4 comments
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograph)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...</a><p>Since they neglect to show you the full, actual photo.
For the record this is the actual photo discussed in the article<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photograph%29" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photogr...</a>
Paywalled :(
I didn't notice. I have JS disabled and it just works.
And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograph)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...</a>
Why not pay for it then?