19 comments

  • brookst9 minutes ago
    Tobacco exec says smoking falls by half with low-nicotine cigs.
  • embedding-shape14 minutes ago
    I think the single best change Instagram done in a decade is the "ad break" that happens once you've scrolled through enough posts, which stops you for N seconds to stare at some random ad. I think I can scroll through 2-3 posts before my scrolling gets locked, and I close the app, and now I barely scroll Instagram at all anymore. Thank you Instagram!
    • voidUpdate3 minutes ago
      When did that start for you? I've never seen that myself, I can keep scrolling as long as I want
  • dumberquestions10 minutes ago
    I don&#x27;t know what the right balance is, but there should be some sort of friction. Feeds shouldn&#x27;t be infinitely scrollable, for instance, and users could be made explicitly aware of how much time they&#x27;re spending.<p>Some people think this should all fall back on personal responsibility, but the way I see it, introducing highly addictive algorithms should&#x27;ve been regulated the same way adding addictive chemicals to food is.
  • petterroea30 minutes ago
    For a lot of people that&#x27;s a good thing
  • esperent4 minutes ago
    [delayed]
  • HNUsesLLMs1 minute ago
    Same with HN and its LLM powered comments script they run internally
  • coatmatter13 minutes ago
    Bluesky likely knows this problem well. The pro is that I never find myself stuck there. The con is that I just end up somewhere else (including this orange website). Time to ctrl-w.
    • esperent2 minutes ago
      [delayed]
    • Zigurd9 minutes ago
      Although Bluesky is tiny, they are the biggest and most stable proponent of letting users control their feed. Even if they don&#x27;t grow big, being half the size of a toxic social media platform is a damn good business model. Somebody can win with that, and I hope a diverse group of startups try.
  • sakisv16 minutes ago
    <i>cue the smallest sad violin</i><p>Snarky reaction aside, and actually reading the article, it says that the problem is something along the lines of &quot;we incentivized and rewarded business accounts to post large volumes, so now if you switch to chronological order you will see <i>more</i> of these posts which reduces user satisfaction&quot;.<p>Well, that just means that the company will have to adapt before their users start unfollowing spammy accounts and the whole &quot;influencer&quot; business takes a hit. Though tbh, not sure how much of a hit it could take but hey, when instagram says engagement falls, I allow myself to feel optimistic for a brief moment.
  • hgoel7 minutes ago
    I don&#x27;t get how instagram is as popular as it is. I made an account last week to try to look for pictures from an event I recently attended.<p>First I was incredibly surprised and frustrated that their search functionality is effectively nonexistent, then, when I gave up and scrolled, if I tapped on a post to look closer, I had to deal with it interrupting whatever I was listening to.<p>Then, cherry on top of the shit cake, they suspended my account unless I did some video ID process. Nope, not happening.<p>Instagram felt like a more invasive and hostile user experience than any social media I&#x27;ve used before.
    • hackingonempty3 minutes ago
      &gt; I don&#x27;t get how instagram is as popular as it is.<p>Stockholm syndrome.
    • hsuduebc23 minutes ago
      Everytime I stumble upon search on ANY meta made platform I&#x27;m dazzled by how anyone can make simple search such a shit feature. Messanger search is ridiculously not working for ten years now.
  • pluc15 minutes ago
    Monetization is down when content isn&#x27;t force-fed to users. Give this guy a raise.
  • mrkramer9 minutes ago
    Because people are lazy, they feed on feed.
  • dofm22 minutes ago
    Only half? That&#x27;s sort of depressing.
    • Zigurd5 minutes ago
      It can be good in the way that meals with green vegetables aren&#x27;t consumed as voraciously as cheeseburgers and fries. It depends on the quality of what&#x27;s in the feed.
    • blitzar13 minutes ago
      Will fry all the brains of humanity for double the engagement (and a promotion to L5).<p>Doesn&#x27;t sound worth it to me.
      • Tangurena27 minutes ago
        So this is the result of &quot;move fast and break things (humans in this case)&quot;.
    • jazzyb18 minutes ago
      It&#x27;s a good start.
  • croes4 minutes ago
    &gt; Users miss more content and spend less time on the platform.<p>And what is the effect of this on the user?<p>Oh right, you don&#x27;t care.<p>For me this guy is directly repsonsible of all the negative side effects of this attention grabbing engangement BS and he should go to jail for that.
  • danw197915 minutes ago
    Good stuff ! When’s it going to prod ?
  • civvv23 minutes ago
    Same probably goes for slot machines if you strip them of all the bright, flashy colours and comforting sounds and make it a black metal box, with only a number display.<p>Its almost like... it was inherently designed to be as addictive as possible?
    • Zigurd3 minutes ago
      I hope the point is bigger than a nit to pick, but a plain slot machine is still bad. Social media used to be good or at least interesting in a good way. Maybe it can be again.
  • hsuduebc21 hour ago
    &gt;Children will be smoking less if you don&#x27;t offer them cigarettes
  • chinathrow12 minutes ago
    Cry me a river, seriously.
  • simonwsimonw24 minutes ago
    [dead]