4 comments

  • kristianp12 minutes ago
    So the CDC 6600 wasn't considered a RISC machine, but a precursor?
  • rbanffy12 hours ago
    Interesting to note the question had the answer all along. How would a modest effort outrun a vast organisation?<p>I never imagined he’d be caught by that mistake.
    • gshubert171 hour ago
      Cray&#x27;s reply was sardonic: &quot;It seems like Mr. Watson has answered his own question.&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;CDC_6600" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;CDC_6600</a>
    • KerrAvon1 hour ago
      He wasn&#x27;t. The CDC 6600 cost IBM some prestige, but it didn&#x27;t put a dent in IBM&#x27;s sales, which were about to skyrocket due to the 360 series.
  • AirPath12 hours ago
    6600
  • bediger40009 hours ago
    I used CDC computers 1986-92. They sucked, and CDC employees could not comprehend that they sucked. They had convinced themselves that their alternate universe was real.
    • kjs335 minutes ago
      What...you didn&#x27;t like NOS&#x2F;VE?<p>The 180&#x2F;990 and the 205 were a pretty good FORTRAN vector machines if that was the problem you wanted to solve; the compiler was quite good. The other 170&#x2F;180s were...for everything else...not so much. That boat had sailed.
    • projectileboy1 hour ago
      That was many, many years after Cray had left. By the 80s, CDC was a shell of its former self.
      • pinewurst39 minutes ago
        One can argue that CDC was obliviously dead by the early 70s.<p>Incompatible, increasingly archaic platforms, the best of those optimal for batch Fortran number crunching, counter to industry growth&#x2F;interest. Organizational metastasis with a next gen platform (Cyber 180 as Star was stillborn - CISC from hell as 2nd system(s) syndrome) only at the end of the decade. Standards, coupled with profound organizational incompetence, ground it to dust. They made really good OEM disk drives for a while but sold the business off to fund their continuing failures.<p>There really needs to be a book that’s not an encomium to William Norris, the Philosopher King of CDC.