15 comments

  • PaulHoule1 minute ago
    Probably the most practical idea Firefox has had to maintain and possibly build up its market share in a long time.
  • nicoburns1 minute ago
    This was needed. A lot of large businesses ban Firefox because they don&#x27;t have these kind of controls. I can&#x27;t test Firefox on my work computer because company policy prevents it being installed. And that kind of thing <i>really</i> hurts Firefox.
  • dzonga0 minutes ago
    this is move that should have been done a long time ago + with a bundled vpn or equivalent of a tailscale in the browser.<p>Mozilla would have made tons of money.
  • Kuyawa13 minutes ago
    Does it block ads like Brave without installing extensions? Tracking is one of the worst plagues of modern browsing so blocking all kinds of tracking and fingerprinting should be the first concern in an enterprise. Nothing should leak to the outside world
    • rockdoe12 minutes ago
      This feature ships in Firefox for a few years IIRC? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;kb&#x2F;enhanced-tracking-protection-firefox-desktop" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;kb&#x2F;enhanced-tracking-prote...</a>
    • tokai9 minutes ago
      If its first concern why would you use a browser that has ben caught injecting affiliate codes?
  • zecg31 minutes ago
    Does this mean they will remove &quot;AI controls&quot; (i.e. a way to completely shut all LLM shit off) from normal Firefox?
    • ashenke16 minutes ago
      They list this as a feature in the submission page.
    • sunaookami23 minutes ago
      No, why would you think that?
      • cowsandmilk9 minutes ago
        The page literally says<p>&gt; AI controls — allow, restrict or disable AI tools<p>So the answer is yes, no need for making up a cynical answer.
        • rockdoe5 minutes ago
          I think that just means <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;firefox&#x2F;ai-controls&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.mozilla.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;firefox&#x2F;ai-controls&#x2F;</a> will be administrator controlled in Enterprise settings. As in, the admin can force-disable all that stuff.
        • llm_nerd3 minutes ago
          Ignoring that a feature page for a tier can include features from other &quot;tiers&quot;, they&#x27;re explicitly describing central governance and configuration of this.<p>So now, the answer is no, no need for reading tea leaves and making stuff up.<p>And I mean, does everyone here know that Firefox is open source?
  • sdcfgy29 minutes ago
    I can&#x27;t think of a single enterprise who I have worked with or know who&#x27;d pay for this when there&#x27;s Chrome or Edge available.
    • ndegruchy23 minutes ago
      There&#x27;s already Island browser that competes in this space. Plenty of companies pay for browser control that goes beyond what the normal policies can provide.
    • lirolero18 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • CodesInChaos39 minutes ago
    No public price information. I wonder how much they charge.
    • InsideOutSanta18 minutes ago
      It&#x27;s enterprise, so the cost is 500k unless you don&#x27;t want to pay so much, then it&#x27;s 50k.
      • KingOfCoders5 minutes ago
        Or the sales rep needs to make their quarterly numbers.
    • boesboes35 minutes ago
      That&#x27;s how you know it&#x27;s enterprise!
    • jqpabc12331 minutes ago
      If you have to ask the question, you&#x27;re probably not going to like the answer.
  • gustavus49 minutes ago
    Now this is the kind of Mozilla project I can get behind it focuses on the browser it gives a potential path for revenue and I practically jumped up and down when they announced their bringing in Thunderbird.<p>Solid props to Mozilla for this one. Good job.
    • stuff4ben13 minutes ago
      Right?!? There&#x27;s a lot of negative sentiment on the comments here on HN but probably from people that don&#x27;t understand locked down corps and other higher-security work environments where these features are needed. Plus not relying on Microsoft&#x2F;Google is always a good thing. I can definitely see this being useful in hospitals, government orgs, etc.
    • kevincox3 minutes ago
      Not only revenue but enterprise users are valuable market share. Think of things like Slack calling which last I checked don&#x27;t work in Firefox unless you spoof the user-agent. More enterprise users will force better Firefox support in a huge variety of websites which will benefit all Firefox users.
  • SuperNinKenDo9 minutes ago
    So much negativity in here. I mean, I get the antipathy toward Mozilla, but they&#x27;re trying to find a way to make the actual browser a revenue stream. Yeah it could skew incentives or something, but unless you believe that you, and everyone you know is ready to start a paid subscription to Firefox Personal tomorrow, it&#x27;s something like this, or more Google deals and pushing &quot;service&quot; integrations.<p>Seriously, this place is so damn negative these days, but not even constructively.
  • s17tnet48 minutes ago
    And yet, still no simple way to self host the their syncserver (syncstorage-rs) without the mozilla account abomination.
    • soco37 minutes ago
      Are you using, or planning to use, the Enterprise version, and feel like this functionality is missing? Or is the complain about the regular release? I&#x27;m asking because I fail to see the link...
  • jqpabc12333 minutes ago
    <i>Firefox Enterprise puts customer privacy, independence and control first.</i><p>Thanks for the open admission that regular Firefox does not.
    • rockdoe9 minutes ago
      Pretty sure that&#x27;s Firefox in contrast to the other alternatives in the Enterprise space.
    • LtWorf2 minutes ago
      &quot;control first&quot; to the IT department instead of the user.
  • 1970-01-014 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • InsidiousWombat34 minutes ago
    &gt; Firefox Enterprise puts customer privacy, independence and control first.<p>So what before came as main advantage of Firefox is now dropped and put behind the paywall?
  • fractalf18 minutes ago
    Once again Mozilla invents stuff noone wants. Its just incredible how an &quot;org&quot; with so much income fails again and again
    • evolve2k6 minutes ago
      They need to try. I also feeling like there’s likley growing demand globally; like they mentioned. A need for greater digital sovereignty.
    • jqpabc1239 minutes ago
      It&#x27;s income they don&#x27;t really earn.<p>Like a rich kid living on daddy&#x27;s money, they&#x27;re somewhat disconnected from the reality that most people exist in.
  • sixhobbits50 minutes ago
    every announcement I see from Mozilla makes me happier that I switched to WaterFox last year and don&#x27;t have to deal with their shit any more
    • auslegung45 minutes ago
      What do you dislike about this announcement?
      • zecg30 minutes ago
        How they list &quot;AI controls — allow, restrict or disable AI tools&quot; which Firefox now has under Enterprise, but not normal version.
        • ashenke18 minutes ago
          There is a AI menu in Firefox where you can disable individual AI features, as well as a single toggle to disable every current and future features.
        • GrinningFool17 minutes ago
          You can already do that in regular firefox. I think in this case, it&#x27;s adding the capability to enable&#x2F;disable via policy at the enterprise level.
        • malfist21 minutes ago
          Firefox does have a setting to disable all AI features. It&#x27;s in your settings: Settings &gt; AI Controls &gt; Block AI Features