2 comments

  • novacrazy38 minutes ago
    How this scam language gained traction is beyond me.
    • orsenthil16 minutes ago
      The book about the language was published by packt, and I had my eyebrows raised. I want to give a benefit of doubt tough and learn more.
    • ecto37 minutes ago
      How can a language be a scam?
      • novacrazy25 minutes ago
        The first release was just Go&#x27;s parser ripped out and bolted onto a barebones first year of college level compiler, and touted as &quot;safer than Rust&quot;, &quot;compiles in milliseconds&quot;, etc. but didn&#x27;t even have real type-checking at the time, nor did it free memory, and many other basic functionality. Furthermore, I vividly remember the author&#x27;s Patreon advertised at the top of the page back then, and for a while he raked in a couple thousand dollars a month for it.<p>However, over the years some actually talented people (and nowadays probably LLMs) have somehow sort of fixed most of the biggest warts, but it&#x27;s still nowhere near what it advertised in that first release.
        • giancarlostoro14 minutes ago
          What&#x27;s wild is I was looking at the language&#x27;s home page again, and looking to find their GitHub, the first GitHub link I noticed, is the GitHub sponsors link.<p>I don&#x27;t mind supporting a project like this, but this is a bit excessive.<p>Was it really Go&#x27;s parser? That wouldn&#x27;t surprise me, but also that kind of makes sense to me why it looked a bit &#x27;familiar&#x27; in terms of syntax.<p>It&#x27;s definitely been &quot;alpha&quot; tier for a while, which it doesnt help that the developer doesn&#x27;t outline any sort of stability that I can recall (back then at least) which imho if you&#x27;re publishing a language, you should let the reader know.
        • torstenvl10 minutes ago
          Can you explain what you mean by this? They haven&#x27;t had a first release yet. They&#x27;re still in beta.
          • novacrazy6 minutes ago
            That&#x27;s being pedantic. The first public announcement was many years ago.
            • torstenvl4 minutes ago
              It <i>appears</i> you&#x27;re calling something a scam because an early alpha version was early alpha quality. If so, that would be unprofessional and inflammatory.<p>I&#x27;m open to being wrong. So again, can you explain what you mean?
        • morpheos13714 minutes ago
          Lol this is interesting. If you want to make money you can &quot;invent&quot; a language. With LLMs you could probably make it pretty decent too.
      • MisterTea30 minutes ago
        I have no opinion on the subject but I have found this to be an interesting dive into the supposed controversy: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;justinas.org&#x2F;the-bizarre-world-of-v" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;justinas.org&#x2F;the-bizarre-world-of-v</a>
    • ape434 minutes ago
      This seems to be the language&#x27;s main page <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vlang.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vlang.io&#x2F;</a>
    • embedding-shape28 minutes ago
      For reference, for the ones who aren&#x27;t aware of the constant drama that seems to follow V: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?dateRange=all&amp;page=0&amp;prefix=true&amp;query=v%20lang%20comments%3E10&amp;sort=byPopularity&amp;type=story" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?dateRange=all&amp;page=0&amp;prefix=true&amp;que...</a> (open up almost any discussion and see the flood of similar messages).<p>I never paid enough attention to figure out if the drama is justified or not (and don&#x27;t really care either, please don&#x27;t try to convince me to care either, don&#x27;t shoot the messenger).
    • IshKebab3 minutes ago
      Yeah it seems to be following the No Man&#x27;s Sky playbook.
  • foul42 minutes ago
    How are things going with V btw? In the past i&#x27;ve seen some bad press about this programming language.<p>It was nice to use when I tried to dabble with it.