US everything has become unappetizing for everyone outside the US.
And many of us inside the US as well, tbf.
This is nonsense. The rest of the world holds 9.7 Trillion in Treasuries and this amount increased by $500 billion over the last year.<p>So the opposite of this article is true. You can get all the data from the Z.1 release.<p>Please don't take these types of flame bait articles seriously or try to spin up an entire world view based on them as you will end up not only directionally wrong, but believe in the exact opposite of reality.<p>FYI, that $500B increase in treasury holdings is not the whole picture, there are also the agencies (housing mortage backed securities guaranteed by the govt) and foreign holdings of those also increased by $70 billion over the last year, and are about 1.5 Trillion.
Sure, the engines may have died, but not only is the plane still airborne, it's even accelerating!
View looks great from up here. Any peanuts?
gravity... is working against me... dream of ways... to throw it all away...<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VBex8zbDRs" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VBex8zbDRs</a>
Institutional investors are very slow to adapt, so I wouldn't take their continued investment as a positive signal. The sentiment shift is real, and a lot of goodwill has been spent.<p>It's basically divide and conquer on a national scale tearing down the democratic world police and the democratic systems it supported.
The point is that the entire article is wrong, factually.<p>In terms of institutional investors and sentiment, I think you are fundamentally not understanding why the rest of the world holds US debt, it is to support running trade surpluses. That is a core economic need of much of the world, and as long as there is that need, you will see foreign government accumulation of dollar denominated assets.<p>For some reason people either refuse to understand simple balance of payment accounting constraints or they are deeply offended by them, and want to live in a world in which moral outrage determines things like global capital flows.<p>But we do not live in that world. The reason why the rest of the world accumulated a trillion of dollar denominated assets last year, split roughly 50/50 between private and public, is solely because China needed to run a trillion dollar trade surplus. And next year it will also need to run an even bigger surplus. That forces everything else.
Exorbitant privilege is a gift that lasts only as long as the trust does.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorbitant_privilege" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorbitant_privilege</a><p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635834">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635834</a> covers this succinctly:<p>> America was in practice running an empire that collected tribute from the rest of planet earth in exchange for entries in a database denominated in a currency they controlled and that was accepted everywhere. Really the only way it could go wrong is putting it under the control of someone who doesn't understand the kayfabe...<p>from<p><i>Gold overtakes U.S. Treasuries as the largest foreign reserve asset</i> - <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635056">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47635056</a> - April 2026 (250 comments)
This argument fundamentally does not make sense. Look at a chart of U.S. GDP per capita growth: <a href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zSCw!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fafa99d7e-749e-4e36-bf66-b4a7a043613e_2048x1249.png" rel="nofollow">https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zSCw!,f_auto,q_auto:...</a><p>The U.S. was growing at the same rate or faster as the UK from 1830 to 1930, when the UK had an empire and the U.S. didn’t. Then, in the second half of the 20th century when the U.S. had an empire and the UK didn’t, the growth rates were more or less the same in both places in the long run trend (ignoring the UK’s step change hit from WWII).
[dead]
Imagine, even Apple is moving itself to the shitlist.
Looking at the graphs in the article, I don't think the overall picture supports the headline...
I was dismissive when I saw the title, but they have real statistics: foreign holdings are at 2012 levels while total treasuries outstanding are 3x larger.
Holdings have increased by $500 billion over the last year. Why cherry pick 2012? Because that was in the aftermath of QE from the great recession and foreign holdings of treasuries were enormous as they rotated out of US private debt and sought the safety of treasuries. Today it is risk on, relatively speaking.<p>These go up and down based on cash management needs and portfolio allocation choices between public and private debt, and so you can pick one year when cash management needs were high or appetite for riskier were low. And then count on people being dupes, LOL.
treasuries are the same as cash. All that means is there is still too much USD Money supply from QE and rates will continue to go higher to reduce the supply.
The issue (real issue?) is that it’s unclear whether these governments reduced their holdings or switched them to these opaque structures (tether can be considered one). The idea is, it would be hard for the US to untangle true ownership. I wonder if UBO was getting undone blue or red because it’s a real threat for such a system but the US needs this “second” lifeline.
Thanks, Trump.
US policy:<p>1. print money<p>2. suppress wages by shipping in cheap labor<p>3. reassure the population you arent doing the above
Yes, that's called Quantitative Easing after the Global Financial Crisis. The peak in the graph was 2008 after which the US issues a shit ton of debt which was bought by the Fed. China used to be the biggest holder of US Treasuries but now it's the Federal Reserve and Japan.<p>But the idea that you look at that graph as say it's "unappetizing" is dumb. Most foreign governments besides China have INCREASED their UST holdings. The only reason why the % is dropping is because of the massive amount bought by the Fed which messed up the %.
Every graph of foreign ownership is up and to the left over the last 10 years<p><a href="https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-holdings-canada" rel="nofollow">https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-...</a><p><a href="https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-holdings-uk" rel="nofollow">https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-...</a><p><a href="https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-holdings-belgium" rel="nofollow">https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-...</a><p>Only China has gone down:<p><a href="https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-holdings-china" rel="nofollow">https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-...</a><p>I stand corrected about Japan it looks like they've been flat over the last 10+ YEARS<p><a href="https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-holdings-japan" rel="nofollow">https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/foreign-treasury-...</a><p>Basically the article linked above is dumb, and they either are stupid and don't understand what they're talking about or trying to cast a false narrative
China also has not gone down, they are merely shifting their ownership structures. China accumulated over a trillion in dollar denominated assets last year, but rumors are the big players have been Chinese regional banks. It's a byzantine mess of hidden ownership structures over there.
If true, this would change the narrative. But I wouldn’t base anything on rumors. China is also rapidly building its supply of bullion and is attempting to shift trade away from the USD, so it would make sense for it to be drawing down on USD reserves. (Not that it will ever eliminate those reserves completely.)
Yeah ... and exactly how many of our treasury auctions have failed? Zero. Overbid by foreign parties, all of them.
Exactly. Same as when Bessent wanted to buy 6B in long bonds but only bought 5.XB, people said that it failed but anyone who understands knows that it's the opposite. The oversubscription rate is normally 3X or more but this time it was 2X which means that people would rather keep their long bonds, which shows confidence in them.
I think RoW is trying to send a message to certain US constituents.
Please don't make us decode your acronym
<a href="https://www.acronymfinder.com/ROW.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.acronymfinder.com/ROW.html</a>
RoW = Rest of World?<p>If so, those constituencies are immune to facts and common sense.