5 comments

  • jacquesm1 hour ago
    No spoilers here, that is a worthy read, I never saw the turns coming.
  • delichon21 minutes ago
    Conspiracy theorists, unlike normal people, find it easy to believe that people will expend enormous effort to create an illusion. I'd like to take this opportunity to say we told you so.
  • northisup1 hour ago
    I feel like the guardian shouldn't be messing up the oxford comma like that.
    • fsh44 minutes ago
      The Oxford comma is optional according to the Guardian style guide: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;guardian-style-guide-o" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;guardian-style-guide-o</a>
      • northisup21 minutes ago
        So you are saying it _was_ an option and the editor just has bad taste
      • Hugsbox31 minutes ago
        That may be, but it still hurts readability. It also immediately stuck out to me
  • wbeckler1 hour ago
    Proof that nonfiction is wilder than fiction.
    • msdz13 minutes ago
      &gt; nonfiction is wilder than fiction<p>Among other reasons, due to the very much nonfictional consequences you’d expect in a “real world” story like this: Had Graw been convicted&#x2F;stripped of his titles, basically anyone found guilty using evidence from one of his investigations&#x2F;autopsies, even decades later, could attempt to appeal their case and very likely, this would have completely flooded the courts.<p>For this reason, this was a huge case here in Munich, and the prosecutors’ office, from what the public could read in newspapers, was <i>very</i> anxious about the outcome all throughout like 2024 to 2026, IIRC.