5 comments

  • alberth3 hours ago
    I recall dual booting BeOS circa 1999&#x2F;2000, on my 486dx2-66.<p>It was shockingly performant, especially with anything graphical.<p>The difficulty was no apps.<p>Brings back fond memories, nonetheless.
    • majorchord1 hour ago
      I&#x27;m fairly certain that BeOS never supported the 486
    • cosmic_cheese1 hour ago
      It was ridiculously fast on my family’s Dimension 4100 tower, which had a 750Mhz PIII in it. The 98SE install that machine shipped with was glacial in comparison, and though Win2K shrunken the gap dramatically it still wasn’t as fast as BeOS.<p>I was able to find a decent number of apps on BeBits but a lot of stuff was missing.
    • multiplegeorges2 hours ago
      It had a decent number of apps, I drove it as my primary OS for a while.<p>Ended up using Linux, but it was a great OS for its time.
  • YVoyiatzis1 hour ago
    If only for the UI. Back then, all bring white and beige and Windows blue screenofdesthblye. Be OS was pure joy, if only to play around with. Many third-party developers (remember sharewsre) took s liking to the Be aesthetic and ran away with it.
  • hexapus1 hour ago
    I really do need to play with Haiku more.
  • mlmonkey3 hours ago
    &quot;Be&quot; .... now that&#x27;s a blast from the past! :-D
  • ranger_danger2 hours ago
    Now just combine it with Cosmoe[1] so you can run it from Linux too.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pappp.net&#x2F;?p=95060" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pappp.net&#x2F;?p=95060</a>
    • PAPPPmAc2 hours ago
      How odd to come into a thread and find a link to my share-with-note (see name&#x2F;url) instead of a link to the OSNews article it&#x27;s a share of.