7 comments

  • polalavik1 hour ago
    Free space pathloss for rf signals is proportional to 1/r^2, absolutely bonkers we can get anything from voyager.
    • rnhmjoj59 minutes ago
      1&#x2F;r² is for an isotropic radiator, but Voyager 1 mounts (thankfully) a high gain directional antenna. The gains seem to be 36dBi or 48dBi, depending on the frequency [1]. This means that when pointed towards Earth, the signal power is actually between 4000 to 63000 times stronger than what that formula would give you. It&#x27;s still tiny, but not as bad as that would suggest.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;space.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;65801&#x2F;what-are-the-parameters-of-the-voyager-high-gain-antenna" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;space.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;65801&#x2F;what-are-the...</a>
      • robotresearcher47 minutes ago
        For clarity, it’s still proportional to 1&#x2F;r², but with a much larger multiplier than one.
    • freedomben1 hour ago
      And with 50 year old tech! I do wonder if humanity will get to a point where we can retrieve the spacecraft at some point in the future (cue Star Trek fantasies)
      • bonzini1 hour ago
        Technically, the receivers need not use 50 years old tech. I am saying that not to be annoying but because I wonder how much that matters.
      • deadnomore55 minutes ago
        I would prefer they just maintain it as long as possible and maybe deploy a proxy for earth that trails behind it indefinitely once it’s finally out of range. Let’s set an unbreakable record.
  • zomtorg1 hour ago
    And the closest known galaxy to the Milky Way, Canis Major Dwarf Galaxy, is just 25,000 light-years away - it&#x27;s almost incomprehensible how vast the universe is!
    • seydor6 minutes ago
      Yeah the only space tech worth pursuing is Wormholes
  • robotresearcher58 minutes ago
    &gt; the spacecraft, in flight since 1977, is cruising at nearly 38,000 mph (61,000 kph) through the vacuum of space,<p>The page takes great pains to explain things, but omits a frame of reference for this speed. I’m guessing it’s sun-relative, but it could be relative to its take-off on Earth. Does anyone know?
    • zimpenfish23 minutes ago
      Checked my bot&#x27;s post from earlier today (taken from NASA&#x27;s data[0]) and it says &quot;Velocity relative to the Earth is about 34 km&#x2F;sec (~77,173 mph); to the Sun about 16 km&#x2F;sec (~37,763 mph.)&quot;<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;eyes.nasa.gov&#x2F;assets&#x2F;dynamic&#x2F;dynamo&#x2F;sc_voyager_1&#x2F;now.json" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;eyes.nasa.gov&#x2F;assets&#x2F;dynamic&#x2F;dynamo&#x2F;sc_voyager_1&#x2F;now...</a>
      • robotresearcher14 minutes ago
        Thanks! And probably the earth relative velocity depends on the time of year :)
  • decoydave21 minutes ago
    So glad voyager has real stuff on it for aliens to see rather than the crap that’s put out today by those with an agenda
  • soniman1 hour ago
    So it is traveling 1&#x2F;18250 the speed of light. That is pretty fast.
  • cineticdaffodil20 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • lunargamma67647 minutes ago
    [flagged]