4 comments

  • lubujackson2 hours ago
    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograph)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...</a><p>Since they neglect to show you the full, actual photo.
    • mlmonkey0 minutes ago
      Why TF would they not show the original??!
  • programd2 hours ago
    For the record this is the actual photo discussed in the article<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photograph%29" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photogr...</a>
  • donbox2 hours ago
    Paywalled :(
    • masfuerte2 hours ago
      I didn&#x27;t notice. I have JS disabled and it just works.
    • embedding-shape2 hours ago
      And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograph)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...</a>
    • colesantiago2 hours ago
      Why not pay for it then?
      • donbox2 hours ago
        I did but not all HN readers can.