantly and make very little progress. Ping was showing up as much as 5000ms
sorry, that's on me! Way more people showed up than I expected and the server couldn't keep up. When it falls behind it drops your inputs and yanks your tank back, so that's the bouncing. I found the culprit (collision checks looking at way too many buildings)
as an active osm contributor and community member and io games enjoyer i love this.<p>if the author is readin this by any chance pretty please improve the attribution placement, projects like this are whats bringin interested people in to help us build a better open map for everyone <3
Neat idea, however in my home town it quickly gets stuck on the streets, maybe the collision testing isn't that great.
I can't load the thing, but the idea reminds me of the trope of adolescents playing early FPSes and making maps based on their homes and schools, for good or for bad…
5 minute respawn timer after being shot is a bit excessive
Fair point, Just cut it to 30 seconds.
yeah i just started and someone shot me. Now i gotta wait 5mins?
For US addresses, can you include the state in the search? It's common for the same city name to be reused. For example: Dallas North Carolina (small town) vs Dallas Texas (metropolis)
I want to try this but every time I try to join either from my mobile or desktop (both on WiFi), I get this error: "That callsign belongs to another player. Pick a different one." that comes from the Railway-hosted wss://worldstrike.fun/ws<p>Here's a full response with headers:<p>HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
Connection: Upgrade
Sec-Websocket-Accept: GeKaJfsfiYd9s2vROz7kMU3RDWA=
Sec-Websocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate; server_no_context_takeover; client_no_context_takeover
server: railway-hikari
Upgrade: websocket
X-Railway-Request-Id: UA8DKXk_TKiusD2aYqVb7A
x-hikari-trace: lhr1.7mfs
x-railway-edge: lhr1<p>{"type":"error","message":"That callsign belongs to another player. Pick a different one."}
Connection Closed: 1005
I can't see my tank because the status box takes up most of the screen?
This thing just crashed my whole DE. My GPU reset. Haven't had one like that in years.
Sorry! It's WebGL, so it shouldn't be able to do that. Which browser, OS and GPU? I'd like to track it down.
This happens on every shitty vibe coded 3D webapp that makes it onto HN. I don't know what the fuck they're feeding these bots.
It keeps saying "Your connection dropped. Let’s get you back out there." after a few seconds, then returns me to my spawn point. I don't see any bad HTTP status codes in the network tab<p>Can you make it a little more resilient on Wifi + 4G? I would really like to try this, it seems fun<p>Also, incorporating elevation data would also be really cool
Nice! Are tanks spawned at the last picked location? I picked my hometown as I wanted to demolish a friend's house, and I was surprised to find 2 tanks there (it's a random small city in Europe).<p>I also have the bug where it keeps respawning me to the starting point after ~30 seconds
Anyone else immediately think of San Diego?
I guess I wasn't the first to have the idea to flatten the White House...<p>Bye bye, ballroom!
of all the fun things you could do based on OpenStreetMap choosing to destroy cities says a lot about the values of our times
I don't get it, how is it possible people are in my local town? or is this more populr than this thread? fun stuff nevertheless.
Real people, no bots :) If you join with the default option, you're dropped near where other players are already fighting, so you'll usually find company
Is there a way to change viewing angle?
Would love to see some stats on what people decide to destroy …
Saw no buildings. Fired at the next tank.
Hi there! My name is Ender, and I'd love to play this game.
Similar in spirit: <a href="https://kaijumietz.de/" rel="nofollow">https://kaijumietz.de/</a>
I am genuinely interested in the opinions of people who live in or fled war-torn countries. Would they find this in poor taste? That it trivialises ongoing struggles? Have they tried looking into their own cities? Do they not care? Do they think this is somehow useful? Does it surface memories? Are they more bothered by the execution?<p>Of course, we’d need more than one or two data points. If you know someone (or are you yourself) in that situation, I’d welcome learning your thoughts. No judgement or ulterior motive, just looking to understand another perspective.<p>Edit: And, of course, the downvotes are already coming. Don’t know why I bother with this community anymore. Call for exploiting and exterminating other people (I’m not talking about this submission) and you are celebrated; but try to be empathetic and learn about others, no sirree, can’t have that, that’s a grave offence to the great hacker blowhards who frequent the big AI News network. This community has become putrid.
it's missing interpolation on position estimation.
It would be more fun if I could pick a city. Knocking down Trump's white house would be a kick.
[flagged]
[dead]
[flagged]