If the Ai came back to me with a 1600x improvement (still in pgrust readme), I would be highly suspicious of the Ai and the code it wrote<p>The hype factory must grow, I suppose, though I would prefer if the model makers would stop with this "complete the task by any and every means possible" and replace it with "I don't know, I should ask or do more learning"<p>At least they have added a test which looks to make sure the Ai doesn't do it again... if you need this kind of test, something is wrong<p><a href="https://github.com/malisper/pgrust/blob/38634b408dea373f3944006dfbf74d19cbfc409f/crates/gravity/lint/tests/hand_kernels_gone.rs" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/malisper/pgrust/blob/38634b408dea373f3944...</a>
I've noticed it with a lot of random stuff i've been trying<p>I'll tell claude, "write an implementation of an AAC decoder that is 50% faster than ffmpeg"<p>and it will do it! Amazing!<p>Then i tell it "hmm ffmpeg has been really well optimised, are you sure?" and it says "oh, i was running our code directly but running ffmpeg executables with loads of overhead, ffmpeg is actually 50% faster"
If I saw that test in a PR I would not only reject the PR and ask a lot of questions but someone would likely take a forced vacation to deslop their brain.