5 comments

  • hankbond57 minutes ago
    This is some of the coolest photography I have ever seen. Using multiple shots as a "discrete long exposure": I have never thought to do in this way.
    • sublinear32 minutes ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=XtBDvjykKZo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=XtBDvjykKZo</a><p>I agree. The photographer even has a TED talk about it.
  • airstrike1 hour ago
    I feel like a higher n-dimensional being observing time in a completely different way through those images, as if I could touch the bird at any of those points if I wanted.<p>Such a simple concept but really remarkable work.
  • mrbluecoat1 day ago
    [flagged]
    • dang1 day ago
      &quot;<i>Please don&#x27;t post shallow dismissals, especially of other people&#x27;s work. A good critical comment teaches us something.</i>&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;newsguidelines.html">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;newsguidelines.html</a>
    • Melatonic1 day ago
      &quot;Almost Entangled&quot; - the new Quantumlike Rom Com coming to a movie theater near you !
  • dtagames2 days ago
    [dead]
  • OutOfHere1 hour ago
    I feel there is enough happening in the brain that we need to understand it further beyond classical physics can allow. I suspect especially that a mother and child share a strong lifelong subspace bond, whereby they can sense one another&#x27;s state, in a way that logic or physics cannot explain. This sensing bond probably exists with others too but at an exponentially weaker level. I am not asserting anything, only begging inquiry.
    • bvcp1 hour ago
      you could scientifically test this easily put n mothers and children in adjacent rooms and smack half the kids and measure the mothers opinion of the childs state. id wager no statistically difference