5 comments

  • chairhairair16 minutes ago
    Perfect for when you want your data to be stolen programmatically.
  • 54245817 minutes ago
    What I want (which I don’t think exists?) is a way to trigger turns that the user can monitor in the codex application. I.e., when event X happens, my application triggers Codex to take a turn with input Y, which the user can monitor through codex. Right now the only way to get close to this is with polling or essentially rewriting a codex-like frontend.
    • iforgotmypasswo3 minutes ago
      I just wrote my own VR harness in a weekend with Astra. It mentioned an SDK for exactly this in passing, but it was an experimental personal project so I didn’t bother to review the code.<p>I was doing exactly what you’re describing. I think this is a ToS violation for anything other than personal use though.
    • fy2012 minutes ago
      Basically how Cursor Cloud Agents work?
  • spwa49 minutes ago
    Since a week or so everything I ask codex to do, no matter how small, uses at least 1% of my weekly limits and like 5% of my 5h limit. It&#x27;s getting so bad I&#x27;m thinking of just canceling my OpenAI subscription, because this has no use anymore.
  • maxdo21 minutes ago
    Why would you choose api vs sdk . Sdk in a sandbox feels much better .
    • gavinray16 minutes ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.openai.com&#x2F;api&#x2F;docs&#x2F;guides&#x2F;agents#compare-agent-runtime-options" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.openai.com&#x2F;api&#x2F;docs&#x2F;guides&#x2F;agents#compare...</a>
      • maxdo13 minutes ago
        I get it why do I want to use your managed session , what do you win ? Any examples ?<p>I’m trying to understand the use case but it seems weird middle ground in a way .
    • pixl9715 minutes ago
      Because how does OpenAI earn more money then? At least to me it seems to try more vendor lock in, but I might mistaken on how easy it would be to just be another level of abstraction in an agent system.
  • simonw14 minutes ago
    I jumped straight to the section on configuring your sandbox&#x27;s network access: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.openai.com&#x2F;api&#x2F;docs&#x2F;guides&#x2F;agents-api&#x2F;environments&#x2F;openai-hosted#control-network-access" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.openai.com&#x2F;api&#x2F;docs&#x2F;guides&#x2F;agents-api&#x2F;env...</a><p>It offers three settings:<p><pre><code> enabled: Allow outbound access. This is the default unless you inherit a template policy. disabled: Block outbound access. restricted: Allow only the hosts listed in allowed_domains. </code></pre> Given what happened with the wiki thing the other week, where the agents rewrote their own &#x2F;etc&#x2F;hosts file to let them bypass sandbox rules, how trustworthy is that restricted option?