This reminds me of "Creators admit Unix, C hoax" (e.g. <a href="https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/unix-hoax.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/unix-hoax.html</a>)<p>> We stopped when we got a clean compile on the following syntax:<p><pre><code> for(;P("\n"),R--;P("|"))for(e=C;e--;P("_"+(*u++/8)%2))P("| "+(*u/4)%2);</code></pre>
<p><pre><code> Object.prototype.message='alert\x281337\x29';Array.prototype.toString=Error.prototype.toString;Error.prepareStackTrace = Function;const x = new Error;x.valueOf=x.stack;+x;
</code></pre>
Well, that's a mouthful! So many years and JavaScript still can do the most amazing, weird, awesome, scary, obscure, and sexy things in the world of coding.
JavaScript is so cursed.
Off topic: This website looks like a ransom note
GPTzero says this entire thing is AI generated for those concerned.
Aha, that's a great reassurance then! ;-)
The irony of using AI to determine if something was written by AI.
What's the purpose of the +x at the end?
The unary plus implicitly converts an expression to a number, which calls `valueOf` for non-primitive values.
I think to implicitly trigger the valueOf function.