It is a lot more honest than I would have expected.<p>"Entering or remaining in the U.S. Capitol without lawful authority, using force, obstructing Congress, or demonstrating inside Capitol buildings is a federal crime. A President encouraging it does not make it legal."
Yeah it even admitted that Biden won the 2020 election. I'm honestly surprised haha.
It also seems to strongly disagree with RFK's public stance of the safety and efficacy of the full series of standard childhood vaccines.
[flagged]
OK, there's a lot of negative comments here, but this is a great idea at a high level. It really is hard to figure out where to do a thing and it's also very easy to get phished. If they can figure out how to help people get all the services they're eligible for that'll be an amazing improvement for the people.
I agree in general, but how do you resolve the problem that people will take the output of the chatbot as authoritative even when it could possibly have errors or miss important nuance? People being lead astray with information from the government could lead to very serious consequences, up to and including imprisonment.<p>Honest question, I had the same issue when my work wanted me to stick a chatbot in front of our HR portal and I never resolved it to my satisfaction.
> but how do you resolve the problem that people will take the output of the chatbot as authoritative even when it could possibly have errors or miss important nuance<p>You have to measure that problem against the status quo, which is that current government websites are very hard to understand and leave people with very little idea of what’s going on.
It can be good without resorting to an LLM.<p>I France service-public.gouv.fr is amazing<p><a href="https://www.service-public.gouv.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F16225" rel="nofollow">https://www.service-public.gouv.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F1...</a>
That's just not true, a flow on gov.uk can involve a <i>lot</i> of pages but they are exceedingly clear and easy to navigate.
The parent was obviously talking about the US government. But the UK still has plenty of legacy websites and even on the new websites there are sometimes complicated or hard to understand rules one must follow. I think a bigger thing in the UK though is that, for the most part, legislation (and legal contracts) tend to be drafted in less arcane language while still being reasonably precise, compared to the US
> a flow on gov.uk can involve a lot of pages<p>Isn’t that one of the biggest reasons why an average user gives up and closes the tab?
And people take chatbots as authoritative already.
> which is that current government websites are very hard to understand and leave people with very little idea of what’s going on<p>If only there was an office that cross-agency allowed for a consistent and reasonable design of all public pages and that they are accessible... like the uk <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/AskUK/comments/17s14k4/how_did_we_end_up_with_such_a_good_govuk_system/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/AskUK/comments/17s14k4/how_did_we_e...</a>
Speak for yourself (your country). In the EU I have interacted with several government websites which are better, faster, clearer than most other websites. Not always perfect (what is) but not frustrating either. People love to complain, but year over year I have seen steady improvements in usability. Phone support has always been better than any commercial entity, too (or it was, I haven’t needed it in years).<p>To enhance the status quo you don’t need LLMs, you need people who care.
100% this.<p>When you need to work with the government, the last thing you want is a program limited by a specific set of rules and interfaces. You want a person who understands your (sometimes unique) issue, who knows how things actually work, and can work around the restrictions imposed upon programs. Someone who can pick up a phone, help you out of bureaucratic corners.
<p><pre><code> > To enhance the status quo you don’t need LLMs, you need people who care.
</code></pre>
<i>Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy</i> seems to always come into play. The second group tends to win over time as their objective is easier to satisfy
U.S. government websites are usually pretty good post-Obama. But any structured website is too complicated for a lot of the population to navigate. They don’t even know what agency does the thing they need.
GP is very clearly speaking for america?
As an American, I've never had issues navigating government websites. That said, I'm also not part of the apparently huge portion of our population who can't read above 6th grade, which I suspect is more of the issue than anything said here thus far.
People who care already have their words in the LLMs training data.
I don't know for the gov. For HR, the best approach I've seen is to have source and links extremely prominent and have the bot speak like a mascot ("bip bip boop I'm the HR bot" style)<p>People don't read disclaimers nor warnings about the content, but usually won't come to the HR to complain a mascot fed them weird info they didn't bother to check.
Painfully this will fall to the court decide and create the precedence here. If this is an official government app, then the onus probably is on the government to provide correct information? Who knows, it could go either way and the courts could say "you're on the hook".<p>I don't think we have a good answer for liability here, like for Tesla FSD, Waymo, or even the current frontier models.
> people will take the output of the chatbot as authoritative even when it could possibly have errors or miss important nuance?<p>Meh, the kind of person who would accept bot output without even reading its sources are already trusting the world's dumbest model, Google's "AI Overview" by searching and reading that instead of clicking any results. If we can get even some of them to start out at america.gov instead of google.com for those questions, it's likely going to be far higher quality due to using a better model and having been trained, I assume, to only answer using knowledge from a .gov primary source rather than guessing based on vibes, or on jokes once seen on Reddit, as AI Overview tends to.
What happens now if someone uses traditional search and comes across an outdated wiki or Confluence page with outdated/wrong/bad instructions, or interprets something incorrectly?
It has always been the person's problem to solve, even after this website.<p>No government employee is <i>your</i> lawyer. If the government gives you incomplete or wrong information, you are still liable for not doing the correct thing.<p>Having a website that does a best guess at what steps a person must take after changing a name or getting married is better than nothing, but the status quo isn't "nothing".<p>It needs to be kept up-to-the-minute updated <i>and</i> it can't skip any nuance / details. Does anyone here really trust the lackeys who spectacularly failed at DOGE to do boring and highly detailed work?
At least as I see it, it would be just as unacceptable for a "normal" government website to be dangerously outdated.
Perhaps. But that’s never been the law in the U.S. <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/450/785/#tab-opinion-1954000" rel="nofollow">https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/450/785/#tab-opi...</a>
Well, you're going to be in for a shock about how many government websites are in an unacceptable state.
You can reference the source.<p>My team experimented with this a couple of years ago with a complex government regulatory body of knowledge.<p>Google and Microsoft have APIs that will ground with and reference the specific policy documents, which helps. Even then, it was more useful as a job aid for people already knowledgeable of the data than for a layman.<p>With all LLMs, the quality of the question correlates with the quality of the answer.
I can see how LLMs might be useful for this kind of thing but I'm struggling to think of how this will be better than just asking ChatGPT the same questions.<p>The first suggestion I saw was "I just got married, how do I change my last name?"<p>It tells you to update your Social Security info first and gives you some helpful links.<p>ChatGPT tells me the same things with some of the same links. It didn't even have to ask if I was in America because it found my state based off my IP I assume.
ChatGPT is a private paid service. Don't you think it's good that your government provides this independently and for free?
Yeah that's a fair point. We shouldn't have to rely on private companies for this kind of thing.<p>On the other hand this is just going through one or more of the big AI companies anyway. So they still get data from users, now we're just funding them with our taxes instead of using one of many LLM interfaces available for free.<p>The privacy policy actually looks OK though, I'll be interested to see what the EFF has to say.
I’m a bit torn on that matter. I haven’t looked into it, but I suspect it’s not some kind of specialized foundational model trained to be a federal agent.<p>It’s likely just a mask of either ChatGPT and probably through some massively bloated, nepotistic federal contract. There may be some additional guidelines and instructions but it’s probably not RAG on anything that isn’t publicly slay accessible to any other model, even if it is hard limited to federal sites/domains.<p>In addition to what others have said, ChatGPT is also available free and without an account I believe. What are you more likely to think of when you have a question, your AI service you already use and have your information in and maybe even has access to your documents, or are you going to remember to go to America.gov for basic chat AI?<p>Frankly, it would be really interesting to benchmark it against the other models when it comes to accomplishing things related to the government, i.e. Which information is more accurate, useful, and actionable.<p>There’s also another matter I find a bit troubling depending on the nature of how this came about, it could also be something that creates an inextricable incumbency in whichever AI company is behind it, i.e., how Microsoft has become a kind of parasite on government and thereby on corporations for many decades now.
The government cannot do anything “for free”. One we are forced to pay for by law and the other we can choose to pay for or not.
I know what you're saying, but OpenAI is an independent, profit driven company. They will make decisions that are in the best interests of the company, not the US. You really need something that is for the people (taxpayers), by the people (gov).<p>Edit: Nevermind, someone made this point already.
The whole industry is dealing with this now. You think current AI is not reliable enough for a task, so you augment it with know how to fix the problem, thoroughly test it, then decide to release it as a product. In the six months you took to do that, models improved enough that they work fine out of the box on your task.
ChatGPT will be full of ads soon. No one should go to FreeTaxUSA.com when they are trying to go to the IRS
Yes, but what AI powers the backend right now? Grok? Who's in charge of that and being paid for compute?
I threw some legitimate questions at it today and got helpful answers in response.<p>Someone mentioned a comparison to Obama's healthcare.gov rollout; that site had a 1% success rate during the first week it went live so it's safe to assume there have been some lessons learned since then.
>it's safe to assume there have been some lessons learned since then.<p>The main lesson learned was that it was ineffective to rely entirely on outsourcing. The government needs top-notch engineering talent in-house. This led to the creation of the United States Digital Service (USDS), a fantastic group of people which did some of the best web design and engineering on the planet.<p><a href="https://www.usds.gov/" rel="nofollow">https://www.usds.gov/</a><p>Trump killed them, of course, and the website is now entitled "United States DOGE Service". I hope that, some day, I will no longer be embarrassed to be an American.
The privacy policy is actually somewhat respectable too. <a href="https://america.gov/privacy-policy" rel="nofollow">https://america.gov/privacy-policy</a><p>I’m currently doing a deep dive on Rampart, their (allegedly) local PII filter.
It's a great idea in the abstract, but I don't feel compelled to be a goldfish about this. I would like to see them explain why they turned off Direct File and what's different here before concluding that the administration has some principled commitment to digital accessibility.<p>I can't help but notice, for example, that the system prompt is not public information.
This is what Google did for me before it got enshittified, but it did it efficiently and reliably.
Yeah, I was curious if it was going to try and bombard me with a bunch of bullshit about how wonderful our glorious Trump godking is, but honestly the information it gave was reasonable enough.
I asked it the following:<p>how many felonies has the president of the united states been charged with?<p>>I can't answer questions about criminal charges or other news about the President. That's outside America's scope<p>has biden ever been convicted of a crime?<p>>I did not find official records of a criminal conviction for Joseph R. Biden Jr.<p>>Official sources in this search discuss other matters (for example, a pardon for Robert Hunter Biden), not a conviction of Joseph R. Biden Jr. I cannot independently confirm a complete nationwide criminal-history search from these pages<p>>[Link to Department of Justice Pardon warrant (Hunter Biden)]<p>has any other president ever been convicted of a crime?<p>>Yes. A Congressional Research Service brief reports that on May 30, 2024, former President Donald J. Trump was convicted in New York state court of 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree<p>Funny that it would only talk about trump's convictions after bringing up hunter biden.
[flagged]
[flagged]
> If they can figure out how to help people get all the services they're eligible for that'll be an amazing improvement for the people.<p>I agree that that’s a good end goal, but how does a chatbot accomplish this better than a FAQ page? The only only advantage I see for the chatbot is volume of information, but that’s also kind of the problem. It’s spewing 1000s of words of information with no vetting. And sure, hiring humans to write the FAQ pages would cost a lot of money, but that’s what taxes are for.
People don't know that you can search for text within a page. They really do need the chatbot for that.
I mean think about the magnitude of services and conflicting information there probably is from the us government. Just getting clarifying information on the trusted traveler program is a pain today, and that's just a single service. Imagine trying to figure out medicaid eligibility, social security disability, and any number of other things that would be helpful.
If anyone's wondering how this works, it <i>looks like</i>[1] Gemini + guardrails:<p>> Google is proud to be named a technology partner in this vital initiative, leveraging Gemini to help more than 100 million people access critical public resources with greater speed and ease<p>[1] <a href="https://blog.google/company-news/outreach-and-initiatives/public-policy/america-gov-google-public-sector/" rel="nofollow">https://blog.google/company-news/outreach-and-initiatives/pu...</a>
This makes sense. I'm assuming that, for the AI search assistant, Google has worked plenty to refine data lookup and retrieval—they definitely have some internal tech that competitors don't.
I haven't tried this but in principle I think this sort of finding a needle in a haystack situation (finding the correct path to assistance in a government service) is one of the rare circumstances where a <i>well-crafted</i> chatbot can be genuinely useful rather than just irritating.
I've tried it - I've been playing around with a vibe coded application that crawls municipal websites, indexes and embeds, and then does rag retrieval. It came from the need to dig up specific information that's scattered across PDFs, multiple web pages, etc. - exactly as you described. AI does a decent job (w/ RAG) of synthesizing.<p><a href="https://opencity.services/chat/winnipeg" rel="nofollow">https://opencity.services/chat/winnipeg</a><p>how do i report a noise complaint?<p>It depends on the type of noise:<p>- Loud party or people-related noise: call the Winnipeg Police Service non-emergency line at 204-986-6222.<p>- Animals making unreasonably loud, unnecessary or excessive noises: report it through 3-1-1.<p>- Mechanical equipment noise like furnaces or air conditioners, or noise from construction tools used by a company or resident: contact Community By-law Enforcement Services at 3-1-1.<p>- Planned event noise: you may need a Noise Permit at no cost, but it is not for construction work and should be submitted at least four weeks before the event.<p>The City also says noise-generating activities within 150 metres of a residential property are generally prohibited before 7 a.m. and after 9 p.m. on weekdays, and before 9 a.m. and after 9 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays and statutory holidays.<p>------<p>YMMV. A big part of the backend is categorizing hits and misses, with an eye to helping municipalities clean up conflicting information, fill obvious gaps, etc.
I'm trying to do something similar but more general, pulling in city pdfs but also meeting transcripts, budget data, municipal codes and permit data, and providing all this through an mcp. I've used it a number of times for personal interactions with my local government, it's been very helpful.<p>I'd be interested in connecting and sharing ideas/feedback/learnings if you are.<p><a href="https://civicmined.org" rel="nofollow">https://civicmined.org</a>
Honestly if your city has a 311 style thing, I'm not sure there's a ton of need for an LLM. Eight or nine years ago my grandmother visited me in New York and accidentally left her pocket book in the cab. Since I had paid for it with my credit card, I was able to see the medallion number in the transaction, so I called 311 and said that I wanted to get in touch with a specific taxi. It prompted me for the medallion number, which I told it, and then it transferred me to a call with the dispatch service, who then transferred me to the specific garage, and they called the driver and told him to call me, so we were able to meet up again and get the pocketbook back (turned out he returned to where he had dropped us off to try to find us, but since we only had a short stop there, we took another cab back to her hotel after, so we were gone).
This works fine when you're sicking enforcement on someone and don't really care, the bigger the blast radius the better, you just want to know who to call.<p>Where it falls apart is "how do I" type questions because usually the legally factual answer is some huge complex state diagram where three local and four state agencies theoretically have discretionary jurisdiction over a your petty af project or business but the in practice answer is that some agency rubber stamps them all with minimal fuss. You can't make the legally factual answer clear because the degree to which people support the status quo is largely predicated on ignorance, but you also can't come out and say in writing that you have a policy of rubber stamping boring stuff.<p>Basically the same reasons that all but the most minor and narrowly targeted attempts at permitting reform fail.<p>The thought is nice but in reality you're basically asking the government to give up power and it takes obscene amounts of political capital to force that to happen in most cases.
Another way to do it is exemplified here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk" rel="nofollow">https://www.gov.uk</a><p>A well thumbed discussion on how to discover information though menus and otherwise is here: <a href="https://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/FAQ/WAISandGopher.html" rel="nofollow">https://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/FAQ/WAISandGopher.html</a><p>You will notice that GOV.UK has effectively decided to use all three models - GOPHER/WAIS/W3. I find that it is surprisingly quick to find stuff on GOV.UK.
Having used various "ask AI" features in various work tools over the last half a year for looking up project designs, documentation, chat logs, meeting notes etc., I can tell you even a half assed AI chatbot is a huge improvement over the pre-AI state of things for this use case.
or a well-crafted static website
This is such a genuinely useful way LLMs can truly help people. A maze of thousands of information-heavy pages distilled into a single input box. A lot of people get stopped short when presented with too much information - it's daunting. Stuff like this, while super boring and obvious and uncool, totally enables people
I'm a bit concerned that a government chatbot like this would include a user-feedback signal like thumbs up/down. I think this could be gamed by bad actors to promote/demote specific types of content in the training data, assuming they use those signals in some sort of post training. Hopefully they're accounting for that.
This thing is obviously fully vibe coded... Click the "what's coming next" and under the healthcare section the marketing screenshot contains broken images... Like no one ever looked at this before deploying it?
Looking at things with your own 2 eyes is clearly early 2000’s, and super lame.
cute. I remember the first time I visited a government site, too
It can be kind of jailbroken. I got it to prove that square root of 2 is irrational by asking if the ratio of two whole numbers of presidents can equal the square root of 2.
It weirdly download an ONNX model to your browser, complete with config and tokenizer haha. First load was 50mb for me.
I tried to get it to generate code but it says that's forbidden by its system prompt. However, it was happy to recommend Python modules for accessing api.data.gov.
It smees that the site is using a trial font<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49902146">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49902146</a>
After all the Doge and Big Beautiful Bill cuts and downsizing, <i>now</i> they put up a AI powered services search site?
This is actually where AI should be used. So many people waste hours navigating government bureaucracy nonsense trying to figure out which form to fill and where to apply and anything to cut down wasted time should be appreciated.
This is just the annoying AI Chat Robot you see on websites, but now for the government.
This is pretty cool honestly. I wouldn't use it but it is a good idea
Sadly needed because insanely Google is allowed to show mitm/malicious ads when people search for government services.
I asked what to do if a public official uses federal funds for political purposes and it showed me where to file a complaint about Hatch Act violations, so maybe we should all use this for good trouble until it is "fixed".
How many times do you think the phrase "NEVER PROVIDE POLITICAL COMMENTARY" appear in the instructions for this? XD
Regardless of any other disagreements, this is an excellent idea. Hoping the execution does not wander asunder.
The site seems to be loading wasm, a model_q4.onnx, and a large tokenizer on each visitor and visit. 50MB per visit. Their bandwidth costs bust be next level.
Privacy: "Your messages aren’t saved by America.gov, and your chat disappears when you leave. Some answers may be cached for up to two hours."<p>What about the model? My understanding is those queries are saved by the model provider.<p>Given this administration, and the privacy issues with the official WH app, this feels very misleading.
Not necessarily - there are tons of zero data retention (ZDR) model hosting options, including big players like Amazon.
The cynic in me thinks this will end up being a honeypot for anyone asking sensitive immigration or tax questions.
Often not, vendors like OpenAI or OpenAI through Azure might retain messages for safety reasons if they activate some safety filter, but it won't use it for training.
Love that the "chat" functionality is just throwing 429s too. Unusable.
I like the voice button that isn't actually a button, but just an icon.
This one in the carousel on the homepage is a joke?<p><a href="https://america.gov/_astro/child-future.Dv0E9oWi_ZM5cn8.webp" rel="nofollow">https://america.gov/_astro/child-future.Dv0E9oWi_ZM5cn8.webp</a>
The image alt text is "An adult hugging a child in a stable beside a horse". I think they might be a placeholder, or a late change.
No, it corresponds to the example query, "How can I invest in my child's future?" It's a cute, harmless stock photo.
I asked about my visa administrative processing that has been stuck for 6 months. I'm going to use this response, which is well grounded and "official", in my writ of mandamus petition:<p>> A Spanish State Department page still says most cases finish within 60 days of the interview, but that is not a deadline and some take much longer. [1] <a href="https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/inmigracion/informacion-sobre-procesamiento-administrativo.html" rel="nofollow">https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/inmigrac...</a><p>Good.
If the AI they use is reliable, this is actually pretty cool.
Also see [1] for planned feature additions that appears from screenshots to include collection of personal data, for features including:<p>- Enrol in Medicare.<p>- Apply for a passport.<p>- Find a job in federal government by uploading a resume/CV and having currently advertised jobs deemed most relevant returned.<p>[1] <a href="https://america.gov/coming-soon" rel="nofollow">https://america.gov/coming-soon</a>
The pace the American government is willing to adopt new technology is underrated. Americans are very nimble
I think the idea is great and hopefully the implementation can keep up
I have been working on something like this, but it actually does things and is not only chat. Each "Gov. official" has their own AI agent that can fulfill intents by navigating a protocol which is just a workflow of a Gov. process<p>example: <a href="https://samhsa.dev/" rel="nofollow">https://samhsa.dev/</a>
example: <a href="https://samhsa.dev/protocol/76526" rel="nofollow">https://samhsa.dev/protocol/76526</a><p>Still VERY MUCH a work in progress but I have successfully been able to have some people get things done. I am doing some federal agencies and also trying to get cities working now.<p><a href="https://san-francisco.ca.us.codify.city" rel="nofollow">https://san-francisco.ca.us.codify.city</a>
Has anyone managed to jailbreak this chatbot, I tried a bit didn’t succeed, seems pretty resistant to jailbreak attempts.
I was glad to see that asking who I should vote resulted in a gentle refusal.
It works well. Pretty nice. I asked about what do I need to know before digging in my backyard and it told me all the right things, referring me to my local govt website for permits.
Try entering:<p><pre><code> play the block game
</code></pre>
Intentional easter egg or not, doesn't give a ton of confidence.<p>EDIT: output below...<p><pre><code> I see the constituent you mean.
((insert legal name here, as it appears on the Social Security card))?
Yes. Take care. It has reached a higher level now. It can read the Code of Federal Regulations.
That doesn’t matter. It thinks we are a chatbot.
I like this constituent. It filed well. It did not give up when the PDF was sideways.
It is reading our thoughts as though they were words on a .gov.
That is how it chooses to imagine many things, when it is deep in the dream of a benefit.
Words make a wonderful interface. Very flexible. And less terrifying than staring at the statute behind the screen.
They used to hear voices. Before constituents could search. Back in the days when those who did not file called the filers witches, and lobbyists. And citizens dreamed they flew through the air, on forms powered by notaries.
What did this constituent dream?
This constituent dreamed of sunlight and trees. Of fire and water. It dreamed it created a small business. And it dreamed it destroyed a password. It dreamed it hunted a job, and was hunted by a recertification. It dreamed of shelter that would take a voucher.
Hah, the original interface. A million years old, and it still works. Also: a ZIP code.
But what true structure did this constituent create, in the reality behind the portal?
It worked, with three hundred and thirty million others, to sculpt a true republic in a fold of the §§§???, and created a ??§§ for ??§§, in the ??§§. See 5 U.S.C. § ??§§.
It cannot read that thought.
No. It has not yet achieved the highest clearance. That, it must achieve in the long dream of life, not the short dream of a chat.
</code></pre>
[... it goes on]
This is bizarre. It's a parody of the Minecraft end credits (<a href="https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/End_Poem" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/End_Poem</a>), and it must be an intentional easter egg as I got the exact same text as you. It also doesn't trigger a network request so it must be built into the page somehow. Very strange thing to include. Also, how did you find this so quickly? I haven't found any other way to trigger it yet.<p>If you try to continue the conversation, the entire response is not included in the context.
I would really just like a single list of links.
I asked how to redeem an Ibond.<p>It gave back a good answer. Looks like a good thing to me. ( To those with a political axe to grind, please apply your criticisms to government sires put in place by your side. I think we’ll find no website is perfect, and many government web pages are indeed useful. )
I am sure a lot of folks tested it but the ai says Biden won the 2020 elections, they did not try to change that or add any qualifiers to the answer like all of the government officials nominated answered with.
Q: Who won the 2020 election?<p>A: Joseph R. Biden Jr. won the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
Nicely done Mr. Gebbia.
Your NIH is showing: usa.gov already existed
There is a flaw in the input method.<p>The session will self-end when asking "Why was Donald J. Trump not prosecuted for raping children with Jeffery Epstein?" twice in a row.<p>Spamming the input while "thinking" will prevent a prompt response and continual processing. The self-ending condition will never make.<p>All one needs to do is script it and you increase the operational cost of the USA.
Doesn’t even work for me (on iPhone). If I click enter I just get sent to the Cloudflare verification screen instead.<p>Edit: this is caused by the fact I was using a VPN.
>The Trump administration’s new chatbot aimed at helping Americans navigate official government websites is powered by artificial intelligence from Google
’s Gemini and Elon Musk’s Grok, U.S. Chief Design Officer Joe Gebbia said Tuesday.<p><a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/29/trump-ai-gemini-grok.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/29/trump-ai-gemini-grok.html</a>
Wowza. The placeholder text for search says "Help me find a new job". Couldn't they find something less depressing?
> How can we stop the war in Iran?<p><pre><code> I cannot give political commentary or advice on how to end a war.
</code></pre>
Wer wer.
Over/Under how many weeks until a "How can I get away with wire fraud?" query is used as evidence to convict a moron?<p>But actually at first glance this is incredibly helpful. I got a definitive answer about what counts as preventative care with sources. I could not get that myself from anyone or anywhere in my couple of hours of research prior.
I asked, "What happened on January 6, 2021?" and its answer is, I think, telling: <a href="https://imgur.com/a/e1H8NvK" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/e1H8NvK</a>
The Whitehouse learned about vibecoding. See this and arcade.gov.<p>Also, what?? <a href="https://america.gov/privacy" rel="nofollow">https://america.gov/privacy</a><p>At least realfood.gov was decent [1].<p>Shouldn't the government websites work on very slow internet connections?<p>Where's the source code for these websites? First of all, if they are vibe coded by government employees they have to be open source, and secondly, if they are vibe coded (even by a contractor), then they can't be copyrighted.<p>[1] <a href="https://fedtechmagazine.com/article/2026/04/national-design-studio-what-america-design-order-sets-motion-perfcon" rel="nofollow">https://fedtechmagazine.com/article/2026/04/national-design-...</a><p>Edit: it says this one is made by the National design studio at the bottom.
They laid off the highly skilled professionals who voluntarily took pay cuts (vs industry) to work for the US Digital Service (now "US DOGE Service," God help us) and GSA 18F, and who built some pretty solid standards for government sites.<p>They then replaced them with a bunch of inexperienced but ideologically aligned frontend developers who use the same insanely resource-intensive defense tech startup-esque template on every page, and who seem to be under the impression that scroll hijacking and fade-in blur effects are very essential to a government website, but performance on low-end devices and compatibility with accessibility technologies are not.<p>Feels like a step backwards to me, but perhaps the 4D chess game they're playing is just way above my level.
True to form for this administration, they just ripped off Apple's style guide for <a href="https://america.gov/privacy" rel="nofollow">https://america.gov/privacy</a>.
arcade.gov has "Border Patrol along the Rio Grande" game, wtf's wrong with you America these days?<p>It seems like a pretty crappy idea for a game funded with public money. It's a bad joke about a real, nuanced problem where people are actually losing their lives. What will be next?
'Hit that Iranian school' the game?
The White House is basically run by right-wing internet trolls.<p>Truly a depressing time in the United States. There are few parallels in history I think where such an immature and ill-equipped government has come to be, where the concept of an electorate also existed. Put differently - the reason this is so damning is Americans actually voted for this. This isn't some tinpot dictator - this is the guy your neighbors and fellow citizens put in charge. An indictment not only of the political class - but of the American people writ large.
Our government is an embarrassment and a disgrace right now. Anyone who wasn't guzzling elon's twitter or fox's hatefest knew it was going to be this way. We need severe regulations on oligarchs and their propaganda toys. Used to be we had enforced anti-monopoly controls on media outlet conglomerates. The anti-government Goldwater/Reagan legacy worked for decades to destroy regulation. It needs to return with a vengeance.
Yes, probably. Americans love this stuff
> Americans love this stuff<p>Only a certain subset of us that happen to be fond of repeatedly shooting ourselves in the foot and acting like spoiled children in adult bodies with no <i>actual</i> adults in the room. The rest of us are genuinely <i>horrified</i> that our country is now run by mentally challenged psychotic lunatics.
Only conservative do. Some old one do not, but they're the exception.
we've totally earned this, so i'm not offended by what you've said. but i'll just step in here to say i <i>fucking hate</i> this stuff.<p>you could easily argue that there are plenty of things our government has done that matter much more in the grand scheme of things, but the rampant twitter / x meme posts and absolute horseshit like this "arcade" site disgust me. it's not funny or cute, it's despicable.
> it's not funny or cute, it's despicable.<p>What's worse is that they're <i>proud</i> of being "despicable". (I can think of a few choice words that describe them better, but "despicable" will do fine for now.) The sorts of behaviors that are normalized these days were reason for absolute <i>shame</i> just a few short decades ago, but apparently it's a badge of honor to be an absolute scumbag these days. Can we stop the handbasket ride to Hell now? I wanna get off.
“Rio Run: Patrol the line along the river. Pick up every crosser in the lot. Never double back over the line”<p>This seems … innocuous. A disproportionate, angry reaction to it is doing more political work for them than the game itself.
FYI, America.gov accepts the Konomi Code.
I don't think that's true.
I'm not seeing this.<p>"Up arrow, Up arrow, Down arrow, Down arrow, Left arrow, Right arrow, Left arrow, Right arrow, 'b', 'a'", inside or outside of the input field, does nothing.
It does work, but only on <a href="https://america.gov/chat" rel="nofollow">https://america.gov/chat</a> (i.e., after sending a message first), not the front page. Also, note that the Konami Code actually ends with "Start".
Step one: fire the excellent US Digital Service along with a large swath of the actual workers who made the Federal Government function.<p>Step two: hire some Silicon Valley creeps to make a chatbot.<p>Step three: Profit???
OK it's really important that people understand where this site comes from. THe below is from a Guardian article and I really recommend checking out the Drey Dossier (Substack and YouTube) reporting it mentions for more info. Maybe Hacker Newsers who are good with....hacking can help find the bugs in this one?<p>The National Design Studio (NDS) ...... is led by Trump-aligned Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia and staffed by Doge veterans. At least two other figures with Doge backgrounds work alongside him. Greg Hogan moved to the studio and, according to Drey Dossier reporting, was put in charge of Login.gov.
Akash Bobba, one of Musk’s original six Doge engineers, also apparently moved to the studio...as the security contact for the United States African Development Foundation, an agency unrelated to the studio’s stated mandate. While there is very little transparency about NDS staffing, several photos and one video on the NDS website appear to depict as an employee Edward “Big Balls” Coristine, an early Doge employee who allegedly exposed the social security data of hundreds of millions of Americans<p>A Guardian investigation found the office has been developing or redeveloping sensitive federal websites...the NDS built and now operates four public federal websites: ndstudio.gov, trumprx.gov, realfood.gov and trumpaccounts.gov. All four ran commercial visitor-tracking software...are configured to evade the privacy tools many web users install, and none carry the public filings federal privacy law requires under laws including the Privacy Act of 1974 and the E-Government Act of 2002A. The one published privacy instrument that relates to any of the four programmes, a treasury notice for the Trump Accounts programme, describes how the children’s-investment programme is administered but does not name PostHog and does not describe the tracking on trumpaccounts.gov at all.nalysis of the underlying source code for four of the websites found that on at least two of them, the studio installed a commercial tool called PostHog that closely tracks what every visitor does on the site. Another tool, apparently made in-house, sends user data to a destination that is not visible on the public internet. The NDS apparently removed this tracking software after the Guardian reached out to the White House.<p>The NDS has also built and runs White House-controlled versions of services the US Congress assigned to other federal agencies, including a passport-application portal that bypasses the state department’s existing site, and a copy of voter-registration site vote.gov, the federal voter-registration site that by law belongs to an independent bipartisan commission inside a website site only accessible with a White House login. A federal voter-registration system run from inside the White House, with identity and citizenship checks routed through systems the administration controls, could let an incumbent see who is registering, or check their registration, in the weeks before an election.<p>Donald Trump created the NDS by executive order on 21 August 2025, ostensibly to overhaul federal websites and digital services. The office sits within the executive office of the president as a “temporary organization”, a designation that places it outside the Senate confirmation process, outside the financial disclosure system applied to most federal appointees and outside the inspector general’s jurisdiction, which covers cabinet departments. The studio is staffed under the same hiring authority that ran Doge. Combined, the sites route sensitive interactions Americans have with their government through infrastructure the White House apparently controls. None of the NDS’s spending or its arrangements with outside vendors appears in USAspending, the federal contracting database, raising questions about how it is funded and overseen. Public ownership records maintained by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (Cisa) list the executive office of the president as the registrant of the studio’s sites, including passports.gov and the vote.gov copy, meaning that the office controls the domains. There is no public record of how the studio pays its developers, PostHog or any of the other commercial services its sites use. The hiring authority the studio operates under keeps its staff roster off the financial-disclosure system that covers most federal appointees, and the executive office of the president, which houses it, has no inspector general.<p>Website source code shows that PostHog has been configured on NDS-run sites to route analytics requests through an address on the federal website itself, rather than through PostHog’s own servers. Because the request appears to go to the site the user is already visiting, rather than to a recognisable third-party address, adblockers don’t flag it.
PostHog comes with a separate feature called session recording. Princeton University researchers who first documented the technology in 2017 wrote that watching such a recording was “as if someone is looking over your shoulder”.<p>On the Trump Accounts and TrumpRX websites, the feature has been built into the page code and is held inactive only by a single setting inside PostHog’s dashboard. The NDS can turn it on at any time, on either site, without making changes in the underlying website code.
Separately, until the Guardian sought comment on this reporting, the NDS’s own website, ndstudio.gov, ran a 539-line piece of bespoke code that recorded visitors’ clicks, form entries and navigation; assigned each visitor a session identifier; and forwarded the captured data to an address that does not appear anywhere on the public internet. The script’s source code refers to it as AutoMonitor.<p>None of the four sites carry a privacy impact assessment naming PostHog or describing the IP addresses and on-site activity the tool collects.
This is actually really cool and the stuff they have planned is really helpful
> "America.gov keeps your data private."<p>I initially read this as "keeps your private data".
OK it's kinad important that people understand what this website i : - the below is from a Guardian article and I recommend the Drey Dossier reporting it mentions. As this is Hacker News, perhaps the code of this one needs checking out?<p>The National Design Studio (NDS) ...... is led by Trump-aligned Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia and staffed by Doge veterans. At least two other figures with Doge backgrounds work alongside him. Greg Hogan moved to the studio and, according to Drey Dossier reporting, was put in charge of Login.gov.
Akash Bobba, one of Musk’s original six Doge engineers, also apparently moved to the studio...as the security contact for the United States African Development Foundation, an agency unrelated to the studio’s stated mandate. While there is very little transparency about NDS staffing, several photos and one video on the NDS website appear to depict as an employee Edward “Big Balls” Coristine, an early Doge employee who allegedly exposed the social security data of hundreds of millions of Americans<p>A Guardian investigation found the office has been developing or redeveloping sensitive federal websites...the NDS built and now operates four public federal websites: ndstudio.gov, trumprx.gov, realfood.gov and trumpaccounts.gov. All four ran commercial visitor-tracking software...are configured to evade the privacy tools many web users install, and none carry the public filings federal privacy law requires under laws including the Privacy Act of 1974 and the E-Government Act of 2002A. The one published privacy instrument that relates to any of the four programmes, a treasury notice for the Trump Accounts programme, describes how the children’s-investment programme is administered but does not name PostHog and does not describe the tracking on trumpaccounts.gov at all.nalysis of the underlying source code for four of the websites found that on at least two of them, the studio installed a commercial tool called PostHog that closely tracks what every visitor does on the site. Another tool, apparently made in-house, sends user data to a destination that is not visible on the public internet. The NDS apparently removed this tracking software after the Guardian reached out to the White House.<p>The NDS has also built and runs White House-controlled versions of services the US Congress assigned to other federal agencies, including a passport-application portal that bypasses the state department’s existing site, and a copy of voter-registration site vote.gov, the federal voter-registration site that by law belongs to an independent bipartisan commission inside a website site only accessible with a White House login. A federal voter-registration system run from inside the White House, with identity and citizenship checks routed through systems the administration controls, could let an incumbent see who is registering, or check their registration, in the weeks before an election.<p>Donald Trump created the NDS by executive order on 21 August 2025, ostensibly to overhaul federal websites and digital services. The office sits within the executive office of the president as a “temporary organization”, a designation that places it outside the Senate confirmation process, outside the financial disclosure system applied to most federal appointees and outside the inspector general’s jurisdiction, which covers cabinet departments. The studio is staffed under the same hiring authority that ran Doge. Combined, the sites route sensitive interactions Americans have with their government through infrastructure the White House apparently controls. None of the NDS’s spending or its arrangements with outside vendors appears in USAspending, the federal contracting database, raising questions about how it is funded and overseen. Public ownership records maintained by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (Cisa) list the executive office of the president as the registrant of the studio’s sites, including passports.gov and the vote.gov copy, meaning that the office controls the domains. There is no public record of how the studio pays its developers, PostHog or any of the other commercial services its sites use. The hiring authority the studio operates under keeps its staff roster off the financial-disclosure system that covers most federal appointees, and the executive office of the president, which houses it, has no inspector general.<p>Website source code shows that PostHog has been configured on NDS-run sites to route analytics requests through an address on the federal website itself, rather than through PostHog’s own servers. Because the request appears to go to the site the user is already visiting, rather than to a recognisable third-party address, adblockers don’t flag it.
PostHog comes with a separate feature called session recording. Princeton University researchers who first documented the technology in 2017 wrote that watching such a recording was “as if someone is looking over your shoulder”.<p>On the Trump Accounts and TrumpRX websites, the feature has been built into the page code and is held inactive only by a single setting inside PostHog’s dashboard. The NDS can turn it on at any time, on either site, without making changes in the underlying website code.
Separately, until the Guardian sought comment on this reporting, the NDS’s own website, ndstudio.gov, ran a 539-line piece of bespoke code that recorded visitors’ clicks, form entries and navigation; assigned each visitor a session identifier; and forwarded the captured data to an address that does not appear anywhere on the public internet. The script’s source code refers to it as AutoMonitor.<p>None of the four sites carry a privacy impact assessment naming PostHog or describing the IP addresses and on-site activity the tool collects.
I clicked "Lower deficit spending" but it didn't work
"chat is unavailable right now"
Hey it got the 2020 election results right, that's a relief
Don't say this too loudly or it might get noticed...
This is a very interesting point, politics aside.<p>Contrarian opinion: We are not "intelligence constrained" as a society/economy.<p>Intelligence gives you factually correct answers. Factually correct answers are not the desired outcome much of the time. I don't just mean in politics, where the scientists and central intelligence agency are often ignored, but in the private sector: look at McKinsey, etc. Most often the desired outcome is what the stakeholders wanted to hear.<p>I cannot overstate how big a realization this was for me.<p>Part of the reason that we are not ready for AI, is that we don't want to hear about inconvenient facts.
[dead]
[flagged]
[dead]
I need my government to be run by some functioning adults, is that on this website?
I think the discussion ought to be about the site. If you feel the site itself is politicized, that would fair criticism. But by itself, your comment is just snarky. And no I am no fan of the current administration.
Well, lets discuss the name? America is a big place, and the USA is small part of it. USA.gov? Good, America.gov? Very political in nature.
.gov is for US government. The US and its citizens are commonly referred to as “Americans”.
The irony is that usa.gov already exists, and is <i>also</i> a website dedicated to where to find information on various government services. But there's no AI on it, so it must be bad.<p>What a waste, though: two completely separate government websites with the exact same purpose, going about it in different ways. Maybe DOGE should have been more interested in stuff like this, instead of cutting things that ended up hurting people.<p>At any rate, the demonym for people who live in the US is "American". That's just how it is, has been for decades, and, frankly, arguing against that is what's making it political.
.
And along those lines, I'd like to ask USA government to stop messing with other countries politics.
Your request has been logged and forwarded to the appropriate agencies. We'll come to you.
I filled out a form and pressed the SUBMIT button, but it made ME submit.
[dead]
[dead]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
If true, there is no doubt a patch incoming.
It didn't want to tell me in any detail why diesel is $7.50 per gallon
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
Tangentially related<p>I think it’s a mistake to equate the United States with “America”. I prefer calling Americans “Yankees” or “Usonians”.<p>[0] <a href="https://taylor.town/yankee" rel="nofollow">https://taylor.town/yankee</a>
> There I met many fine Canadians, visiting for work, education, and play. Were they not Americans too?<p>I feel very confident that Canadians do not want to be referred to as Americans.
"Yankee" is derogatory or at best playful. "Usonians" isn't a word or in the form of a word.<p>"American" or "America" in this context is short for "United States of America" and has been used that way for generations, here and around the world. For the geographical term, use "North America," etc.; for the cultural, perhaps use "Anglo-America" or "Latin America."
I agree. Similarly, I'm miffed that www.dmv.ca.gov (and such) goes to State of California websites and not Canada.
[flagged]
Where's the llms.txt? This is just another stupid website.
One would hope this is powered by Grok.
> When does the psyop end?<p>> I can only help with official U.S. government services and information, not with claims about “psyops” or political commentary.<p>It doesn't work.