6 comments

  • soltanov17 minutes ago
    Impressive research, but the countermeasure is fifty years old: adequate shielding. The authors did not find a fundamental flaw in cameras; they found cheap plastic enclosures.
  • Jackobrien34 minutes ago
    This feels very impactful for national security and corporate espionage.
  • rsamtravis1 hour ago
    Okay who can build me one of these?
  • akoboldfrying24 minutes ago
    Really interesting concept! I would not have thought of EMR variation as a usable side channel for this.<p>IIUC, the EMR increases following scene changes (like a light being turned on or off) are a result of the fact that video codecs try hard to compress similar images. So, I speculate that an &quot;extremely bad codec&quot; that simply dumps raw pixels to storage would not produce such variation, and therefore remain undetectable?
  • ranger_danger50 minutes ago
    The speaker in the video was extremely difficult for me to understand but the idea seems quite clever.<p>What I&#x27;m most surprised about is just how well it actually works... I did not think such EM fluctuations would be usably detectable from several meters away... but I suppose this may be moreso due to improper&#x2F;lack of shielding in the first place, which I would think should be easily fixable in most products to mitigate this type of detection.
  • bezusfaphoon26 minutes ago
    phenomenal