Wholeheartedly agree. It's sad to slowly see the bitrot in my own bookmarks, trying to pull up important resources or media from only a few years ago only to hit a 404 or domain placeholder. And many times there is nothing on Archive.org or similar.<p>That ArchiveWeb extension looks excellent for custom captures. Picking the pages and elements you want during capture is a great feature.<p>For quicker one-offs, SingleFile gives you a single HTML with all the media of a page: <a href="https://www.getsinglefile.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.getsinglefile.com</a><p>If you're making archiving a more involved part of your workflow, I highly recommend ArchiveBox. It can save pretty much every type of file from everywhere, in almost every format you can imagine, while building a searchable index of the archives. Been using it successfully for many years: <a href="https://archivebox.io" rel="nofollow">https://archivebox.io</a>
I have recently started using hister [0] this index’s everything I read and allows me to half remember bits and have a LLM find it.<p>[0] <a href="https://hister.org/" rel="nofollow">https://hister.org/</a>
Can vouch for Hister! In the fairly short time I've been using it, I already had a few sites disappearing or changing content and hister kept the juicy information accessible.<p>It was painless to set up and quick to use when needed, too.<p>I also use Singlefile and Obsidian Web Clipper a lot, but Hister has been great and is now a first-class citizen in my system. It helps it works passively for those things that don't look important when you read them, but become relevant later.
By default it only keeps the latest copy of sites so I'm not sure how that prevents replacing with 404?
I used ArchiveBox for years. It's really good. The self-hosting and maintenance gets annoying after a while though.<p>Link rot really bothers me and I want people to get into archiving web pages so that eventually there will be a decentralized mirror of the unslopped web sitting on people's hard-drives, ready to share whenever someone needs it. So, I made a worse version of ArchiveBox ( <a href="https://memoryhole.app" rel="nofollow">https://memoryhole.app</a> ). My philosophy is that, if people see how it is easy to start archiving and how useful it is, then they'll keep it up with SingleFile, or ArchiveBox or anything else.
I've been using Archivebox for years also, but it recent years it started to have multiple issues. My queues are full of pages that failed to scan, and it's been several versions since I actually had anything new there.<p>I did small amount of troubleshooting a few times with no resolution, but now I'm thinking of switching my thought process. Maybe something like a "web clipper" is much better, as complex SPA pages often fail to archive well anyway. And I should focus on content itself, not the page. That SingleFile extension fits well here as well.<p>Did you run into similar dilemmas at some point?
It's funny - I actually went through a similar transition and also realized it was a little too heavy-duty for my personal workflow.<p>At this point I'm using Linkding (self-hosted bookmarks, which has an archive function) paired with Singlefile (which integrates with Linkding) which locally captures and uploads. For larger, or multi-page, captures I still fire off an Archivebox command. I run into blocks occasionally, but it also just feels like the open web is becoming less and less open in general.
> At this point I'm using Linkding (self-hosted bookmarks, which has an archive function) paired with Singlefile (which integrates with Linkding) which locally captures and uploads.<p>I second this workflow, exactly what I switched to from Archivebox. Linkding has a built-in "create HTML snapshot" feature but the Singlefile browser extension works much better.
SingleFile is great for single pages. All the tweaking I do is enable or disable saving scripts, and it works for >90% of webpages. Output being a single file (heh) simplifies things enormously, there’s no hierarchy or folders to deal with - hard to imagine your saved files not loading or breaking in some way as long as the original capture works.
singleFile is great, and the extention works on fennec/waterfox on android as well (not sure about firefox mobile)<p>another one i use when i only need to save the text of a webpage is markdownload, which formats the page using markdown<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/markdownload" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/markdownload</a>
I haven't tried archivebox, but self-hosted <a href="https://karakeep.com/" rel="nofollow">https://karakeep.com/</a> has been working well for me. When the server-side parsing fails I'll fallback to using SingleFile in my browser which then forwards it to my Karakeep instance.
I'm using Linkding hooked up with SingleFile to bookmark+archive all important pages. Highly recommend! <a href="https://linkding.link/archiving/#using-the-singlefile-browser-extension" rel="nofollow">https://linkding.link/archiving/#using-the-singlefile-browse...</a>
I’ve been going over the art that I’ve saved in the past 15+ years and it’s quite sad when I go look for the original source of an image and find out that it’s completely gone from the original website. No indication that they’re on some other website, at least by reverse image searching it. Definitely has made me glad that I’ve been hoarding these images on my hard drives, with the total count being somewhere over 300k at the moment. I think the oldest ones have now been migrated across four different computers. Kinda sad for everyone else since they can’t see them anymore though.<p>Haven’t started saving web pages yet, but I definitely should though. My home server has some tens of terabytes to spare, so that’s at least not an issue. Been eyeing these comments to find a good self-hosted solution.
Avg bookmark is valid for 5 yrs.<p>My bookmarks file is a disastrous graveyard as I have 20 yrs’ old ones…<p>And as a publisher I don’t link fresh sites (don’t even mention Netlify, Lovable, Vercel…) … Vannevar Bush would be surprised how his Xanadu evolved.
Archivebox annoys me because (as far as I remember) it doesn't have any options for capturing a webpage on your end and uploading it to your self-hosted Archivebox instance. With numerous sites moving to Cloudflare to mitigate AI agent crawling, it makes it really hard (or outright impossible) to capture a page because it wants to do it server side.
On MacOS, I use my own built app called HEAP which lets me archive in various formats locally (full page image, pdf, markdown, html, and webarchive) via a single right click of the menu bar button:<p><a href="https://apps.apple.com/ca/app/heap-website-full-page-image/id6747727830?mt=12">https://apps.apple.com/ca/app/heap-website-full-page-image/i...</a><p>Disclosure: I am the developer.
[flagged]
In 5 years, cloud LLMs may have largely replaced the open Internet as a source of information, with centralized control and ability to rewrite the past.<p>Please, please buy books and keep them in good condition, and please archive websites with important information (assuming it's legal in your jurisdiction). There are still plenty of excellent sites and blogs around from the 2000s and even earlier, but they won't be there forever. Ironically, coding agents have made archival much easier -- I've always found problems with using pre-written tools, but Claude or Qwen make it trivial to download, test, and archive sites on your local.
What are the legal implications of something like this? What if the site has copyrighted images or videos?
This is timely for me, since a web forum I care about went offline, and I simultaneously discovered the Wayback Machine for whatever reason never crawled most of it. I asked Claude to try to put together a static site of what could be salvaged from various archives and other sources, but as miraculous as what AI can do these days, it can't restore data that is truly gone - so what it was able to salvage is better than nothing but still missing a lot.
I know that feel, bro. Wayback Machine is very spotty, unfortunately. websites that existed for years often have only a few pages archived.<p>the worst thing I saw was a website that was dead for over a decade but fully archived get hit with "Sorry. This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine" because of robots.txt set by whoever is squatting the domain <i>now</i>. I've managed, by some miracle, find an archive of its content on some random forum. bookmarked it. by the time I'd remembered about the bookmark, that random forum was dead and the link was not archived :(
I wonder if Tigsource will end up this way
I remember an old niche website I saw some 20 years ago. The whole content was dynamically loaded. If you disabled javascript, you were greeted with a static page that accused you of theft. Attempting to select and copy text or right click resulted in a popup window saying the same.<p>Nowadays you can just slap your site behind Cloudflare, I guess.
Nowadays you can open the dev tools before loading the site and then select or copy whatever you like in it.<p>But yeah some websites were really special. I remember one made by some Microsoft fan which was completely unusable outside Internet Explorer. It was like a static picture in any other browser, clicking links & buttons just didn't do anything.
I learned this the hard way by getting too casual with Angelfire keeping an old website running for 20 years after I stopped updating it.<p>It had lots of photos that I hand-scanned from printed film, back in the day when it took a good bit of time to scan photos manually.<p>The site was a running joke, where I would open it to show people that it still existed... until it didn't, and I couldn't find my backup of all of the photos. The archive sites have the 'bones' of the website, but not the photos. It was easily avoidable, which is why it is painful.
Back it up, or even better, re-implement it to look better than the original!<p>I did this for the category theory / math website called ncatlab / nlab<p><a href="https://github.com/taliesinb/nlab" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/taliesinb/nlab</a>
I've started to use a custom bookmarklet for this. If I like something I read or watched, I 'pick' it with the bookmarklet, add my thoughts, and categorise it. The script then checks if it's on the Internet Archive, if not it tries to archive the site, and then save it to my public repo, which then my personal website shows under /library.<p>Repo link, if anyone is interested: <a href="https://github.com/karthikeyankc/picks" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/karthikeyankc/picks</a>
I recently spent a few days trying to figure out and discover my old websites and things from the early 2000s on the web archive. I hadn't realised my memory had gone quite so bad, but it was revitalising to find some of what I'd forgotten. So much of what I do remember is long dead and missing, sadly.<p>I thought it might be rose-tinted glasses, thinking that the earlier internet was better, but spending time retracing my teenage steps made me even more certain that it was indeed better. So many derpy little websites made by nerds, so many fun games and websites that weren't preying on vulnerable people, and everything spread out across many places - not centralised in the hands of large corporations. I've been using LLMs to have fun recreating concepts from that time, like my own forum software, as some sort of anti-progress. It's been fun.
Video backups are also important too as they can be easily censored when within a walled garden.<p>Interestingly, "there is no single direct 1:1 Linux clone of NirSoft’s VideoCacheView that automatically monitors browser cache folders via a graphical interface. Released 2007." <a href="https://videocacheview.en.lo4d.com/windows" rel="nofollow">https://videocacheview.en.lo4d.com/windows</a> (Gemini)
Bonus suggestion: get that internet archive extension for your browser that automatically sends every page you visit to the IA (if you're ok with the privacy side).<p>You don't have to worry about having your copy easily accessible, and as a bonus it's also available for everyone else in the world.
I've backed up lots of CS courses, you know those old html websites written by the professors by hand. `wget -mkpnp` works very well for those. Even years after finishing uni, I've used those websites for studying for interviews.
Too bad most of them are now gone.
Agree with this. I started down learning more about archival while I was adding it to my own thing [1]. I wish there was more of an existing toolset for diffing archivals as well - what changed is just as interesting as what is there. Equally, something I kind of think is lacking in WARC/WACZ is exploration of the archives - maybe forensics is too strong a word but it would be nice to have an easier way to explore what you’ve captured and understand the data in different dimensions.<p>I’ve supported some of this in my own tool, ZShot - capture in sqlite, Quicklook extensions for WARC and WACZ. Just trying to make archiving easy and interpretable.<p>It’s also been interesting to see people use archival but for different uses: Kiwix [2] showed up in my reading recently, “archival but for offline internet”, which I’m kind of fascinated by.<p>[1]: <a href="https://zshot-app.com/for/archivists/" rel="nofollow">https://zshot-app.com/for/archivists/</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://get.kiwix.org/en/" rel="nofollow">https://get.kiwix.org/en/</a>
Or don’t. Lots of things I loved in the past and spent time backing up and backing up the backups that after 15-25 years I realized was a waste of time. Thought I had plans for them but never looked at them. Never referred to them. Finially realized I never was and got rid of the final backups
one of the great tragedies of my life was when <a href="https://buthowdoitknow.com/" rel="nofollow">https://buthowdoitknow.com/</a> went offline, taking the visual emulator with it<p>i managed to reconstruct (and then improve) it with an LLM:<p><a href="https://scott-cpu.cs.montana.edu/" rel="nofollow">https://scott-cpu.cs.montana.edu/</a>
I guess I am one of the dinosaurs here if I still use HTTrack for such things?<p><a href="https://www.httrack.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.httrack.com/</a>
this is why i built linkwarden: <a href="https://linkwarden.app" rel="nofollow">https://linkwarden.app</a><p>(p.s. it's open source!)
(p.s. <i>here's</i> the open source! <a href="https://github.com/linkwarden/linkwarden" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/linkwarden/linkwarden</a> )
I am usually against shameless self promotion but this is actually pretty cool
(Even more importantly, it’s libre software!)
Agree, I backed up Fravia's website back in the day, and it is fun to come back to.
Thought I’d see this noted in comments. Monolith is another solid option:
<a href="https://github.com/Y2Z/monolith" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Y2Z/monolith</a>
Yup! especially as we are using various ai platforms and ai agents.
I created my own artifact aggregator service which hosts the artifacts. I run it on oracle cloud for free and back them up on my gmail drive. <a href="https://simple-host.com" rel="nofollow">https://simple-host.com</a>, and you can back
the last source of truth are forums.. but not reddit... if it has a CEO it will rot and enshitify.<p>I'm talking about forums... the bmw forum for your old car... the motorcycle forum for the enthusiast of the SV650... those places are full of anecdotes, people talking, lending a hand to another person... being humans and care...<p>Which is what social media is/should/was about, is what internet is about before the enshitification happened... I would vote to have this ID associated to you via check of your local goverment issued id and ONLY UPPON VERIFICATION of you being using that you can log and read and use those websites without tracking you (Yes 10,000 ifs where this is secure, handled in a confidential matter, the whole tech is not to track that you are doing something... but that a human is behind that, no api, no robot, no adds, no nothing... just the old school forum where you can go, talk, submit a photo... where someone who wanted to spend time to write something did it, SO WE CAN ENSURE TWO THINGS, A HUMAN IS THERE, AND NO FVK!NG CEO WILL ENSHITIFY IT, no to track people, but to know that a person is interacting there)<p>But because "empathy is the weakness" and shareholder value...
> the last source of truth are forums.. but not reddit... if it has a CEO it will rot and enshitify.<p>Quick gripe-anecdote that occurred (again) just now: I have a technical question, the search-engine says it was discussed in a Reddit thread, so I go to Reddit, giving them my traffic and eyeballs just like they want... but the information is impossible to find because "new" Reddit hides/collapses 90% of the discussion by default and there's no way to tell which branch has what I need without manually clicking them all. (And them some of them will reload the entire page, erasing progress.)<p>So I have no sympathy for their whining about scraping when they spent already years making it painful for actual live organic humans to find anything.<p>> Which is what social media is/should/was about<p>I think our two imperfect approaches here are:<p>1. Webs of trust, in some way that resists crowds of sockpuppets.<p>2. Some kind or proof of stake. Proof of anonymous-humanity is hard, proof of unique-humanity is creepy spy stuff, but "proof if you ban me it'll at least hurt a little" might be easier to achieve.
"1. Webs of trust, in some way that resists crowds of sockpuppets." we are already there... is just that the frog soup had a very steady hand at rising the temperature.<p>The other option is to use the X402 protocol to pay, every time you access a page you pay in cpu to calculate some shitcoin.<p>For a person, is just trading the time spent loading and displaying ads for paying the creator for their work.<p>But if you are scrapping you are now paying with cpu and electricity to see things and content creators are being paid.
This is why I started using Obsidian Web Clipper. There is SOME work to learn it and set it up, but the small amount of upfront work will pay for years to come. And the folder itself is backed by Dropbox, so I don't have to worry about losing it all forever.
> the folder itself is backed by Dropbox, so I don't have to worry about losing it all forever.<p>History and this very thread should show you how this is a naive statement.
I also regularly use the web clipper specifically for this reason - most of my conversations can be around articles I read online, and instead of googling for the article I have it referenced right in my journal. I find myself regularly upset that I didn't save old articles from years ago because I didn't have this system
Zotero (Desktop) backs up web pages using SingleFile under the hood.
I agree sorta, but maybe its best to just let things go.
I downloaded a ton of image in the days following 9/11, and burned them to a CD.<p>I wonder how many other people have archives like that...?
<a href="https://webvault.wanno.dev/" rel="nofollow">https://webvault.wanno.dev/</a>
Is <a href="https://pinboard.in" rel="nofollow">https://pinboard.in</a> still a thing? I used to be a subscriber but completely forgot about it.
I've tried almost all the popular and many not-popular options to no avail. Does anybody know of an archiver of any variety (Firefox extension, or CLI give-it-a-url, or anything else) that can archive a modern Reddit page with the voting (e.g. I can later see if I up- or down-voted a post)?
Seems like an extension an LLM should easily be able to make in a few minutes. Start with asking an LLM to use a Chrome MCP to see what it can do and if its feasible.
Do the WebScrapBook and SingleFile extensions not work?
Something I have been doing is saving PDFs of interesting articles. I actually go back for some of them. Organization is always an issue but mostly desktop search finds it.
So, this is a fine idea and all, but aren't the "piss off AI bot" mitigations going to throw a wrench into folks wanting to back up a website?<p>I guess the web plugins could ideally get around it, but what about the CLI and app solutions?<p>I know yt-dlp has gone to great lengths to work this problem.
I scrape daily. YouTube, archive,org (sadly getting harder and harder since you have to "checkout" books), worldradiohistory.com…<p>(Now if hard drives had not become so damn expensive—it's getting harder to be a digital hoarder like myself.)
This has come up for me very recently with the multi-week AO3 outage. I'm not a huge user of that site, but it specifically existed as a comprehensive archive of fanworks and of many prior fanfiction sites that have gone offline. I really respected the Organization for Transformative Works as a non-profit with a very targeted mission of archiving these sorts of works and keeping them safe from linkrot and the algorithmic web. Now, after a security incident (which I am assuming is related to the recent LLM-driven discoveries of unpatched vulns in open source hosting software), the whole archive is offline for the next few weeks.<p>I'd always assumed that OTW would keep AO3 online until the end of time. It, somewhat like this site, was one remaining gasp of Web 2.0 before the algorithmic feeds took over.
Any tips on backing up a forum hosted on XenForo?
I did actually. I took a whole day to go to each of my individual saved bookmarks and save the articles as pdf using edge reader mode, sometimes hunting down articles on the way back machine
Recursive wget isn't going to pass Anubis.
I just use a simple approach - print-to-pdf
Have a look at Hister [1], a 'personal web history search engine' which by way of extensions for browsers captures your web history and stores actual page content on your own instance where it can be browsed and searched. It does not store images so if that's what you're mostly interested in it won't work for you. For text is works quite well, maybe sometimes too well since it also stores ephemeral things like HN comment pages unless you tell it not to.<p>[1] <a href="https://github.com/asciimoo/hister/" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/asciimoo/hister/</a>
I tend to save things I read as PDFs because it feels the most robust archival formal for the future.
Over the summer, I had the urge to do this with a few favorite blogs. wget did the trick for static content
Is this not what the internet archive is for?
Another great writeup about backing up websites: <a href="https://gwern.net/archiving" rel="nofollow">https://gwern.net/archiving</a>
Agreed. I won a major (at least within the college) music competition at a local college like two decades ago, and now all traces of it have vanished. If I had the URL I might be able to pull it up on the Internet Archive.
A website I miss was a bullshit corporate jargon generator from Scott Adams. There were 3 columns with corporate jargon. And every time you refreshed the page, a new 3-word phrase would be highlighted. They were the most ridiculous phrases. But one could imagine them being used.
Thanks for the guide ,I never new about this
Yes, and with AI you can even back up the logic behind a website (the back-end), and even generate fake but plausible data to fill it if crawling is too much work.
Obligatory plea: when scraping sites for archive purposes, take care to do so slowly so as to not impose an unfriendly amount of load on the target site. Otherwise you risk becoming part of the problem that is making some take down their resources ATM.
No one uses pinboard to archive pages anymore?
I had a graphing calculator website that had 250K monthly active users, from the logs it seemed mostly schools' math classes in Latin America. It was running on a single AWS EC2 Classic.<p>Ironically, when I started working for AWS, I always felt threatened with sticks and never had space to maintain my own projects. When they deprecated EC2 Classic, my site went down. I didn't get time or mental space to migrate it.<p>Cest la vie I guess.
I did this for a while. I went so far as to built a highly advanced web crawler webapp that was better than the Internet Archive in a lot of ways.<p>But the modern web has made this unreasonable. Every webpage is 99% junk (CSS, JS, HTML structure, tracking pixels, UI images, navigation links, cryptominers (I joke)) and 1% content. You need a smart AI system to pick out the good parts, otherwise you'll quickly find yourself schlepping hundreds of gigs of junk to just preserve your favorite websites.<p>The better idea is: if you love information, back it up. Collect the knowledge from the website, not the website. And then preserve it. Create a free ebook. Or sell it on Amazon kindle. That'll last a lot longer than the website will, and any HTML backup of the site you could possibly make.
I'd suppose most of those junk websites have no value in them, really. The most valuable information in the web is in good ol' (x)html, maybe some css. But something like readability.js [1] can help in filtering the junk around the main info.<p>[1]: <a href="https://github.com/mozilla/readability" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/mozilla/readability</a>
There's also a C rewrite: <a href="https://github.com/eafer/rdrview" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/eafer/rdrview</a>
Same goes for youtube vids
There are far better tools that are not built by this person’s company. Dig around and you’ll find an incredible array. Not everything has to be a sales pitch.
Ages ago (like 2001 or so?) I started building something to automatically archive everything I browse. I used tcpflow (<a href="https://www.circlemud.org/jelson/software/tcpflow/" rel="nofollow">https://www.circlemud.org/jelson/software/tcpflow/</a>). I've seen a fair bit of varions of this idea over the years<p>Then SSL/TLS started getting widespread and I lost focus. Nowadays, I guess you would build it as an extension in the browser.
<a href="https://hister.org/" rel="nofollow">https://hister.org/</a> is a neat website indexing and archival tool.
i'm saddened that <a href="http://macsecret.com/" rel="nofollow">http://macsecret.com/</a> along with /files directory seems to have all be been lost. I has waiting on some storage for the NAS to archive it and it went away before I could back it up.
Print the digital things you want to last.<p>God forbid we have an AI-facilitated full Cyberpunk/.hack-style crash where everything gets wiped, the only things that will survive will be on paper. This is the recommendation I give my friends who are digital artists/writers; have a physical record of your efforts beyond what you want to sell.<p>This is on top of keeping your own digital archives. I'm still haunted by the deviantArt submission I didn't save. The creator took the piece down, then passed away a few years later. A Wayback Machine archive of his userpage with the piece as his featured upload still exists, but the image itself wasn't archived; it just shows a broken image.
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[dead]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[dead]
Look what happened to motherless without backups /s