17 comments

  • TGower4 hours ago
    It still amazes me that the rare shiny rocks humanity has appreciated for thousands of years also turn out to have amazing properties even compared to the synthetic materials we are now capable of creating. It's still the hardest material we have measured. It is the best thermal conductor, even though it's an electrical insulator.
    • numlock866 minutes ago
      &gt; even compared to the synthetic materials we are now capable of creating<p>Aren&#x27;t like almost all commercially used diamonds these days synthetic as well? As far as I can tell, other than just for the sake of them being &quot;natural&quot; or for having weird impurities that add color to them (read as: subjectively better to some people), no one wants&#x2F;needs natural ones anymore.
    • Waterluvian3 hours ago
      I&#x27;ve thought about this at times. How convenient that things seem to work out that way! Though I wonder if it&#x27;s more just a bias. All the very impressive things you can make from the abundant materials have already been made. Like, say, all of life?
      • ACCount392 hours ago
        Blue pigments used to be extremely rare and precious. Then some chemists found the infinite blue glitch.
        • Waterluvian49 minutes ago
          Also the convert energy into aluminum glitch.
    • random339 minutes ago
      Diamonds are crystals, like silicon Nothing wrong with liking shiny rocks, but they aren&#x27;t that rare and we can generally produce them. Materials have properties. Understanding the properties generally gives us leverage to use them in our own benefit.
    • MengerSponge3 hours ago
      It is a very good thermal conductor, but not the best. At low temperatures, copper is better. At very low temperatures, helium is much better.<p>Superfluid helium&#x27;s maximum thermal conductivity is roughly 100x diamond&#x27;s maximum!
      • FuriouslyAdrift29 minutes ago
        They make nice (and expensive) tweeters, too.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.madisoundspeakerstore.com&#x2F;diamond-dome-tweeters&#x2F;seas-excel-t29d001-diamond-dome-tweeter-matched-pair&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.madisoundspeakerstore.com&#x2F;diamond-dome-tweeters&#x2F;...</a>
      • hyperhello3 hours ago
        Neat! At around the temperature of liquid water, it&#x27;s still about five times as good as copper.
      • jcims2 hours ago
        &gt;Superfluid helium&#x27;s maximum thermal conductivity is roughly 100x diamond&#x27;s maximum!<p>Never thought about this before. Would that mean that heat propagates much more quickly? Possibly even approaching the speed of sound of the material?
        • MengerSponge1 hour ago
          Slide 12. Pretty much yeah. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;indico.cern.ch&#x2F;event&#x2F;1541024&#x2F;attachments&#x2F;3055157&#x2F;5401406&#x2F;17_He%20II%20part%201%20Heat%20transfer%20and%20effects.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;indico.cern.ch&#x2F;event&#x2F;1541024&#x2F;attachments&#x2F;3055157&#x2F;540...</a><p>You can kind of isolate the different vibrational modes and their corresponding energy transmission. &quot;Phonons&quot; are basically sound waves (the particle analogue), labeled in figure 2: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nist.gov&#x2F;system&#x2F;files&#x2F;documents&#x2F;2019&#x2F;07&#x2F;12&#x2F;dcs_2019.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nist.gov&#x2F;system&#x2F;files&#x2F;documents&#x2F;2019&#x2F;07&#x2F;12&#x2F;dcs_2...</a>
  • xnx4 hours ago
    Asionometry video on the topic: Why Diamond Transistors Are So Hard (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=NLmd5vL0zmk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=NLmd5vL0zmk</a>)
  • djoldman57 minutes ago
    Forget the transistor for now: that&#x27;s many years&#x2F;decades away.<p>Much more likely to actually get to market is diamond as the heat dissipating substrate.
  • rogerallen37 minutes ago
    Anyone else reminded of that old Crighton book, Congo?
  • ReptileMan12 minutes ago
    &gt;single-crystal diamond wafer<p>Can you hear the sound of DeBeers&#x27; execs melting down? I intend to play it as a white noise while I sleep.
  • Sath523 days ago
    Diamonds are incredibly useful,<p>And logical, now that we can produce them easily enough.<p>This, is one of many uses of the rocks.
  • amelius1 hour ago
    But we need to move to photonics.
  • ginko3 hours ago
    Why do people still think they need to mess with scrolling on their websites?
    • fhdkweig2 hours ago
      Normally, I am the first to complain about broken websites, but it looks fine for me on Firefox on a laptop. Scrolling works normal using up-down arrow keys and dragging on the side scrollbar. There is an unnecessary effect with the 3D diagram, but it doesn&#x27;t interfere with the site. How are you viewing it?
      • peesem1 hour ago
        i think they mean the sort of &quot;inertial&quot; scrolling that the site imposes
        • fhdkweig1 hour ago
          hmm, I&#x27;m not seeing anything that can be described as &quot;inertia&quot;. Not on chromium either. Both of these are on a laptop with dragging the side scrollbars and using the up&#x2F;down arrows on the keyboard.<p>Is this something that is related to a touch screen? I&#x27;m not using a touch screen.
          • hatthew23 minutes ago
            I&#x27;m on a non-touchscreen mac, on firefox with smooth scrolling turned off, and have LinearMouse installed. I tried both trackpad scrolling and mousewheel scrolling. The weird &quot;smooth&quot; scrolling of this website is very jarring to me, and makes it take significantly longer to scroll to where I want to, since the responsiveness went from ~instant to ~.5s and I keep on overshooting.
          • peesem13 minutes ago
            try using a mouse or trackpad, they only seem to intercept pointer input. i also don&#x27;t get affected when dragging the scrollbar or using the arrow keys.
    • cwillu2 hours ago
      I know; at least very little else breaks on the site if you just kill scripts in ublock origin.
  • ezrec4 hours ago
    So... how long does the hydrogen gas layer last before it all seeps out?
    • pfdietz4 hours ago
      I believe these are hydrogen atoms covalently bonded to the carbon atoms on the surface of the diamond.
    • db48x4 hours ago
      The hydrogen is not a gas.
  • paaloeye2 hours ago
    I&#x27;d be surprise if it gets even 1% of SI world dominance after 5 years
  • alberth4 hours ago
    Isn&#x27;t the power consumption needed to create pure&#x2F;no-blemish lab diamonds so great, that this wouldn&#x27;t be feasible to scale.
    • londons_explore4 hours ago
      Lab diamonds are used in huge quantities (ie. By the bucketful ) for making cutting tools like saws and drill bits.<p>I believe the main difficulty is making <i>large</i> and <i>pure</i> diamonds. Making small low purity diamonds is cheap and easy to scale.
    • jpitz4 hours ago
      massive crushing pressure is not the only way to create diamond particles.
      • alberth3 hours ago
        do you mind explaining more
        • dmitrygr3 hours ago
          Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)
  • mitxela3 hours ago
    I still don&#x27;t know how to even make a silicon transistor.
    • genxy3 hours ago
      Make a Point Contact Transistor at home <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=vmotkjMSKnI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=vmotkjMSKnI</a>
      • ForgotMyUUID2 hours ago
        Amazing video, seen it long ago. Spoiler : you will need two diodes to make one.
        • hvs2 hours ago
          Lucky me, I have exactly that many diodes.
  • dude2507114 hours ago
    And no, blog writers, it is not heralding &quot;The Diamond Age&quot;.
    • notarobot12321 minutes ago
      I don&#x27;t know... LLMs, drones, culture wars, nostalgia for monarchical rule - we&#x27;re only really missing the replicators and nano-engineering at this point.
    • Tepix3 hours ago
      Recommended reading: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Diamond_Age" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Diamond_Age</a>
      • db48x3 hours ago
        Way better to recommend reading the book instead of the Wikipedia page about the book.
  • poppafuze2 hours ago
    protons wanna tunnel out.
  • phegler4 hours ago
    Okay this is cool research<p>just one tiny tiny microscopic question...<p>why would someone use diamond wafer costing 1000x more than a silicon wafer??!<p>:)
    • TehCorwiz4 hours ago
      If I&#x27;m reading this correctly it&#x27;s two or threefold. Faster switching times, which both increases max speed and reduces power consumption. Avoids flaws due to silicon doping, presently we add ions to silicon to get P or N type junctions and they&#x27;ve found a way to get P type junctions using &quot;2D Hole Gas&quot; which is basically a thin layer of voids inside the bulk diamond crystal after treatment and avoids a category of flaws that affect silicon yields. Third, and this is speculation, but diamond has a way higher thermal conductivity and lower thermal expansion coefficient, so it can likely withstand higher temps and conduct heat away faster.
      • ktm5j3 hours ago
        I think the better question is: what real world applications need these qualities enough to justify the cost? They mention cooling application, I don&#x27;t buy that anyone is that interested in reducing hotspots in their chips even if it makes them last longer.
        • adrian_b1 hour ago
          For high-voltage applications (like power supplies) or high-power high-frequency applications (like radio transmitters) or high temperature applications (e.g. inside ovens or engines) silicon transistors are already in the process of being completely replaced by silicon carbide or gallium nitride transistors.<p>Despite the fact that those are much more expensive than silicon transistors, they are so much better that their use saves money in other parts of the system in which they are used.<p>Diamond transistors could be even better than SiC and GaN transistors, but there are many difficult technological problems that must be solved until being able to make commercial products.<p>The linked page reports some significant advances, which avoid a source of problems in the past, which were caused by the poor behavior of dopant impurities inside diamond crystals.
        • neerajsi3 hours ago
          I had a family friend working on diamond semiconductors in the 90s. The application at that time was for sensors located in the hot section of a jet engine.
    • hansvm4 hours ago
      &gt; why?<p>&gt;&gt; 50x faster switching<p>It&#x27;s hard to say which applications will benefit the most, but orders of magnitude improvement tend to enable qualitative shifts downstream.<p>Not to mention, 1000x is just the cost right now while the tech is new.
    • ReptileMan7 minutes ago
      The moment it becomes useful its cost will fall down to silicone prices really fast.<p>Right now you can buy 100g of diamonds for low teens in $ from China. Diamonds are produced in enormous quantities as abrasives. And if you do something on large scale you become better at it.<p>So far we haven&#x27;t invested in big monocrystals because there was not much use for them aside from jewelry and probably other small niches. The moment some R&amp;D makes something useful out of them - they will be Jevoned into oblivion.
    • JoeAltmaier1 hour ago
      Possibly on a par with the other exotic materials currently in use.
    • jbms4 hours ago
      The higher the voltages it can handle, the faster it can switch efficiently, and the better the thermal performance, the wider its potential applications in power electronics.
      • luz6663 hours ago
        Hmm, power electronics is often so big, that might need a lot of diamond and could get pricy, who knows.<p>Very low power chips might be the main application, as there is already a huge market (laptops and phones).<p>Or maybe there will be a whole set of new rf chips, profiting from the clock speed.
        • zardo3 hours ago
          Power electronics isn&#x27;t just grid scale equipment.