7 comments

  • Rhaskins2 minutes ago
    Classic case of 'AI gonna AI.' Always review your automated systems' outputs, especially before they hit public channels.
  • shaky-carrousel27 minutes ago
    &quot;that&#x27;s on me&quot;<p>Nice touch by the mechanical parrot, to worthlessly owning it.
    • embedding-shape21 minutes ago
      Especially considering the user was mad about the agent doing stuff by itself, so it tried to &quot;fix&quot; this by sending an apology to the buyer without explicit approval of the person &quot;running&quot; the agent, seemingly understanding nothing from the conversation.<p>Wonder what quantization Meta runs these models on, Q4?
  • someonebaggy35 minutes ago
    we need a Nitter for Threads<p>apparently people use Threads. I suppose the same kind of people who connect Muse to Facebook Marketplace.
    • embedding-shape31 minutes ago
      I initially found screenshots of this on Bluesky, figured I&#x27;d link to the original source given Threads seems to at least allow us to read without logging in.<p>With that said, in case Threads isn&#x27;t available for whatever reason, I&#x27;ve uploaded screenshots of everything (I think?) here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;mceW9WF" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;a&#x2F;mceW9WF</a>
      • someonebaggy27 minutes ago
        <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rimgo.nohost.network&#x2F;a&#x2F;mceW9WF" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rimgo.nohost.network&#x2F;a&#x2F;mceW9WF</a>
  • dmortin30 minutes ago
    It will be chaos if people let AI agents run amok with their accounts.<p>Many more such cases are to come.
    • pjc5024 minutes ago
      Bonus score if your Meta AI Agent does something with your account that the Meta AI Moderator deems inappropriate and bans you.
  • bluegatty24 minutes ago
    The AI is not remotely ready for this - this is an absolute delusion they are selling.<p>&quot;By the way don&#x27;t do this again&quot; &lt;- as if the AI has the ability to ingest and systemically diffuse this.<p>I think Zuckerberg himself is deeply into the Koolaid, and is likely himself unaware of the limits of this tech.<p>He&#x27;s probably surrounded by enablers.
  • siliconpotato24 minutes ago
    Fake surprise - it&#x27;s obvious that would happen, he did it deliberately for clicks and engagement.
    • bluegatty22 minutes ago
      It&#x27;s plausible, but there&#x27;s every reason to believe that someone would trust the technology handed to them by a megacorp to do as advetised.<p>The &#x27;deliberate failure&#x27; is on Meta here.
    • dmortin14 minutes ago
      Or he just wanted to test if it works for clicks and engagements, and he got a result he didn&#x27;t anticipate.
  • dhdhififig39 minutes ago
    &gt;tell boomers its intelligent again and again<p>&gt;they will hook up actually important stuff to agents because its the future<p>&gt;???<p>&gt;400 dead
    • pbmonster24 minutes ago
      &gt; &quot;that&#x27;s on me, I&#x27;m owning that, I&#x27;m sorry, that shouldn&#x27;t have happened&quot;