Possibly silly question, but is this aimed at Go repos only because of some structural reason, or because this was the author's intention?<p>I can see this approach being useful across non-Go repositories too.
I like this! It would be great if it was a hosted solution where I could just add any repository to the URL, like <a href="https://pkg.go.dev/" rel="nofollow">https://pkg.go.dev/</a> does for the godocs.
Whats the validation strategy that you used for this? I run a similar project and I found that golden repos were needed to prevent drift. Have you stress tested this to find any limits? I compared my go work to ctags and treesitter for proof of functions found and list precision and recall.
> Every Go package in github.com/peterretief/yggstore, what it builds on, and the functions in each of its files. Tests are left out.<p>it's a cool idea, but reads super sloppy, sorry. There is literally no effort in this.
It's ironic you didn't put any effort into calling out the lack of effort put in the project. Btw, the project README is fine, this is AIslop hysteria.
It is just the idea, for me to navigate my project code, free to use and change
would be nice if there was a picture of the final result in the README.md
Interesting! It would be cool to see this as a cli tool to allow agents to efficiently inspect codebases
This is really cool. I could see adding this alongside the godocs to my open source projects.
[dead]