2 comments

  • kaszanka28 minutes ago
    Only tangentially related, but knowing that remote attestation and co. will only ever get... &quot;better&quot; fills me with impotent rage like almost nothing else. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lafkon.net&#x2F;tc&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lafkon.net&#x2F;tc&#x2F;</a> (2004) was so very prescient.
  • bawolff2 hours ago
    &gt; C2PA allows for arbitrary &quot;exclusions&quot;. These are byte ranges within the file which are excluded from signature calculations<p>Glad to see we learned from the mistakes of SAML.
    • hedora1 hour ago
      If not this, then how would you propose updating the signed file to contain the signature?<p>&#x2F;s