6 comments

  • phil-pickering4 minutes ago
    You should be able to create and use templates for TextEdit using the Stationery Pad feature which comes built-in to macOS:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.apple.com&#x2F;en-ie&#x2F;guide&#x2F;mac-help&#x2F;mchlp1341&#x2F;mac" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.apple.com&#x2F;en-ie&#x2F;guide&#x2F;mac-help&#x2F;mchlp1341&#x2F;mac</a>
  • gampleman1 hour ago
    Also Pages also has a fairly decent print design mode. Sure, it can&#x27;t compete with something like Indesign in feature parity, but I find it pretty useful to do posters, booklets, flyers and the like. It&#x27;s free and fairly intuitive to use.
  • steve197728 minutes ago
    TextEdit has its roots in OPENSTEP, where it was used as kind of a demo application of the text views IIRC. It even came with source code, as did Chess by the way.<p>So I guess a comparison between TextEdit and Pages doesn&#x27;t make too much maybe, they&#x27;re really different things.
    • mananaysiempre9 minutes ago
      &gt; TextEdit [...] was used as kind of a demo application of the text views IIRC. even came with source code, as did Chess by the way.<p>On the other side of the fence, WordPad initially came with source code as well, and was essentially a demo app for the rich edit control as well as the criminally underused text converters[1].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.malsmith.net&#x2F;wincvt&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.malsmith.net&#x2F;wincvt&#x2F;</a>
  • ch_sm1 hour ago
    Pages is an underrated Word Processor. It has the lessons of 30 years of development and experimentation of WYSIWYG editors distilled and applied in a tight little package.
  • esFran33 minutes ago
    Give me KDE Kate, or give me death!
  • carlos-cute1 day ago
    [flagged]