7 comments

  • sega_sai8 minutes ago
    I'd rather wish people put effort into LibreOffice. I'd hoped there would be significant improvements there as there is a huge scope of bug/compatibility fixes. But I guess it is not sexy enough.
    • mjr004 minutes ago
      Yeah, this entire saga is really unfortunate. The narrative is really enticing (AI is obsoleting Adobe/Microsoft/other corporate software behemoths!) when the reality is it's a vibe-coded slopware that barely functions, according to anyone who has actually tried it, and there are other FOSS alternatives which are much more stable, mature, and deserve people's attention. I wonder how many people shouting "Claude vibed a Photoshop clone, Adobe is done!!" were even aware Krita or GIMP existed.
    • mikert896 minutes ago
      im willing to bet its easier to generate a new office than it is to fix libreoffice
    • dbg314152 minutes ago
      It is not sexy enough.<p>It has atrocious UX. Crazy bloat from promising to support every one-off file format under the sun for the last 25 years.<p>Trying to get a PR commit committed is like dealing with an entire army of bureaucrats.<p>So I get it would be great (in theory) if people wanted to support this, but at the same time it’s too far behind —- and the team is too entrenched in bad UX decisions, ackward support mandates for obscure systems that in reality nobody ever really used.
  • variety86756 minutes ago
    The media response to this omits the fact that these vibe coded &quot;reverse engineered&quot; apps hardly work and we&#x27;ve had open source alternatives to the Microsoft and Adobe products for years. The narrative they&#x27;re pushing is a frontier model can make a perfect clone of any app, and the reality is it makes a ui that looks somewhat similar but none of the functionality actually works.
  • giancarlostoro1 hour ago
    Yep, I realized this back in February, you can remake basically anything in a drastically shorter span of time with a single frontier model and patience and test thoroughly.
  • 800xl48 minutes ago
    All I see in this article is bunch of ads and something about people arguing on Twitter. Is there a link to the actual project or announcement?
    • NookDavoos46 minutes ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;storytold&#x2F;wordcraft" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;storytold&#x2F;wordcraft</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;storytold&#x2F;gridcraft" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;storytold&#x2F;gridcraft</a>
      • 800xl21 minutes ago
        Thank you kindly!
  • cosmicradiance43 minutes ago
    Internet decentralized the data. Now, AI has decentralized software. Next, we need decentralized AI.
    • zuhsetaqi19 minutes ago
      How is AI currently not decentralized?
      • kylecazar8 minutes ago
        A very small group of companies have the infrastructure required to train and serve a frontier model. They have a stranglehold on the compute&#x2F;resources required for a new participant to break in.<p>And an overwhelming majority of enterprises running AI in production do so via one of two providers.
  • muglug32 minutes ago
    Can these tools withstand Microsoft’s lawyers?
  • Stitch42231 hour ago
    I’d be thoroughly impressed if all the weird quirks of Excel also make the cut.