6 comments

  • jjice33 minutes ago
    It blows my mind that parents let their children use these platforms with these safety features.<p>I just found out yesterday that my cousin lets their 5ish year old have a TikTok account, but they have to allow or deny anyone who follows. How absurd is that. It doesn&#x27;t block anything about what they view (I assume they relied on this safety feature), and there&#x27;s no way that vetting who can follow (family and friends) is safe enough. The alternative is my younger cousin not having access to TikTok at five years old. Seems like a completely fine alternative.<p>I imagine the average person just doesn&#x27;t think about the potential implications of giving your child a TikTok account at that age.
    • izzydata20 minutes ago
      5 years old is crazy, but by the time they are 15-16 it becomes difficult to restrict them from things their peers all do. There needs to be a wider push from all parents or more of a consensus from society that these platforms are dangerous.
      • Grombobulous12 minutes ago
        Yes, the platforms need to be regulated more for minors.<p>But also, prohibition has never been a very effective method with teens.<p>Just look at how college kids drink when they get to college. The sudden removal of parental restriction has a lot to do with that if you ask me.<p>I think this is better approached with broad education, and stronger regulations on the platforms themselves.<p>Part of the problem is that many parents aren’t educated themselves about what is good and bad for their kids. Examples include things like nutrition, screen time, even simple stuff like when to wean from bottles and keeping suffocation risks out of cribs.
        • Forgeties796 minutes ago
          &gt; Part of the problem is that many parents aren’t educated themselves about what is good and bad for their kids. Examples include things like nutrition, screen time, even simple stuff like when to wean from bottles and keeping suffocation risks out of cribs.<p>I would argue that more is being asked now of parents than in previous decades at least. You’re asking every parent to fight multi-billion dollar international addiction platforms <i>on top of</i> working, parenting, etc.
  • consensus11 minute ago
    There&#x27;s only 3 options for the internet:<p>1. free for all<p>2. locked down with ID checked age gates<p>3. sanitized with no adult content at all<p>If we put responsibility for keeping kids safe on companies we will get 2 or 3. The only good option is that parents need to actually parent their kids.
  • pmdr6 minutes ago
    TikTok isn&#x27;t even safe for adults, let alone children.
  • tolugenius54 minutes ago
    &gt; Liu also said Texas had established that TikTok&#x27;s &quot;Restricted Mode&quot; did not work as advertised and exposed minors to content the company said would be filtered out.<p>I don&#x27;t use tiktok, can someone explain what the restrict mode was advertised as vs does? If it&#x27;s like any social media limiter it&#x27;s perhaps a softer thing (time limit) than a hard thing (ie, designed to put the onus on the user).
    • foolswisdom41 minutes ago
      &gt; The State’s second argument concerns TikTok’s representations about whether its “Restricted Mode” feature effectively filtered out content that might be inappropriate for minors. TikTok claimed that Restricted Mode “limits the appearance of content that may not be appropriate for all audiences” and that users “shouldn’t see mature or complex themes,” such as “profanity,” “sexually suggestive content,” “realistic violence or threatening imagery,” “firearms or weapons in an environment that isn’t appropriate,” “illegal or controlled substances&#x2F;drugs,” and “explicit references to mature or complex themes that may reflect personal experiences or real-world events that are intended for older audiences.” For years, the State argues, TikTok employees internally recognized that Restricted Mode was not functioning in the way it was marketed and exposed users to a high volume of content that should have been filtered out.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.texasattorneygeneral.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;images&#x2F;press&#x2F;TikTok%201%20Ruling.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.texasattorneygeneral.gov&#x2F;sites&#x2F;default&#x2F;files&#x2F;ima...</a>
    • ketzu45 minutes ago
      Based on their faq: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tiktok.com&#x2F;support&#x2F;faq_detail?category=web_account&amp;id=7543604784121731590&amp;lang=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tiktok.com&#x2F;support&#x2F;faq_detail?category=web_accou...</a><p>&gt; You shouldn&#x27;t see mature or complex themes, such as:<p>&gt; • Profanity<p>&gt; • Sexually suggestive content<p>&gt; • Realistic violence or threatening imagery<p>&gt; • Firearms or weapons in an environment that isn&#x27;t appropriate<p>&gt; • Illegal or controlled substances&#x2F;drugs<p>&gt; • Explicit references to mature or complex themes that may reflect personal experiences or real-world events that are intended for older audiences<p>It is clearly described as a content filter. (It also deactivates gifting on live and &quot;following&quot; feed.)
    • ljf46 minutes ago
      From TikTok:<p>What Is Restricted Mode? Restricted Mode limits videos that may not be right for all viewers. It filters out mature or complex themes. Some features like LIVE videos and the Following feed are hidden while it is active<p>So I can only assume that it did not filter out these things.
    • cwillu45 minutes ago
      IIRC, it&#x27;s supposed to filter out disturbing or offensive content; any time you report a comment or a video, it suggests enabling it to prevent seeing that sort of thing in the future.
  • philipallstar45 minutes ago
    Texas judge rules heroin marketed as child safe so parents could get back to doing their own heroin was not child safe after all.
  • hirvi7430 minutes ago
    Why would anyone expect a data-funnel to the CCP to be honest? I am baffled that people even use the app.