35 comments

  • jermaustin13 hours ago
    This is very similar to a project I&#x27;m working on called Sim95 [1]. It has an entire networking stack and visual basic style language. You can host your own websites, chat servers, anything you want, and everything runs over a virtual network (websocket that passes through a relay).<p>It has all the warts of the early internet era: you can program a virus, get people to download it, delete their documents, etc., but it also has a lot of the charm, build a website, chat with strangers, enjoy the lack of facebook (for now until someone builds it).<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sim95.kippy.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sim95.kippy.io&#x2F;</a>
    • Barbing12 minutes ago
      &gt; enjoy the lack of facebook (for now until someone builds it)<p>lol, well done
    • tegiddrone2 hours ago
      I love the concept! It&#x27;s too damn fast though. I want to see my cursor change to busy when waiting for IO
    • samtheprogram30 minutes ago
      Reminds me of YouOS. RIP
    • uean1 hour ago
      I am having way too much fun with this. Thanks!
  • adrianwaj24 minutes ago
    To see sites from back then checkout:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;internethistoryroulette.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;internethistoryroulette.com&#x2F;</a><p>- could be improved whereby the &quot;facts&quot; bubbles change too quickly when turned on.<p>But the idea of placing a random site in an iframe would also work well for Show HN.
  • h4kunamata2 hours ago
    Like others mentioned, the intention is great but too much AI.<p>The icons do not even look remotely close to the dial-up computers.<p>When it disconnects, the reconnection sound is not that at all. Pages load too fast.
    • asciimov1 hour ago
      It’s a nice tribute, but it’s all off. Glad I’m not the only one that knows the modem sounds are off.
  • 1010083 hours ago
    Amazing. When we were all living offline by default, and you had to go online. Now sadly it&#x27;s the opposite.<p>(When did this change? Around 2012?)
    • Telaneo1 hour ago
      I want to say I was online by default earlier, just because I preferred that life to my offline one, but online clearly hadn&#x27;t become &#x27;real life&#x27; yet. Sure, your online life could affect your offline life if you really wanted to make it happen or were just really dumb, but whatever did happen online, it could be brushed off and you could Just™ wash your hands of whatever happened and go and do something else, be that play a different game, browse a different forum, or just log off.<p>Saying that what happens on the internet doesn&#x27;t actually matter nowadays is clearly untrue given even just the most cursory look at the state of the world today.
      • ryandrake1 hour ago
        &gt; Saying that what happens on the internet doesn&#x27;t actually matter nowadays is clearly untrue given even just the most cursory look at the state of the world today.<p>I mean, you can still have this: by 1. Not being Chronically Online and 2. Not worrying so much or watching what is going on online.<p>I’ve managed to keep the separation between “online” and “the real world.” Mostly by just not participating or caring about social media. Online only invades Real Life to the extent that you allow it to.<p>There might be someone over on Instagram “canceling” me right now! I have no idea because I don’t even have an account there.
        • Telaneo1 hour ago
          &gt; I mean, you can still have this: by 1. Not being Chronically Online and 2. Not worrying so much or watching what is going on online.<p>It&#x27;s hard to not attribute the current political climate and all its downwind effects to the online world affecting the real world, and that political climate is affecting me and most people I know, whether I like it or not.<p>I&#x27;m happy for you that it&#x27;s not affecting you.
    • asciimov1 hour ago
      For me it was ‘02 when I moved to college and got that sweet dorm room internet. Some of my friends had aim via text messaging.<p>2012 is a good date for roaming internet, although for the plans and places I’ve been it’s only been the last 3 or so years that roaming internet has been mostly reliable.
    • altermetax3 hours ago
      It changed with smartphones being widespread, so more or less yes, 2012
      • SV_BubbleTime2 hours ago
        2008-2012 was pretty much the height of human civilization.<p>A few bad moves and it’s been quite a subjective fall.
    • y1n03 hours ago
      I was so excited to get road runner, which was an isp from I think time warner, rolling out cable modem service in the early 2000s. I ended up taking a day of vacation just to ensure I was going to be home for the installation window.<p>I don’t remember if my computer at the time had built-in Ethernet or if I had to buy a card.<p>I have been always-online ever since. Wouldn’t have it any other way.<p>But I do still miss the BBS scene.
    • smith70182 hours ago
      I had the first iPhone and distinctly remember telling people &quot;I have the entire internet in my pocket at all times&quot; and people finding it strange. I said &quot;I never really have to log off Facebook or Digg&quot; and my friends didn&#x27;t understand what I meant.
    • to11mtm3 hours ago
      Depends what you mean.<p>There&#x27;s &#x27;offline by default at home&#x27; and &#x27;offline by default overall&#x27;. And it can blur.<p>At least as far as &#x27;offline by default at home&#x27;<p>After (1) my dad retired and bought a brand new fancy PC with some of his unused leave time [0] we wound up getting a dial-up account [1] but sometime around 1998&#x2F;1999 [2] we wound up just getting a secondary phone line; somehow the &#x27;internet&#x27; was so magical to all of us kids or young adults, that it was better for our parent&#x27;s budget to just pay for the extra phone line.<p>Still, it wasn&#x27;t even 56K. Phone lines in my area of Detroit were <i>garbage</i>, if it did connect at 56K it was unstable as hell, 28.8 was the &#x27;reliable&#x27; connection rate, to the point you prayed that was what it connected at.<p>For &#x27;offline overall&#x27; the change can be more blurry, at least in my head. I blame work phones, my PSP&#x27;s WiFi capabilities, and the HTC Dream (released 2008) as the slow shift for me.<p>FWIW, I did enjoy my time on WinPho, where the siloing of the OS and lack of apps, led to a quieter time where my phone was a &#x27;phone&#x27; (and honestly, still a better one at calls, SMS, or driving navigation than than my current one) rather than be tempted by anything online.<p>It&#x27;s weird to think about. Before I went to college, Online (thanks to that dial-up) was an escape from the prison of my home and where I lived. But now Online feels more like a tug away from enjoying life.<p>[0] - P2 266 MHZ 32MB Ram, 2(? might have been 4) GB HDD...<p>[1] - Thanks Diablo for the WorldNet trial and thanks WorldNet for having the practically unlimited usage thing [4]<p>[2] - My oldest Sister was Driving home from College and the engine on the car blew up while I was online. She couldn&#x27;t call for help. [3]<p>[3] - How&#x27;s <i>that</i> for a technology shift though, as far as taking things for granted (i.e. call waiting being seamless and not costing extra per month.)<p>[4] - Except for the bit where when AT&amp;T somehow figured out we were using a &#x27;Share-dial-up-over-LAN&#x27; a few years later, had to switch to Mindspring after dad had me do the research.
      • harikb2 hours ago
        56k dial-up was a special upgrade from US Robotics and only some providers&#x2F;numbers would have that speed. Yeah, as you said, more likely you will end up with 28.8 (based on the live negotiation during the connection setup I think)
  • artyom4 hours ago
    Lovely. 16MB of RAM in the 90s? That&#x27;s luxury. And that dial-up sound always takes me back to happier times. Not unlike normal people&#x27;s childhood songs.
    • nashashmi42 minutes ago
      My 1996 computer had 16 MB of ram and that was a cheap computer (1600$)
    • asciimov1 hour ago
      By the time 56k was out most new entry level machines came with at least 32 megs.
  • VCFundedGenYer4 hours ago
    Vibe coded replica, not the actual OS or programs.<p>Also riddled with inaccuracies.
    • henrychannel3 hours ago
      it&#x27;s like a theme park, the feels - not a museum
    • slater3 hours ago
      <i>and</i> less space than a Nomad, you say?
  • singularity20012 minutes ago
    imagine agents getting that fast
  • excitive55 minutes ago
    This is faster than how I remember
  • illusive40805 hours ago
    Cool, but webpages load too fast.
  • dnewcome5 hours ago
    I just remembered ripterm and <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Remote_Imaging_Protocol" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Remote_Imaging_Protocol</a>
  • thijsvandien3 hours ago
    Hah, it&#x27;s funny how the right environment brings back the same old vibes also in chat.
    • vladdrak59 minutes ago
      Chat was the best part
  • mproud2 hours ago
    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49886195">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49886195</a>
  • uproarchat4 hours ago
    It was fun chatting with you guys :D
    • trinsic21 hour ago
      Wait that was real? I thought it was a bot setup.
      • vladdrak59 minutes ago
        Everyone joining the chat kept asking if we were all real
  • Dwedit3 hours ago
    Who is upvoting this AI-generated nonsense? This is embarrassingly badly made. We have a solitaire game where you cannot drag the cards (and HTML elements move around every time you click), a pinball game with no gap between the flippers, etc etc etc... Nothing about this suggests a human made it.
    • henrychannel3 hours ago
      Its less like a museum, and more like a theme park. It&#x27;s fun
  • t1234s4 hours ago
    Dialing in with Terminate and then using lynx was a real experience.
  • ticulatedspline2 hours ago
    Heh love that it has the star-field screensaver. nice touch.
  • bonyt4 hours ago
    A while back, I set up a server that limits bandwidth through it to roughly max dialup speeds <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dialup.moveything.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dialup.moveything.com&#x2F;</a>. It has some gifs, progressive jpegs that are fun to watch load, and a mirror of xkcd.<p>It uses rate limit buckets per-IP on the server side, applied before SSL termination so it doesn&#x27;t include that overhead. If you open two tabs, they&#x27;ll have to share. If your behind a NAT, you&#x27;ll have to share with your NAT-mates. And, it also has headers saying not to cache anything, so you can continue to enjoy the experience.
  • strikefo4 hours ago
    this is great, but everything loads WAY too fast. It took forever to get anything to load back in the day.
    • aduty4 hours ago
      That&#x27;s likely due to most phone lines not supporting the full 56k speed. In most areas you would be lucky to get 33.6k or 28.8k.
      • stingraycharles4 hours ago
        How is that related to phone lines, and not the dial up access point you’re dialing into?<p>iirc ISDN did require a special phone line, but 56k was fine over regular lines.
        • insaneirish4 hours ago
          &gt; but 56k was fine over regular lines.<p>Sort of. The quality&#x2F;length of your local loop made a difference.<p>And heck, 56k being able to do 56k in the first place was dependent on not having a &quot;regular&quot; line between the ISP and their central office (CO), but rather it being digital, whereas the line from the user to their CO was always analog. Removing a set of digital to analog and analog to digital conversions in the ISP -&gt; user path was what allowed the download speed to reach 56k. Upload was limited to 33.6k because it included an additional set of conversions and introduced more errors, prohibiting the higher speed.<p>This shows getting up to 56k over normal phone lines was indeed tricky.
        • TedDoesntTalk4 hours ago
          56k modems didn’t always negotiate to the full 56k. The handshaking allowed connections at much slower speeds. It depended on the quality of the line. This is the US - we didn’t have ISDN, at least no one I knew had it in 1996.
          • toast03 hours ago
            ISDN was available near me in 1996 (Southern California, Pacific Bell) ... but nobody I knew had it. It cost a lot for the install and monthly, and there was no unlimited local calls tariff like there was for a regular &quot;analog&quot; lane. You&#x27;d have to be pretty serious to want that.
        • toast03 hours ago
          In order to get 56k, you needed to be on a reasonable quality line, and there needed to be an all digital (PRI) connection between the Telco end of your phone line and your ISP.<p>If your line was noisy good luck. If your line had loading coils in the path between the CO and you, that would help your voice calls but make 56k harder to achieve (and was definitely problematic for DSL). Most telephone lines had loading coils every wire mile between the CO and the customer. If you had any of the older wonky stuff telcos used to magic more pairs for customers out of thin air, chances are they wouldn&#x27;t work at 56k.
          • to11mtm3 hours ago
            &gt; If your line was noisy good luck.<p>I remember calling AT&amp;T (or maybe it was SBC by then) about flat out <i>unreliability</i> of our internet connection and the answer was &quot;If you can carry a voice call, we do not care&quot;.<p>FWIW, the problem with our lines did eventually get so bad (although, we finally had cable internet by then) that even a voice call was unusable. Turned out one of the runs (not even the drop to our house) was allowing water to get into the lines. and that was the cause.<p>Will add, after they fixed that problem was when they got really aggressive about marketing DSL...
            • toast03 hours ago
              Word on the street is you could get them to care if (you told them) faxing wouldn&#x27;t work.<p>Nowadays, good luck getting a dial tone. Afaik, no telco actually cares about phones these days.
        • 2muchcoffeeman4 hours ago
          56k modems is an application of Shannon’s Theorem.<p>You only got max speeds where the noise was low enough.
        • nekooooo4 hours ago
          i think they&#x27;re saying the actual speeds you&#x27;d get. i&#x27;d get faster speeds late at night (just me?)<p>sometimes you&#x27;d also reconnect because the handshake got messed up and you&#x27;d connect at 33.6 instead of &#x27;real&#x27; 56k
  • Vaslo5 hours ago
    A lot of people don’t know how cool it felt to dial into the internet or a service like Compuserve or Prodigy and suddenly have this whole world open up to you. Even at 56k.
    • doginasuit4 hours ago
      The patience we had waiting for, uh, pictures to load. The world will never know that kind of dedication again.
  • asxndu4 hours ago
    Why do the websites feel faster than modern internet?
    • johnwalkr2 hours ago
      I fondly remember the text of pages loading almost instantly over dialup, and then over time images popped in. If you were lucky the author included image sizes, so elements didn&#x27;t resize and move around.<p>A modern website has so many round-trip things happening for ads, tracking, and whatever goes on behind the scenes for frameworks and services are used. A lot of this is multiple round trips and blocking so you have to wait to start reading, and if something times out the website fails to load.<p>Between about 2012 and 2020 I had a mobile phone plan that throttled to 100kbps when I ran out of data (which was often). Throughout that time google search and hackernews worked at that speed normally, but in that time period the percentage of websites that fail to ever load changed from about 25% to virtually 100%.
    • cube003 hours ago
      Not needing 30MB of JS probably helps.
  • ajasmin3 hours ago
    That&#x27;s surprisingly well done
    • epcoa3 hours ago
      Bunch of AI slop.
  • riddley5 hours ago
    Fun and cool. The News made me chuckle.
  • russellbeattie5 hours ago
    I&#x27;m sure someone pointed this out in the other thread, but 56kpbs modems essentially didn&#x27;t exist in 1996. They launched at the end of the year, cost a ton, and the manufacturers hadn&#x27;t standardized the speeds, so it really didn&#x27;t matter much as you weren&#x27;t browsing AOL, MSN or Compuserve with it yet.<p>33.6k.rip is a harder domain name to get though, so I get it.
    • toast03 hours ago
      &gt; the manufacturers hadn&#x27;t standardized the speeds<p>Yeah, but there was pretty much two options x2 (usr) and kflex (everyone else). I dunno about AOL and those guys, but for ISPs (and BBSes), they&#x27;d list the speeds with their dial-up numbers, so if you had an x2 modem you&#x27;d try their x2 number, and if you had a kflex modem, you&#x27;d try their kflex number... If you liked your ISP, when they got 56k, you would buy a modem for the tech they picked... if you were choosing a new ISP, you&#x27;d pick one that supported the tech you had.<p>Switching ISPs was pretty easy back then, unless you were using ISP email, but local ISPs might set you up with email forwarding as you&#x27;re leaving. So switching to get a better connection speed was a real thing. You might also switch because your ISP had too many busy signals, or because even though you connected at 56k, their upstream connection was overloaded or had poor routing and you had poor speeds to the rest of the world.
      • russellbeattie1 hour ago
        I agree with all of that - I&#x27;m just saying it must have happened in 1997 as the modems came out too late in 1996 to be particularly useful right away except maybe for your local BBS. I can&#x27;t <i>remember</i> though - 30 years is a long time - so I&#x27;m willing to accept maybe I&#x27;m incorrect. I do remember how expensive the modems were - I don&#x27;t think I ever upgraded, but instead got a DSL line.
    • zerozerotwo4 hours ago
      56k flex!
  • brightball4 hours ago
    Beautiful.<p>Now we just need to bring back BBS’s and the daily turn based games. Legend of the Red Dragon, Usurper, etc.
  • KerrAvon3 hours ago
    Still ugly after all these years. Get a Mac.
    • henrychannel3 hours ago
      here is the mac version <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dialup.rip" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dialup.rip</a>
  • nico2 hours ago
    That chat was fun, 20 people online!<p>Some were asking: a&#x2F;s&#x2F;l hahahaha
  • the_hoffa5 hours ago
    Reminds me of this xkcd comic: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;3227&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;3227&#x2F;</a><p>Select modem mode and just hurt.
  • rvz5 hours ago
    [dupe] see previous conversations in <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49340252">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49340252</a>
  • Xeoncross5 hours ago
    That reminds me. Can we standardize cypress tests to load the website via a restricted speed as one of the tests? Some of of our modern webpages are still slow on the latest iPhone&#x2F;Pixel&#x2F;Samsung over 5G.<p>8,600,743 bytes of assets and frameworks later I&#x27;m finally able to see your contact-us address.
  • braden-lk4 hours ago
    I miss it.
  • onetokeoverthe6 hours ago
    [dead]