I wonder how many HNers recall life in Delhi even 20 years ago? Cutting electricity loss is one thing, but getting rid of "load shedding" (unplanned power cuts) is the really revolutionary part. It was not uncommon for the power to go out several times a day and you had to rush to unplug expensive appliances (TV, laptop), because when the power came back it was often accompanied by a surge. My office was wired with two sets of electrical sockets, one connected to grid mains and the other connected to the UPS (for important equipment only).
> unplanned power cuts<p>Actually load shedding is planned power cuts. I have seen a schedule published in a newspaper with different regions of the city (not Delhi) and times when no electricity will be available. This is for ppl to plan their day
I suspect the semantics are about how long in advance it's planned. A day or two? Planned. An hour? Hard sell.
The load shedding was a chronic problem. It lasted months if not years.<p>Example from year 2003 (city = Pune) [1]. Its hard to read<p>Excerpt:<p>The load shedding schedule is as follows:<p><pre><code> Group A: Monday 8 am to 11 am, Tuesday 11 am to 2 pm,Wednesday 3 to 6 pm, Saturday 11 am to 2 pm: Navi Peth, Gultekdi I and II, Dhankawdi, Padmawati, Old Parvati I and II, SNDT, G Block, Parsi agiary, City Apollo, Sant Tukaram, Kharalwadi.
Group B: Monday 11 am to 2 pm, Tuesday 3 pm to 6 pm, Friday 8 am to 11 am
</code></pre>
[1] <a href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/mseb-announces-new-load-shedding-scheme-for-city/articleshow/36703312.cms" rel="nofollow">https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/mseb-announces...</a>
This continued even in 2013. Had to finally pay for an inverter because PCs do not have built in batteries like laptops do and work was being impacted.<p>Useless industries like RO water, gensets, inverters etc are so much larger in India because of governmental abdication of responsibility due to political compulsions. Once you have your own house, or live in a gated community/highrise with its own water/power infra, you get almost western levels of comfort without the messiness of the outside world.
I just don't understand why government didn't step in and raise the price of electricity 5x.<p>It is better to have electricity 24x7 but only 50 watts to run a fridge, phone charger and one lightbulb, than to have electricity 3 hours a day but be running 1000 watts of airconditioners.<p>I guess perhaps energy theft was too hard to police?
Far enough in advance to be available in a printed newspaper. Planned.
Planned collision with iceberg!
> Actually load shedding is planned power cuts.<p>Isn't that a rolling blackout? Load shedding is the technical term and can happen for a variety of reasons that are not based on policy.
Planned for the electric officials, unplanned for the consumers.<p>Nowadays, power cuts are announced via SMS in advanced. Before, this was not the case.
Load shedding = it was done on purpose, not that it was pre-planned. If a sudden problem occurs, some areas can be cut to prevent wider failure. I would expect this to be largely automatic.
There was some priority order to determine which circuits should be load-shed when there is a power shortage. For example while scouting datacenter sites across Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai, I learnt that 220KV lines were not part of load-shedding schedule whereas 66KV lines were. If you took power directly from the power generation company and had contracted power then also you were protected.
Every second house had a diesel generator back then. Ours had to be cranked started by hand(not for the heartless) before push button starters became a thing. The shutoff though was simple tug on the switch; I attached a twine that ran to my bedside for shutoff, which was a godsend at 2:00 AM when the power came back on to make those crazy summer days a bit easier to sleep through.
Do you remember the scheduled water cuts? We would stockpile water in buckets so we could flush the toilets. Good old days!
> My office was wired with two sets of electrical sockets, one connected to grid mains and the other connected to the UPS (for important equipment only).<p>This I think is a standard practice in any large office building in France (Europe? Global?) too, regardless of the frequency of the power cuts. I don't remember witnessing any power cuts in the office (not since long ago anyway), but in most of the places there are systematically white and red sockets, red ones being powered through a UPS. So, server machines go into red ones. Well, we don't have servers anymore, but the sockets are still there anyway. Hopefully UPS too, LOL.
I've never seen them in France. I've seen them in a chemistry lab section of a university in New Zealand and I believe they're also common in data centers, NOCs, etc. worldwide.
US typically has the whole office with UPS and diesel generators (if it is important enough to do so).
No, this isn't <i>remotely</i> "typical." You have no idea what you're talking about.<p>The building <i>might</i> be on a generator. The whole building is most assuredly not on UPS.<p>Even in hospitals only certain outlets are on UPS - the stuff that absolutely cannot be interrupted - though a lot of hospital equipment now has its own battery system, at least in part for convenience.<p>I don't know if it's still done but semiconductor plants used to use intertia-based grid smoothing/UPS systems to handle millisecond-level interrupts and voltage fluctuations.
But all the nuclear power bros told me electricity in France is uber reliable and bountiful because it's all nuclear! We need nuclear power plants for a stable grid!<p>It's almost like grid inertia is a different problem from matching changes in demand, and nuclear really sucks at the latter...<p>Putting computer systems on UPSs isn't a Europe thing. Backup generators and UPS units are very common, or at least they were until everyone got infatuated with moving all their data "into the cloud" and stopped maintaining, or building, infrastructure in office space for it.<p>Now everyone has all their eggs in the Amazon/Microsoft/Google basket, and instead of the (ahem, regulated) telco or electric company going out...the cloud provider does, and unlike before where you could still work locally - now you can't do anything.<p>But hey, it was cheaper, right?<p>Oops...
Sounds similar to life in Dhaka in the 1980s. I remember many sleepless nights where the power went out for no discernible reason and our air conditioner (a window unit in my parent’s bedroom) stopped working. My understanding is that this has gotten much better in Dhaka over the last decade, though the recent energy crisis set things back.
I spent two weeks in Bangalore in 2014. Power cuts happened roughly every other day.<p>Thankfully, I stayed in a nice hotel with an automatic generator, so the power would cut out for a second or two before the generator came on, and then would cut back out for a second or two a few minutes later when the hotel went back on the mains.
I still remember those summer midnights, without cooler
How's life these days over there?
We've traded power cuts for pollution. The current government seems energetic enough in trying to fix the problem, but frankly it's something every single developed country in existence went through at some point, so there's probably no escaping it. Hopefully the pollution era will be shorter than it was in other places!
[flagged]
[flagged]
We are 1.48 billion people (and growing) in a nation that is 1/3rd the size of the US. Expected to reach 1.7+ billion in another 20-30 years - which will increase desperation considerably.<p>The birth rate falling is a VERY good thing. India cannot really support more than 300-400 million people with a high quality of life with its geographic size and exhausted resources. Life becomes cheaper than disposable toilet paper otherwise.
> <i>India cannot really support more than 300-400 million people with a high quality of life with its geographic size and exhausted resources</i><p>Source for this carrying capacity?
Glad you asked!<p>India has roughly ~18% of humanity but only about 4% of global freshwater resources, and agriculture consumes roughly 80–90% of India's water. The World Bank estimates that around 600 million Indians already face water stress. (The number is actually higher in many estimates)<p><a href="https://www.worldbank.org/en/brief/2026/03/19/how-india-is-addressing-its-water-needs" rel="nofollow">https://www.worldbank.org/en/brief/2026/03/19/how-india-is-a...</a><p>There is also substantial pressure on land. Government data report about 97.85 million hectares, or ~30% of India's geographical area, as affected by land degradation/desertification.<p><a href="https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?lang=2&reg=48&relid=75456" rel="nofollow">https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?lang=2&reg=...</a><p>If you want long-term, sustainable agriculture, we need to heavily move to organic farming. This yields ~30% less food produce. I forgot the popular paper on this - can dig it up.<p>India has also exhausted its mineral reserves. This is not fully our fault. We were fully strip mined and utterly bankrupted by the British in WW2. <a href="https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?lang=2&reg=48&relid=75456" rel="nofollow">https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?lang=2&reg=...</a><p>(IMHO that is the real reason why we got independence - the Brits didn't want to keep holding to a distressed asset and immediately liquidated. Look at Bengal famine of 1943)<p>We are having heavy import dependency on minerals - a ridiculous 80%!!! dependency, which is causing significant problems in our trade/current-account deficit.<p>So, if we want maximum ecological comfort, and long-term, prosperous standard of living, we need a significantly reduced population. You can get the number by just halving our population simply taking into account high-availability to water and then reduce further for sustainable agriculture and sustainable mineral consumption.
> <i>If you want long-term, sustainable agriculture, we need to heavily move to organic farming</i><p>This is deeply unsupported by the evidence I’ve seen. Organic farming tends to look far more resource intensive than modern methods. Often for little discernible gain in flavor and nutrition.<p>> <i>You can get the number by just halving our population</i><p>I agree with your conclusion given the data, particularly around mineral exhaustion. (Though there is also the issue of severe mismatches. Lots of lithium, for example, yet no battery industry to speak of.)
That's very obtuse, there is always time to make more CASH, but there isn't to reverse a culture where having 0 children is normal and encouraged.
Indians like to blame population for their problems. But India is very big. Mumbai is about as densely populated as Paris.
No, Mumbai is significantly more densely populated than Paris when looking at the entire urban scale and not just a few areas of Paris. This is easily fact-checked.<p>I mean Mumbai's population is 10x Paris population, so this should be obvious.
Wikipedia lists the core city of both as 50,000 per square mile, though it looks like the Mumbai numbers are somewhat old. More recent numbers say 73,000 per square mile for Mumbai. Which is similar to Manhattan’s residential population density.
Who's not speed running that right now? I can't really fault India in particular when it's nearly universal.
You said it yourself, nearly, so it's not something written in stone.<p>I can fault India (and, in particular, Modi) for repeating the same mistake all other western developed countries made 40 years before, yes.
You mean working to prevent unwanted teen pregnancies?
You mean are making right now? Also not just western developed countries, unless you count Russia, China, Japan, etc. as western.
Oops, I was a little too implicit.<p>made 40 years... before they (India) started developing.<p>Western countries were at the forefront of this already in the 80s. India, starting to develop much later, had a big time buffer to learn from that and at least attempt to avoid it.
<i>Every</i> part of the world is affected by this. Even Niger, which still leads the world in birth rate is seeing falling birth rates. There is no known way to prevent that short of halting economic and social development.
Eh, I think the birth rate (and economic challenges re: wages, etc.) from western countries are much simpler to explain, and also much much harder to resist than this implies.<p>Effective and safe Birth control is something that has never before existing in human history (with the possible exception of a specific plant during the Roman Empire which was driven to extinction due to over harvesting), and which society doesn’t really have a decent answer to address in a stable fashion yet. As clearly demonstrated by the upcoming demographic collapse.<p>The short term incentives this provides to women (and men who benefit in the short term as well) is just too powerful to fully contain, despite all the attempts from the powerful religious groups in India.<p>The long term consequences of having everyone (men and women) competing for the same jobs, lack of sustainable long term population demographics, removing many consequences of promiscuous sexual behavior, etc. only show up once the western approach has played out for multiple generations. Until then, it’s a way to juice the numbers.<p>They held out much longer than western society did, and society still goes to extreme lengths to attempt to restrain it, but it still has had widespread effect regardless. They still haven’t experienced the long term effects, and I bet they would love to juice the numbers more as India is a very hard place to live now.<p>They are still living with the very real pain of ‘the old approach’.<p>The even more powerful religious groups in the Middle East, and social/tribal groups in Africa, being the only ones ‘still standing’ on this front, but it’s inevitable there too.<p>Conservatism may attempt to slow the spread, but eventually even the tribal groups of mountainous Afghanistan will have to deal with the same issues that the most left wing liberal folks currently are grappling with - what is the point/long term future this is leading too?<p>The current Hedonic nihilism of a lot of folks in the west tends to not be long term self sustaining. Very addictive in the short term though!<p>It isn’t clear what is going to emerge as the alternative.<p>What would ‘children of men’ be like if the same thing was happening - but it was because of a voluntary pill or implant every woman was taking instead of some big mystery illness?
You mean the government actively scapegoating Muslims/minorities for all their problems? The Hindu nationalist party that has street militias (RSS, Bajrang Dal), anti-minority lynchings and press / university crackdowns? Sounds like a "breath of fresh air" for those on the right side of things
I know we have our issues but how blackpilled do you need to be to envy Indians... Something isn't right with this comment.
Why? What's so bad about India? Their people are young and positive, the west is ancient and past its peak. It's a very simple point actually.
I'm an Indian 1.5 gen immigrant living in the west, and I'm by no means ashamed of my Indian culture or heritage. I would never move to India and I feel sorry for many of my Indian friends or cousins living there. They are too often emotionally stunted people, and held down by India's oppressive work culture.<p>The one benefit of living in India is cheap household labour...only possible because of a massive underclass of people!
Have you ever been to India? In particular Delhi and Gurugram, and the surrounding manufacturing/industrial areas.
Both of these comments have an inaccurate view of India in either direction, too romanticized or too doomerized. In reality it's just another country with people trying to do what's best for themselves and their families.
It's in the username
> population collapse<p>There are 1.2 billion Indians.
It's clearly a massive exaggeration to talk about population collapse, but India has dropped below replacement, and will start seeing a decline in population in the next few decades, so they're heading in the same direction as everywhere else.<p>But of course that also makes blaming Modi pretty silly - <i>every</i> country sees this happening as their economic and social conditions improves. We don't know of any way of stopping it short of maybe throwing people into poverty.<p>(the only remaining places that has not <i>yet</i> dropped below replacement is sub-Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East, but they too are seeing birth rates drop).
I think we do know how to stop it: Welfare Queens, but <i>really</i>. If you can actually "live large" by doing nothing else than raising a bunch of kids (either with some controls that ensure you raise them well, and/or significant structured investment into rearing kids by the state), people will do that.<p>The reaction to that idea shows you how undervalued baby production still is. Morons insist that $20k or similar is enough incentive. It's laughable.<p>Whatever happens with AI "taking all the jobs", this will drive <i>real</i> societal change, because it has to. The options are obscene authoritarianism and removal of bodily autonomy from women so we can just force them to reproduce like society is used to, or actually adapting to what it will cost to encourage women to go through literal trauma and 20 years of really hard work because the rest of society will benefit. Seeing as de-facto enslaving all women is horrific, I hope people see that we should do everything to avoid the first option.<p>It has to become very attractive to be an average person, with average social standing, with average resources. The uber rich might have to give up some of their share of the pie.
I really don't think we do know how to stop it. Even massively increasing welfare payments has totally failed to produce lasting change where attempted.<p>It is <i>possible</i> going significantly higher could, but if so we have not yet figured out how high, and it's clear the threshold is much higher than people have tended to think it would be. E.g. look at financial incentives in Hungary, or the welfare system in places like Norway that makes parental leave in many developed countries look like third world conditions.<p>Rich people <i>do</i> seem to have a somewhat higher fertility rate, so it is possible that you could fund it enough, but the rise happens at high enough income levels I don't think our economy could handle it.<p>I agree with the rest of your comment, though - I just don't think we know if purely financial motivation would be sufficient at a level that is actually possible (and I do fear authoritarian approaches will end up being tried instead). It might take a lot more effort than that in terms of lightening the burden and/or making it more attractive in other ways.
True, let's put it this way then. In some time, there will be 1.2 billion >80 year olds and 100 million people under 18.<p>You see, I know it's hard to grasp for some, but everything is really relative.
> There are 1.2 billion Indians.<p>Incorrect. It is 1.48 billion and expected to hit 1.7+ billion in next three decades in a nation that is <1/3rd size of the USA. Birth rate collapse cannot come soon enough.
It's not the number of people but the shape of their demographic pyramid that matters.
They make surge protectors
They don't work nearly as well as the marketing says they do. They might save your equipment from a lightning strike a medium distance away, by absorbing the remnants of the surge that get to you - only once or twice before the protector is dead! - they will not save your equipment from anything that lasts longer than that.
> I wonder how many HNers recall life in Delhi even 20 years ago?<p>The only thing I know about India is from a Big Bang Theory episode where Raj's father said to Leonard when asked how's the weather, "It's hot, it's always hot in India!".
Played by Brian George, who I don't think has ever lived in India (his parents did, and he is part Indian, but he was born in Israel and grew up in London and Canada).
I personally feel fully qualified to <i>say</i> "It's always hot in India". I'm a native speaker.<p>I don't personally know that the statement is true, but if that's your issue you should be criticizing the writer, not the actor.
> I wonder how many HNers recall life in Delhi even 20 years ago?<p>I wonder how many HNers are, or ever have been there in the first place? It seems strange to me to ask who "recalls" what it was like there before. What would such a recollection be based on? There's only so much attention one can pay to what daily life is reportedly like around the world, and that required believing the reports.
At least a quarter of tech professionals in Silicon Valley are born in India. So I would guess a quarter to a third or more of the posters here are Indian origin.<p>India accounts for a big portion of the english speaking internet, so I wouldn’t be surprised if half the posters here are Indian origin.
The effort to reduce electricity theft has had an interesting side effect. One of the ways to prevent theft is to insulate the power lines going into neighborhoods. This also makes them safe for monkeys to use as 'roads' with the result that roving gangs of monkeys move from neighborhood to neighborhood with ease and also have access to the upper floor of apartment buildings because of the proximity of the power lines. I saw this in person a few years ago.
Well the planet is theirs as well, so one may argue that putting up live wires that can electrocute them is quite cruel in the first place, especially given the lack of any preservation of their natural habitats in most places.
They just need to be educated not to touch the wires. As it happens they figured it out pretty quick
Actually they could have touched the wires as long as they touched only one and nothing which was earthed, but that might be pretty complicated to learn by trial and error, especially if error often means death.
Agreed. And nothing is stopping folks from running underground cables except crying about it being more expensive (i.e the true cost vs side effects to other populations so long as it doesn’t affect the consumers).<p>It’s as though all wealth and progress hinge on taking from others.
Concerns about animal welfare are increasing and as a result are being factored into infrastructure projects. Better late than never.<p>Also it would also avoid such incidents.<p>Minister blames monkey for Sri Lanka nationwide power cut<p><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8d92n28pqjo" rel="nofollow">https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8d92n28pqjo</a><p>Infrastructure projects, whether big or small should always factor in local ecosystem. For example, highways built with with overpasses and underpasses are a great help to animals.<p><a href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/samruddhi-for-wildlife-animals-take-man-made-under/over-passes-to-crossover-their-habitats/articleshow/107637362.cms" rel="nofollow">https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/samruddhi-fo...</a>
> One of the ways to prevent theft is to insulate the power lines going into neighborhoods.<p>This is going to be less effective going forward due to insulation piercing connectors, which simply clamp around an insulated conductor and pierce the insulation to connect to the conductor underneath.<p>A suitably insane person could also just strip the insulation from a small segment of the conductor, one phase at a time, and hand wrap a splice conductor around the live one and tape it up.<p>Great news for the monkeys though! I would not want to witness a monkey making contact with two uninsulated conductors on different phases, yeesh.
India has one thing going for it, sunlight all the time.<p>India can adopt plug-in standards, solar and batteries. I guess most people use some form of battery (UPS/Inverter) anyways, so the idea is familiar.<p>Rooftop is known and it can continue to grow. Next, add vertical solar. This will add ~4 hours of solar production.<p>Required gated communities to be self sufficient or net producers. Cover the surfaces of all high rises with vertical panels. Require these communities to have BESS and EV charging for all car parking. This adds two layers of storage. BESS instead of diesel generators. Add outlet for induction stove. No need of piped gas. I've seen villa communities where most homes are net producers, these ideas are happening, need to be standardized as regulation. Easiest thing is to create standards for the gated communities, which can be enforced.<p>Don't build rural transmission infrastructure. They can be offgrid, using solar and batteries. It is not worth the cost to build and maintain transmission and distribution infrastructure to millions of small villages.<p>Work towards regulating uber/rapido to require EV cars. These drive the most miles in cities and would do wonders.<p>Lots of scope for growth.
All great points.<p>We installed a 5 kWp plant last month. Grid-tied, of course. Our daily usage is in the 12-25 kWh range depending on the season and the plant produces ~12 kWh on the worst days (~35 on the best, so far).<p>We have been doing our cooking almost exclusively on induction for the last 6-7 years, and I have been trying to get others to switch as well. However, it is difficult to convince people of the benefits. Some Indian cooking requires exposing the food directly to the flames, so piped/bottled gas cannot be completely eliminated.
Rooftop solar use had and continues to explode in most tier 2 cites where its seen as a great way to save on electricity bills by feeding that power back to the grid. Its one of the few bright spots in a country with relentless expenses and price pressures.
Great, sounds like youve planned for the 1/3 of the electrical load that residential usage represents.
How did you get that number? Is this just a quip about batteries?<p>Most of India has a solar capacity factor >0.2 and low seasonality. That means even 5kW peak rooftop panels and a 10 kWh battery will get you over 95% almost always. And panels+labor is so cheap in India, there's really no reason not to just tile the roof in panels.<p>Things get more difficult in dense cities, if you have multi story apartment blocks going 90+% locally is impossible. But then just transmit power from lower density rooftops, or actual solar farms.<p>And this already assumes widespread AC (really no way to increase electrification this much and not add AC in that climate).
1/3 of anything is a lot.
<i>Our World In Data: Installed solar energy capacity: India</i> - <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/installed-solar-pv-capacity?country=~IND" rel="nofollow">https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/installed-solar-pv-capaci...</a><p><i>India’s Clean Energy Boom Halts Coal Power Growth</i> - <a href="https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Indias-Clean-Energy-Boom-Halts-Coal-Power-Growth.html" rel="nofollow">https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Indias-Cl...</a> - September 18th, 2026<p><i>Ember Energy: India</i> - <a href="https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/india/" rel="nofollow">https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/india/</a> - Last Updated: June 4th, 2026<p><i>Ember Energy: Battery storage is now cheap enough to unleash India’s full solar potential</i> - <a href="https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/battery-storage-is-now-cheap-enough-to-unleash-indias-full-solar-potential/" rel="nofollow">https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/battery-storage-is-...</a> - April 7th, 2026 ("Ember’s analysis shows how solar and battery storage can meet as much as 90% of India’s electricity demand at lower LCOE than the average power purchase costs in most states.")<p>- Solar and batteries could supply 90% of India’s electricity demand at a competitive LCOE of around INR 5.06/kWh ($56/MWh).<p>- 4.9 GW of solar and 13.5 GWh of battery capacity for every 1 GW average demand load is enough to meet 83-92% of annual electricity demand in the ten largest states.<p>- 7 of India’s largest states by electricity demand can meet 90-92% of their demand with solar and batteries at an LCOE between INR 4.96–5.09/kWh ($55–56/MWh).<p><i>Ember Energy: India’s electrotech fast-track: where China built on coal, India is building on sun</i> - <a href="https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/indias-electrotech-fast-track-where-china-built-on-coal-india-is-building-on-sun/" rel="nofollow">https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/indias-electrotech-...</a> - January 22nd, 2026<p>- 27% of India’s electricity was generated from clean sources in 2025. It was the 3rd largest country by electricity demand.<p>- As of March 2026, India was one of only ten countries planning to triple non-fossil generation capacity from 2022 levels by 2030. By December 2025, the country had achieved 258 GW of installed renewables capacity, making progress towards its 2030 goal of 500 GW. Ember analysis suggests that, under current plans, renewables would reach 42% of generation by 2030.
> The losses in Delhi weren’t caused solely by technical problems. Theft of electricity was rampant, by both the powerful and the powerless (in both senses of the word). Businesses, residential customers, and utility employees with vested interests would siphon electricity from the grid. It was easy to illegally hook into a streetlight or a distribution line running close to one’s house or factory. Utilities didn’t have the resources to identify theft or penalize offenders.<p>In general, once "everyone" is breaking a rule, more people break the rule too. Or to put it more bluntly; if everyone is breaking a rule, you should too.
In Greece there is no incentive to fix power losses since the electric bill has a power losses line item.<p>You can steal as much as you want. The ones who pay will pay.
"The ones who pay will pay" is always true (from people using public transport without a ticket to "normal" tax payers having to shoulder the losses caused by loopholes and "incentives" for the upper 0.1%), but resigning to it so explicitly is rare.
> The ones who pay will pay.<p>Until solar panels came to liberate us from the utility overlords.
And handed us over to the mafias that collect protection money for solar panels.<p>A failed state will be fail-stating regardless of the technology.
A failed state is a funny thing. It cannot fail indefinitely and yet it persists in a limbo.
Indeed, you need to insure from the risk of brick-rain where this weather phenomenon occurs!
In places where the grid is reliable, approximately no one disconnects voluntarily from it, and solar panels are just a nice extra.<p>It is the places where the grid is failing where solar panels indeed liberate you, but not from the utility overlords, but from incompetent and corrupt governance.
I mean this is the case universally, even if the losses aren't in a specific line item the cost of generating that power has to be covered overall<p>There's usually an incentive to solve this though because this shrinkage, in retail terms, would be handled at the cost of power generated (without any profit margin) whereas if it was sold to a paying customer it'd have a margin built in. If the Greek utilities are allowed to make a profit on that losses line item, that is insane
Estonia?!<p>Much has been made of Estonia having a high tech virtual government I’d. So many high tech start ups have come from Estonia, I’m a bit stunned that they have big electricity distribution problems.
This is some kind of totally wrong reporting. Maybe some other country was meant, or the author mixed us up with Elbonia from Dilbert.<p>We do not have issues with electricity here or planned power cuts or whatever else.<p>I would like to see where this professor got his data for losses from. Maybe his data is flawed.
i dunno, if you follow the link to <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS?end=2024&most_recent_value_desc=true&start=2002" rel="nofollow">https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS?end=2024...</a> you see Estonia has high distribution losses?
> Albania, Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Estonia, India, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Uganda, and Venezuela<p>Even if Estonia does have stated electricity distribution loss, it still looks so way out of place in this group of countries by so many criteria. I wonder why not pick Egypt or Libya given that they have the same distribution loss.<p>Edit: this could be the reason - when you click on "Map" above the graph, for some reason Estonia is one of the blue countries shown on the map. Argentina, Brazil, and Kenya are there too (but not others).
<a href="https://energiatalgud.ee/V%C3%B5rgukaod%3A_elekter?category=770" rel="nofollow">https://energiatalgud.ee/V%C3%B5rgukaod%3A_elekter?category=...</a><p>'kaod' is losses, this table shows losses from bruto production.<p>Either someone has been sending wrong data to the world bank or there is some issue with interpreting them before importing to world bank.
Interestingly, this page seems to contain data only until year 2014, but the graph next to Estonia in the grandparent link does show an increase on the right side. Maybe Estonia did indeed experience some changes in overall distribution loss in recent years?
Up from about 6% in 2015-2020 according to the World Bank: <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS?locations=EE" rel="nofollow">https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS?location...</a><p>But at 2.9% according to Eesti's electricity supplier: <a href="https://www.elering.ee/en/electricity-consumption-and-generation" rel="nofollow">https://www.elering.ee/en/electricity-consumption-and-genera...</a><p>"In 2024, losses accounted for 2.9% of the total amount of electricity supplied to the transmission system." What does it all mean, who knows.
Elering reports only their part, the very high voltage transmission losses. Then there are the distribution losses on the local level are they're about 4%.<p><a href="https://www.ceer.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/3rd-CEER-Report-on-Power-Losses.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.ceer.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/3rd-CEER-Repo...</a>
I did query ChatGPT and it seemingly wrong headedly suggested that Estonia had closed lots of Oil Shale power which it did have, I am not too up on this.<p>I did push back hard saying that that's not the same as what the article talked about at all.<p>The thing is if the World Bank is making statistics people are basing decisions on this is an issue.<p>"Oh, you sweet summer child"
The article also says Brazil's "problems look like Delhi’s 25 years ago", which is very incorrect from what they're describing. Almost none of what is described in the article happened in Brazil 20 years ago, let alone today. Energy theft, for instance, happens here but at a minuscule scale compared to what's on the article.<p>I also doubt Estonia has any of these issues whatsoever, like energy theft.<p>It really seems like a vibecoded article with numbers informing incorrect conclusions. Perhaps with a dash of nationalistic pride. Unfortunate from IEEE.
As far as I can tell, that number comes from the World Bank and it defines electricity loss as a percentage of domestic production. But Estonia imports a lot of its electricity, and that imported electricity is not included on the generation side of the equation.
It may be that they over-generate currently to account for the excess losses, which would be very costly given current fuel prices unless most of it is from environmental sources.
They split from the Russian grid and it is causing growing pains. Generation is limited to oil and comprised of aging soviet era plants. They are upgrading but it takes time.
name one start up
The fact that policy changes were made should be noted. Among those policy decisions, did India make its own transformers, conductors, and SCADA, (i.e. Indian companies) or did they buy from outside? Seems like it would be better for them to source their own transformers and conductors if they can. I wonder if they'd be better off developing their own software though? Quick Google search suggests that they source from international suppliers like Schneider and Siemens.
I want to know what Singapore's grid operators have been up to. That seems to be the more interesting story based on the data in this article.
It seems to be an investment in underground distribution structures and advanced monitoring including predictive failure analysis.<p>However there's kind of a funny part to it that I read on the last page of New Scientist some years ago. According to that story, Singapore has by far the lowest rate of accidental line cuts - it's a step change to almost zero from the next best country. Apparently there's a worldwide organization that meets to discuss these things. At one meeting the Singaporean engineers presentation was eagerly anticipated but as he was going through his points the engineers from other countries were impatient - they know and do all this! Until he got to his final point: accidental line cuts in Singapore result in 10-year prison sentence. Hence the difference.
Singapore is also a 730 km^2 island city-state with a population of about 6.2 million people. I have honestly no idea why people and articles keep comparing it to literally <i>the largest countries on the planet</i> both in terms of land area and population. Ask any other wealthy cosmopolitan world city of about the same area and population what their electricity reliability figures are, and the answers will probably be quite similar.<p>Inb4 (in this case in-after) trope answers (see below) like 'veneer of perfectly clean and orderly society', 'punitive'. <i>It is small</i>; that is why it can get stuff done.
Singapore is a very small city. Distribution losses are linear with distance!
I grew up in Delhi during the 90s. We used to have daily power cuts but starting around year 2000 (can't pin exact year), we started having less outages. Since around 2006, we had almost no outages throughout the year. Now, I haven't experienced a power outage in a long time in Delhi
So basically theft and fixing overloaded infra. So this is policy based solutions for the most part.<p>Amazing that places have 50% power loss.
In Hyderabad, India the govt loses around 2 million kWh per day(roughly 50-60 million USD per year) in theft and unpaid electricity bills every year particularly the old city area where residents refuse to pay the bills.<p>Bill collectors are openly threatened by local elected leaders even in the presence of police.<p>The state chief minister(similar to a governor) acknowledged the problem and is planning to handover bill collection to a private firm specifically for that part of the city. The opposition is against the move as the area represents a major voting bloc.<p>Sometimes, policy based solutions work but political will is also necessary to enforce those policies.
I bet much of the savings is from reducing theft. 50 percent is too much for transmission losses.<p>In the industry, transmission and distribution losses are called T&D losses. Pretty much all unaccounted losses will be written off as T&D losses. Often the right expansion for T&D losses is Theft and Decoity losses :-)
I was curious if the price per unit of electricity has also changed over this time period, looks like that's been pretty much flat: <a href="https://ibb.co/8DLPn25D" rel="nofollow">https://ibb.co/8DLPn25D</a><p>(I assume consumption per customer has probably gone up)
One key factor not directly mentioned in the article is the simple alignment of financial incentives when electricity distribution was privatized. Before privatization, the agencies responsible for collecting electricity bills had little incentive to actually perform the collection. When coupled with rampant corruption, you get a situation where a lot of bills are either getting unpaid or not even being generated and just being written off as transmission and distribution losses. Switching to private distribution immediately aligns the incentives of the distributor to actually bill their customers for the electricity they are using. None of this is meant to take away from the value of the technical and policy work that led to improvements, and I'm sure all of the factors called out in the article also contributed to this change.
> In areas where theft was particularly rampant and losses were as high as 83 percent, according to Tata, the companies took a different strategy. These pockets of Delhi were predominantly occupied by low-income families. Tata Power, and later BSES, worked to improve the water supply for these residents and provide educational opportunities, such as instruction in reading and writing in Hindi as well as financial literacy. These efforts focused on the women, who were at home more, and paid them to collect electricity payments from their neighbors. Bill payment rates from these areas are now on par with those of other parts of Delhi<p>This is... interesting on multiple levels.
The next 25 years will see another revolution, the solar residential (and hopefully commercial one) <a href="https://pmsuryaghar.gov.in/#/" rel="nofollow">https://pmsuryaghar.gov.in/#/</a><p>The government is actively encouraging solar residential and net metering is on...<p>Since the topic is linked to Delhi..<p>In dino, garche dakkan mein hain kadre sukhan bahut,<p>Kaun jaye Zauq, par dilli ki galiya chodd ke<p>The poet acknowledges that the Deccan region (South India) currently offers better patronage and respect for poets than the declining Delhi. However, he rhetorically asks who could possibly bear to leave Delhi....
Personally a Ghalib fan myself but love that despite their rivalry they both loved dilli to the end.
The power companies will just say that if they let everyone do that, it will kill line technicians and boom, no one gets solar. Happening in the USA today
Surprised to see my former university director/lecturer appear on HN. She (the author) was very controversial and general not liked towards the end of her tenure by most of my peers. Nonetheless, she was quite good in her field.
Well written. It describes the problem at a fairly high level for engineers to understand and for lay people to see how public policy works when it does.
That’s quite the achievement. Though a side note of comparison I can’t believe France and Belgium suffer power losses in the 5 to 6% range. Unless I’m misunderstanding what that means, it seems excessive for a modern economy.
You can't easily move energy from one place to another without losing some of it: <a href="https://www.ceer.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/3rd-CEER-Report-on-Power-Losses.pdf#page=21" rel="nofollow">https://www.ceer.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/3rd-CEER-Repo...</a> That doesn't necessarily result in power outages, though.
To me transformation efficiency and distance losses actually seem to make 5-6% pretty impressive?
30 years ago my local electric co-op was bragging they got transmission losses down to 4%, when the rest of US was 8% (I'm not sure if that is average or some other statistical term).<p>But yes, transmission losses exist and are surprisingly large
every step in the chain loses power. You lose power just in the power lines. Every trip through a transformer adds some more loss<p>Reducing the number of transformers, raising the high side of system voltage, and increasing conductor sizes are all ways to reduce the transmission losses. of course each of those requires investments so that's why it can be variable and also something to brag about
It's mostly about the distance, isn't it? Iirc even with the most modern ultra high voltage lines, it's about 3% per 1000km. Which honestly doesn't sound too bad, even for really long distances (like solar power from some desert to where people actually live).
Distance is a factor. I do not know what they were measuring (the main power plant was about 1000km away, but I don't know if they counted that or if that was ignored because someone else owned those lines). They were a fairly rural utility with most of the area belonging to farmers (but they do have a couple suburbs and a few small towns).<p>I don't know the real details, but my educated guess is they raised the voltage, and also they used 3x as many wires (running 3 phase past every house even though almost everybody only used 1 phase). That is I can visually see their insulators on the power posts are larger than neighboring utilities which allows for higher voltage (but may or may not mean higher voltages were used). Likewise I can see the 3 lines on each power pole while neighboring utilities only used one. It is hard to tell from the ground but I suspect they used thicker wires as well.
> I can’t believe France and Belgium suffer power losses in the 5 to 6% range.<p>Is the juice worth the squeeze?<p>For some problems, the closer you get to perfection, the harder the next step is.
It’s where you’ll find most countries with a good handle on their electric network, advanced economies or not. You can do better but it requires either very small service distances (so you don’t have transmission losses in the first place) or an extreme dedication to hunting them down.
I'm not sure what that percentage means, but power-cuts in Belgium are extremely rare.
Czechia is at 5-6 per cent as well, even though our grid companies are quite good. This is the price for having rural areas. Within a single compact city, like Singapore, you can get under 1 per cent easily. One the distances grow to hundreds of kilometers, some non-negligible loss is inevitable.
I don't think that number is correct?<p>In the 39 years I live here, the only power loss was due to lightning or planned power cuts because of work in the building where I live in the last 9 years ( rare - twice).<p>There is however incentive for our high chemistry industry to cut the power and they get re-imbursed. This is when we have too much electricity production ( solar power) vs. consumption. Otherwise the providers have to pay "fines" to lose the overproduction of electricity to neigboring countries ( who probably all have overproduction of electricity).
5-6 percent of electricity loss just mean that 5-6 percent of the electricity produced by all power plants in your country never reach the customer. Not that you have blackouts 5-6 percent of the time.<p>As of now, we cannot do lossless transmission. If some Ultragrok comes with room-pressure and room-temperature superconductors, then maybe.
It's embarrassing that it took so long. India has been crippled by decades of socialist government overreach. Unfortunately, even the purportedly right wing BJP is unable to keep the government out of places where it doesn't belong.
The privatisation of Delhi power distribution was initiated by a Congress state government in 2000.
I am aware. The initial privatization push was initiated by Congress in 1991! My lament is that privatization has remained anemic, even under the so-called right wing BJP.<p>But you should also acknowledge that national electrical reform was done by BJP. The real problem for Indian politics was the re-entry of the Gandhi nepo-baby dynasty. We would be a lot better off if they hadn't gotten their claws back into the INC.
Privatization doesn't fix shit. Competition does. A private monopoly is just as bad as the government.
It's not surprising. For one, stated vs actual goals always differ and someone needs pockets to reach into. For the other, plenty of countries that listened to orgs like the World Bank saying "privatise everything immediately and reap the benefits!" just ended up handing the assets to cronies. Examples like Russia are of course well-known, but it's obviously happening under BJP in India as well.
It's once again lamentable, but somewhat predictable that even on a post about how privatization fixed, in five years, a problem that persisted for 50, you insist on spreading boogeyman tales about privatization. The Indian government is what American libertarians are afraid of, and in their defense, they should be afraid.
Boogeyman? Is the outcome of the World Bank's insistence on "structural adjustments" somehow in debate now?<p>I was in Delhi when this started and they began laying out the tamper-proof cable back in the early 2000s. At that time, railway food had been privatised, perhaps you recall. It wasn't better. The problem was not the privatisation or lack thereof, it was the complete lack of accountability.
I'm not referring to the World Bank, but rather the idea that BJP's privatization push is somehow benefiting cronies. This is a widely reported accusation by the INC, but like most of their accusations, it seems to be a matter of slinging mud at the wall and seeing what sticks.<p>Part of accountability is the possibility for failure and the associated consequences. PSUs have no fear of failure, since they're fundamentally parasitic, living as they are on the tax receipts of the beleaguered middle class. Private industry either increases efficiency to the point of profit, or goes under, simple as. Show me the incentive, and I'll show you the results!<p>Of course, if there is complete government capture by industry, then there is no more risk of failure, and you have privatized PSUs. But let's say this, from 1947-1991, India traded the British for the IAS. Hardly much of an improvement. The only way to reduce their power is to transfer it to the private sector, outside of areas where the utility of the activity is all externality (e.g. defense, scientific research). We have to move in this direction or risk returning to the License Raj era. Perhaps this will create more problems, but at least our children won't curse us for leaving them with our parents' problems.
We're going to go back to the original point you made that you don't understand why privatisation is going so slowly. And I will reiterate that there are good and bad reasons. The bad reasons are visible, like Adani winning every coal tender in every BJP state, or the contractors (privatised) who make shit roads so they can then get paid to repair them. The good reasons are the ones I stated and you've touched on - you don't just give away the family jewels, you make sure that the recipient is strongly incentivised to do a better job. Just "oh they need to make money so it will be better" is too nebulous to mean anything. What is the incentive for a railway caterer to do a better job if he won't get pulled up for substandard food?<p>Saw the same thing playing out in public transport in a few different countries, incidentally. London railways are a particularly hilarious example of what happens when you privatise without proper accountability.
Speaking of the IAS, my grandfather went smoothly from being an honest and principled ICS officer to being an IAS one. A contractor had his mother murdered because he wouldn't take a bribe for an illegal transport licence. That had nothing to do with socialism or capitalism, and neither ism will magically fix a society where that barely raises an eyebrow.
> you insist on spreading boogeyman tales about privatization<p>Dude, you're the one coming across as a zealot here.
True it should never have gotten so bad, but when there is no incentive to invest, this is the result you can expect. This happened in Venezuela and South Africa too - though SA also suffers from massive corruption (officials pocketing moneys and diverting from investment in infra).
The BJP is marginally less socialist than the Congress. On the positive side, they are definitely less corrupt than the Congress.
Really? The recent headlines would suggest otherwise.
Has the Congress moved to the right?<p>The License Raj prior to 1991 was pretty socialist, and it was a Congress policy.
> India has been crippled by decades of socialist government overreach.<p>It baffles me that country still has strong anti-capitalist views. I guess lack of education does that to people.<p>Also, BJP is slightly right of Congress (post 1991) when it comes to economics.
Being to the right of the current INC is not an achievement. The only people not in that position are Maoists.<p>Anyway, I think it's reasonable to be suspicious of the wealthy and powerful. For instance, I personally quite dislike our new AI ruling class. But unfortunately, in India there was an attitude since independence that it is impossible to generate wealth in a legitimate manner. Which is going way too far! And has predictably bad outcomes for the country.
> It baffles me that...<p>While the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company</a> was, <i>as a broad generality</i>, not nearly so vile as (say) the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_colonization_of_the_Americas" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_colonization_of_the_Am...</a>, it certainly didn't leave many Indians with a favorable impression of European-style capitalism.
Definitely not nearly as vile. It certainly wasn't perfect, particularly things like the awful penal colonies, but jump-starting a giant civilisation, say, 1000+ years into the future is not straightforward either. India is experiencing a rise in nationalism, but would do well to imagine the counterfactual of what India would be like had Europe never visited.
> jump-starting a giant civilisation, say, 1000+ years into the future is not straightforward either<p>The various East India companies went to India (and the other east Indies) because those places had things rich Europeans desired - spices yes, but also high-end, high-quality textiles and handcrafted items. They were already the height of civilization and had high economic productivity.<p>> would do well to imagine the counterfactual of what India would be like had Europe never visited<p>It would probably not be one country. Best case scenario: like a South Asian EU. Why do you think they wouldn't have copied European industrialization and developed themselves? Japan did it. Turkey did it.<p>Speaking of Japan, isn't it interesting that the first Asian country to industrialize is also one of the only Asian countries never colonized by Europeans? Why do people still believe colonization was good for economic development?
> Speaking of Japan, ...<p>IIR, Japan was a pretty xenophobic, unified, and militarized place when the Europeans showed up. And without either reputed or obvious Tier 1 riches - such as Central & South America's precious metals - to motivate a hard-fought conquest. Especially when 'most everywhere else in South & East Asia was <i>comparatively</i> easy pickings.<p>> Why do people still believe ...<p>Because, <i>if you use sufficiently Eurocentric metrics</i>, it usually was. And picking those metrics feels pretty good, if you identify uncomfortably closely with that sort of capitalism.
> Japan was a pretty xenophobic, unified, and militarized place when the Europeans showed up.<p>Other than unified, that describes most places in the 15th or 16th century.<p>> Because, if you use sufficiently Eurocentric metrics, it usually was.<p>The one country in Asia* to not suffer colonialism (Japan) is way ahead of all the others that did have it, <i>especially on "Eurocentric" metrics</i> such as GDP and productivity and democracy and human rights. That alone should be a rebuke to colonialism's purported development powers.<p>* Arguably Thailand is another but it was forced to cede land to colonial powers. It too is considerably richer than its immediate neighbors.
<i>The one country in Asia to not suffer colonialism (Japan) is way ahead of all the others that did have it, especially on "Eurocentric" metrics such as GDP and productivity and democracy and human rights. That alone should be a rebuke to colonialism's purported development powers.</i><p>I don't think this is a good example, given the actual modern history of Japan.<p>Contemporary Japanese democracy and respect for human rights aren't indigenous Japanese developments. They were literally forced on Japan by the victorious Americans after the homegrown Japanese militarist empire, which didn't GAF about either, catastrophically lost a major war.
Industrialization wasn't an "indigenous Japanese development" either. Other than Britain, every country had to import the industrial revolution.<p>Japan could only start that war because of its early industrialization. Colonies didn't start WW2.<p>In an alternate historical timeline where Japan industrializes but doesn't start the war? It would need to have had less militaristic and xenophobic leadership in the early 20th century than it did in our timeline. And IMO that would've led to more democracy* and human rights anyway over time.<p>*Important to note: Even pre-WW2 Japan went from absolute monarchy to a semi-constitutional monarchy, with suffrage for all adult males granted in 1925.
> jump-starting a giant civilisation, say, 1000+ years into the future is not straightforward either.<p>Not sure what you are suggesting here.
> It baffles me that country still has strong anti-capitalist views.<p>I wouldn't call the "license raj" of India as anti-capitalist.
India arguably has the strongest of institutions of all the countries in South Asia.
However, even its institutions and regulations are pathetically weak.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster</a><p>You probably also saw a previous post right here on this orange website
when someone tried to repatriate their business money outside of India.
It was painful just to read that they had to get approvals
from iirc sixteen different government agencies
to get their own money that they brought in from outside of India back.
Not profits, not proceeds, a fraction of what they put in.<p>Neither of these two cases is due to "anti-capitalist" views of India.
If you look at what was India before Moghul rule and British rule,
you could argue India has never been socialist before.<p>I think workers everywhere should have "strong anti-capitalist views",
because unrestrained capitalism is just anarchy.
I think that's a bad read of Indian institutions. They are incredibly powerful - in fact, they are far too powerful. That's the problem. The license raj is the epitome of authoritarian, centralized political and economic power. I suppose it was justified on socialist grounds, but it would be fair to say that saying so doesn't make it so! Before 91, nothing, and I mean nothing, could happen without government say-so.<p>The problem with Indian institutions is that they are far too powerful, centralized and bureaucratic. Just read the article - the problem was created by a lazy, corrupt, powerful and centralized bureaucratic system. The solution was to dismantle it and decentralize power.
I apologize I am not very good at expressing myself.
Could India be better?
Of course!
Anyone can be better than what they are.
Like a fish that lives in water doesn't ever think about water,
an Indian living in India does not think about the absurdity
of how powerful a District Collector / District Magistrate (DM) / Deputy Commissioner (DC) is in contemporary India.<p>> I think that's a bad read of Indian institutions. They are incredibly powerful - in fact, they are far too powerful. That's the problem. The license raj is the epitome of authoritarian, centralized political and economic power. I suppose it was justified on socialist grounds, but it would be fair to say that saying so doesn't make it so! Before 91, nothing, and I mean nothing, could happen without government say-so.
> The problem with Indian institutions is that they are far too powerful, centralized and bureaucratic. Just read the article - the problem was created by a lazy, corrupt, powerful and centralized bureaucratic system. The solution was to dismantle it and decentralize power.<p>What you are saying is absolutely true.
the bureaucracy in India is absolutely lazy, corrupt, powerful, and centralized.
It is also arguably one of the biggest reasons why India has never had a (successful) military coup.
You could even argue the inefficiency and the sluggishness of the bureaucracy is a feature and not a defect.
I think this is a self-deprecating canard that's oft-repeated, but I think fails the credibility test and encourages a kind of fatalistic resigned attitude among Indians. Are we to take from this that efficient bureaucracies lead inevitably to coups? Is the pathetic state of most African countries a result of their stellar bureaucracies?
This is going to get a lot of press and it does not mention any ministers or government services. The guy who wrote it is getting transferred in a week.
They don't mean "loss" but "outages" if I read it correctly.
tldr; they passed the administration of power from the corrupt government officials to Tata power (part of the Tata conglomerate) and BSES (part of another conglomerate Reliance). They modernized the setup and closed loopholes and avenues of corruption and also made stealing of power by the corrupt sections of public difficult.
Vajpayee FTW?
[flagged]
[dead]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
This is because of the Modi government pro development agenda which is also what pushed India to the 21st century (and beyond).<p>Although they were some mistakes his government made all in all it’s been a huge success compared to the previous administrations in India.