4 comments

  • pocketman46 minutes ago
    Seagate: It was the best of drives, it was the worst of drives…<p>*AFR%-wise
  • psolidgold29 minutes ago
    Hah. &quot;load bearing&quot; is such a common claude-ism that its legitimate usage now needs to be acknowledged:<p>&quot;That question is becoming more relevant as higher-capacity drives become more (dare we say) load bearing.&quot;
    • happytoexplain25 minutes ago
      It makes me a little physically sick that writing, something I love, is now tainted by the constant nagging thought, &quot;could somebody mistake that sentence as AI?&quot;<p>Critics of this line of worrying tend to fall into the same category of irrationality&#x2F;bias as the &quot;just be yourself&quot; advice-givers.
  • mistrial949 minutes ago
    thx for posting this. Personally I am a fan of Western Digital Black Label spinning drives. Say what you will! I have details, and basically they work for me. AFAIK in 2026 and back into 2025, there are very large, new high-spec Western Digital Black Label disks in the catalog.. that I just cannot order. It says &quot;all orders are pre-allocated until further notice&quot; or similar ? Meanwhile, the same disks I bought ten years ago, same size, spec, performance and rating, as also available and I can buy those.. for perhaps twenty percent more than I paid long ago. This is new to me, this situation where an ordinary civilian cannot purchase the large drives, exclusive to &quot;select customers&quot; with opaque wording and no end in sight. The happy escalator of increasing spec and similar consumer prices, has ended.<p>Why am I reading the very newest Backblaze drive report -- they fired the over-forty engineer who started this, apparently.. and I as a consumer, cannot buy the same drives that might be listed there -- have not looked yet. The entire situation is fundementally changed. Info welcome
  • XanderOn6 hours ago
    [flagged]