16 comments

  • swiftcoder10 minutes ago
    $37,000 in GPUs. Man, I never expected another PC manufacturer to make Apple's top configuration look cheap by comparison.
  • lxe5 hours ago
    I thought it was a pricing mistake. But no, you just have to select the variations. $42,412.00
    • adastra223 hours ago
      They missed an opportunity by not adding $8
    • mcbuilder4 hours ago
      I had to do a double take myself, scrolled down and arrived at a similar number.<p>Wish I built this a few years ago!
      • slowmovintarget3 hours ago
        Yeah, I bought a Thelio Major three years ago. I&#x27;m kicking myself for not going dual-4090s for a mere $10K back then.
      • felixfurtak4 hours ago
        Me three
    • slowmovintarget3 hours ago
      So a new car, or an AI rig.<p>That&#x27;s a bitter pill to swallow. Most of this is the cost of the Nvidia card, and the RAM.
      • numpad030 minutes ago
        <p><pre><code> Graphics: (...) +$18,399 192 GB Dual NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 w&#x2F; 1000W + 750W PSUs (non-refundable) +$37,239 Memory: (...) 192 GB DDR5 3600 MHz (4x48) +$1,874 </code></pre> yup, 87.8% of $42,412 is just two GPUs and a PSU. Even RAM is less than 5%.
      • sourweasel2 hours ago
        I&#x27;ve noticed that some companies have flat out dropped the high memory configurations from their lineup that were offered just months ago at inflated prices. OnePlayerX had a 128GB Strix Halo tablet, RedMagic had a 24GB Android phone - both have been removed from their sites. It&#x27;s a similar situation for the new Thinkpad lineup.
        • alightsoul1 hour ago
          The honor 400 used to be sold for 300 dollars with 12 gb of ram. Now the replacement the honor 600 comes with 8 GB at twice the price.
      • cute_boi3 hours ago
        SSD too. The priced have tripled...<p>It would be great if China had more lithography machine....
        • t-31 hour ago
          All memory. SSDs are expensive, microSD is expensive, even spinning rust has inflated.
        • jaggederest3 hours ago
          hoist by our own strategic export controls, rip
        • vsgherzi1 hour ago
          Taiwan would disagree
  • layer839 minutes ago
    &gt; Accelerate your AI development with Thelio Mira AI, System76&#x27;s affordable, GPU-focused workstations<p>From $3,299 (with just 64 GB RAM and a 4 GB GPU) to over $50,000. Very affordable indeed.
  • embedding-shape5 hours ago
    Seems they might be selling a combo of dual RTX Pro 6000 workstation cards (non-refundable), but the setup they have, unless they change how the GPUs cooling work, isn&#x27;t gonna work out thermally if you stack two of those workstation cards on top of each other. But it doesn&#x27;t say WS or &quot;Workstation&quot;, so I suppose could be the server variant too? But also doesn&#x27;t say...<p>Hope they have good overall cooling the case, cooling doesn&#x27;t seem to be mentioned, it&#x27;ll be a noisy little machine no doubt :)
    • wmf4 hours ago
      They&#x27;re [Max-Q] blower cards and there&#x27;s a big gap between them so the cooling looks fine.
      • embedding-shape4 hours ago
        So the two variants they offer is the Max-Q and the Server edition one, but only explicitly mentioned for one?<p>Edit: The Max-Q is one of the options, what&#x27;s the other option then?
        • nightski2 hours ago
          Seeing as it adds a second PSU, I&#x27;m guessing the workstation one.
    • rkagerer5 hours ago
      Page mentions liquid cooling, for what it&#x27;s worth.
  • bitbasher6 hours ago
    It only costs $40,000.
    • mandeepj5 hours ago
      the landing page showed &quot;$3,299.00&quot; and I had my <i>candy store</i> moment for a few secs.
    • jgalt2124 hours ago
      5 years ago I could not afford top shelf coders. Now I cannot afford top shelf machines.
  • nullbio4 hours ago
    New car or a Thelio. Tough decision.
    • catchnear43214 hours ago
      I bought a spark instead of a motorcycle so it’s somewhat relative and it’s also somewhat relative.
      • whartung1 hour ago
        There was a time when I sold my computer and bought a motorcycle.<p>Can honestly say that was one of the best trades I’ve ever done. I didn’t buy another computer for 3 more years.
  • rubyn00bie2 hours ago
    Anyone know why they chose a consumer grade CPU on this? I’m a little surprised to see a 9950X as the top option. There’s not enough PCIe lanes available to run everything without bifurcation. I imagine the GPUs probably aren’t too bothered generally… but the NVMe drives are likely to slow down as a result.<p>A Threadripper ain’t cheap, but if you’re spending $45k on a workstation it seems like a weird place to skimp. Not to mention you’d then have the option of shoveling a few more 6000 pros in it when you want to run something larger (assuming your home&#x2F;office electrical box can support it).
    • dannyw48 minutes ago
      You need far more absurdly expensive RAM (RDIMM&#x2F;ECC?) for a threadripper. Like 4x more expensive.
      • rubyn00bie21 minutes ago
        Aye but at $45k you’re so deep already is that really worth the savings? It’s so much easier to manage a single system, and the performance will be in absolute terms better.<p>Truly, I get your point, but $45k is obscene for a workstation (because of the RAM shortage). I can’t fathom it being a reasonable decision[1] unless you’re able to churn an immense profit from it. And… if you can, it’s an expense that saves time, energy, and effort. If it is only profitable when $8k in price difference makes it viable, is that really worth the effort? An $8k increase making a difference, when you’re wholly dependent on the frontier (or near frontier) lab not releasing a model that makes your work(station) irrelevant— seems reckless. Couple that with the doubling of DeepSeek’s parameters for their flash model… and well the math just don’t math for my naive brain.<p>[1] I’m absolutely incapable of spending that much on a workstation so my opinions may be irrelevant… but I cannot understand the “stepping over quarters to save a penny” mentality[2].<p>[2] I could be missing the forest for the trees. As a result, I’d love to know how I am being shortsighted. I just can’t fathom a situation where an $8k surcharge in system RAM doesn’t make sense. It’s not about system RAM, it’s about GPU RAM, margins, and useful lifetime of the system.
  • rkagerer5 hours ago
    What motherboard do they use? (Or do they design their own now?)
    • xeeeeeeeeeeenu5 hours ago
      The ASUS logo is visible in the photo of the innards.
    • embedding-shape5 hours ago
      I&#x27;m guessing it&#x27;ll depend on the GPU (and CPU) choice, putting the cheapest that is sufficient for the choice.
  • cherioo4 hours ago
    This makes Mac Studio with 256GB memory look cheap in comparison. More memory to store weight at a quarter of the price!
    • colordrops4 hours ago
      It&#x27;s gonna have WAY faster token rates than that Mac Studio though, enough to be a qualitative rather than quantitative difference.
      • GeekyBear2 hours ago
        At that price, it&#x27;s competing against a cluster of M5 Mac Studios, which we don&#x27;t have test data for yet.
      • b1124 hours ago
        Can&#x27;t it be both?<p>EG As I gazed at Janice, joy with equal part contentment washed through my soul.
  • rrgok31 minutes ago
    Is this just a marketing stunt? From a completely ignorant user, doesn&#x27;t AI reeuqires high bandwidth ram (like the GPU)? Is really DDR5’s bandwidth enough?
    • zepearl29 minutes ago
      <i>&gt; 192 GB GPU memory</i>
  • thom4 hours ago
    I remember losing sleep when I bought my RTX Pro 6000, but somehow they keep going up in price, and waddya know I’ve even done real work that appreciates the VRAM size.
  • arjie5 hours ago
    Haha, bloody hell, mate. $17k a pop? I bought these for $8k-ish. That&#x27;s bonkers to buy this when newer flash models won&#x27;t fit on this any more. DeepSeek V4 Flash seems the last in its line, and then you have to count on Qwen Next. Seems like a waste honestly.
  • protocolture1 hour ago
    Do I want one? Yes.<p>Can I afford it? Absolutely not.
  • chaostheory1 hour ago
    How is this interesting compared to either a Mac Studio or Nvidia Spark? Did I miss something?
    • wmf1 hour ago
      This is a tier above the best Mac Studio and two tiers above the Spark.
  • LoganDark4 hours ago
    Is it more powerful than Apple silicon, or why would anyone buy this? Just for Linux?<p>Oh, it&#x27;s System76, that&#x27;s why. Open hardware. Makes sense.<p>Edit: Also Nvidia
    • numpad014 minutes ago
      Mac GPUs supposedly being fastest thing on Earth obsoleting everything NVIDIA is just pure marketing. It was just faster once than some midrange laptop NVIDIA, which conveniently wasn&#x27;t explicitly marked as different chip sharing the branding with the desktop variant(oof).<p>The real benefits to going Mac is its quiet and discreet, high wife&#x2F;CEO acceptance design, and their huge GPU-assignable shared RAM.<p>If you&#x27;re okay with your desk being the wing top of a flying airplane, and 3M Peltor or David-Clark is your favorite working time headphone brand anyway, then your build will be faster and cheaper than a maxed out Mac Studio.
    • kelvie1 hour ago
      The prefill rates are <i>way</i> faster on these cards compare to apple silicon, which affects TTFT and usability for a lot of coding tasks a lot, unless you fire and forget most of the time for your use cases.
    • wmf4 hours ago
      It is more powerful than Apple.
      • LoganDark4 hours ago
        I wonder why Apple has not really pushed their memory bandwidth numbers. They&#x27;re starting to catch up to 2020 at this point -- cool, but still struggling to run years-old models. (FLOPS is even further behind by a year or two)<p>Maybe they&#x27;re waiting on HBM? Given that they&#x27;re skipping M6 Max to go straight for M7, I&#x27;d assume they&#x27;re doing a redesign for it.
        • wmf3 hours ago
          GDDR has higher latency and much lower capacity. HBM requires an interposer and also has lower capacity. It&#x27;s not an easy choice. The M7 family will probably double memory bandwidth using LPDDR6.
          • LoganDark2 hours ago
            So the MacBooks might get roughly the M5 Ultra&#x27;s bandwidth in a couple years. Not bad -- my M4 Max is currently stuck in 2016
  • senectus15 hours ago
    wouldnt you be better off maxing out the new Mac hardware? the memory bandwidth is insane on those jobbies
    • wmf5 hours ago
      Two RTX 6000 have more FLOPS and more memory bandwidth than a M5 Ultra (but they also cost more).
    • rubyn00bie2 hours ago
      There’s roughly 50% more memory bandwidth on an RTX 6000 pro versus the M5 Ultra. I imagine it really comes down to what you’re doing, I know my 5090 runs laps around the M5 Pro I have when it comes to local LLM performance (until it runs out of memory).<p>If it wasn’t for the fact the 6000 Pro is selling for like 100% ($9,000) over MSRP it would probably look a lot more reasonable.
    • bigyabai4 hours ago
      If your goal is pure GPU compute, you should have got a 5090. It can bench comparable to the RTX 6000 Pro cards and is near guaranteed to outperform M5 Ultra.