I skimmed the lawsuit. As far as I can tell, the complaint is about getting 4 x 15 minute extra breaks during the day and lighter work. Amazon did grant them, but the complaint is that they didn't do it fast enough. There's also something of a disagreement where she expected to be paid for the extra hour of break time every day, but Amazon was counting it as unpaid. She was reassigned to lighter work at her request, but the complaint is that she still had to lift heavy things and they didn't give her a job where she could sit down.<p>The word "bathroom" shows up a lot but that doesn't appear core to the lawsuit. I think an editor was engineering the headline for maximum clickbait to link back to the previous Amazon bathroom break stories.<p>Regardless of what you think about Amazon, this reporting could use a little less clickbait and little more details from the actual lawsuit.
Adults need permission to use a restroom?!
It didn't take long for people to appear in here to say it's not too bad.
> Amazon discriminated against pregnant warehouse employees by denying accommodations like bathroom breaks and the option to sit while working [...]
>
> “All four became pregnant. All four asked Amazon for basic pregnancy-related accommodations so they could keep doing their jobs. Amazon denied them basic modifications the law recognizes pregnant workers regularly need, even in uncomplicated pregnancies: Bathroom breaks. An extra 15-minute break. Sitting instead of standing.”<p>This is the opposite of discrimination: Amazon treated them the same as every other worker. In other words, they are suing because Amazon gave them equal treatment instead of being discriminating (towards other non-pregnant employees).
At this point is anyone surprised at what Amazon will do to the plebeian workers that fuel them?
Lets wait and see why the pilot who overshot the runway didn't do a go-around instead of attempting to land, pressuring airplane pilots would certainly take them to another level in my eyes.
At this point, do people prefer to accept a claim in a lawsuit as the truth if it happens to conform to their model of reality?
This is the company that literally hired the Pinkertons and has been repeatedly fined millions for labor related violations, up to and including union busting. Consider me not even an iota of surprised.
> Consider me not even an iota of surprised.<p>Yeah, I followed this link <i>specifically</i> to see how many folks are surprised that Amazon may have did yet <i>another</i> vile thing to their employees, and I'm <i>not one bit</i> surprised to find <i>nobody</i> surprised by it. LOL!
Meanwhile St. Bezos loudly complains that people are unfairly presenting billionaires as villains :)
It amuses me when adults need permission to perform basic human needs because a small group will always take advantage of common courtesy and ruin it for everyone else.<p>When I was in grade school I pissed my pants in the library because the librarian wouldn't let me go to the bathroom. We both learned a lesson that day. I learned to seek forgiveness over permission, and she learned that sometimes kids aren't bullshitting when they say they need to use the bathroom.<p>We are all at the mercy of the bottom quintile.
In any poor Eastern European country they would go for months-long paid leave long before the birth and then for months-long paid maternity leave.<p>If they decided to work during pregnancy they would get preferential treatment.<p>How are Americans not revolting against this bullshit is beyond me. The problem isn't even Amazon - it's the system that makes Amazon doing this shit even a possibility.
The idea that non-pregnant people shouldn't also get to use the toilet seems baffling to me.<p>Maybe just let people use it when they need it.
No where is it written here they shouldn't<p>Not everything needs to be a panacea to cover all edge cases<p>Legally a specific situation is often required<p>Imo it is a phony obligation to fragment people via feigned ignorance and willful ignorance, create liquidity of a sort in the litigation market making everyone fight the same fires over and over but that is currently how it works
Sounds right. On the flip side there are jobs where random bathroom breaks don't really work.<p>EG: bus driver.<p>So I am actually not sure how that works for a pregnat bus driver. Letting her randomly stop the bus at rush hour to pee doesn't seem fair to the commuters. Probably in practice pregnant bus drivers get assigned to a short route or something like that.<p>I don't know the nature of Amazon warehouse work. It's possible that unscheduled bathroom breaks affect multiple people (eg, I am peeing and you are idle because you depend on me to do your task) - that's the only condition where this feels at all conscionable.
If you really wanted to optimize something involving living consciousness beings like a machine, at least you should consider things like the need to take a piss as a hard constraint and design the system around it.<p>Don't get me wrong I love factorio like the next guy and understand the idea behind your thinking, but there should be limits to that thinking in the real world. And if that doesn't convince you consider the efficiency loss of a depressed worker with a urinary tract infection.<p>Honestly - and I don't mean that as an insult - I hope for you to experience (just once) the loss of dignity that not being able to visit the restroom on your own decision will give you. Might make you realize the hell this kind of thinking leads to.
You've never been on a bus where the driver had to stop to go use the restroom? There is no prohibition against that.
Many bus routes are designed with stopping/break points, including limiting route lengths so that operators aren't stuck in these conditions.<p>Yes, at 5pm in a major city, a bus driver might pull up next to a convenience stop, stop the bus, go pee, and come back. Does it happen often? Not that often, because of the aforementioned "we design routes so people aren't trapped for multiple hours" concept.
Both jobs already need to be designed around some expectation for how often people need to use the restroom. If individual exceptions are not feasible, they design the job so that it works for everyone.
What the fuck?<p>Edit: Sorry, you're suggesting that it's OK to disallow a bathroom break that would inconvenience customers or cause a fellow employee to be unable to progress? That category of work culture should be <i>unheard of</i> in the USA, but it's leaking in, and if we don't viciously reject it, we might as well start the country over.<p>If bathroom breaks are frequently causing some kind of unacceptable complication, then the problem isn't the bathroom break, it's the design of the position.
Turns out depending on the metro they already solved that problem.<p>Just let them piss.<p>They actually do let bus operators randomly stop the bus at rush hour to pee in some cities. In Ottawa (Ontario), for instance, as long as an operator is within their 5 minute "late standard" window, they can stop and make a quick pee break or Timmy's break as long as they keep the bus in time.<p>The busses lock down with a PIN when they get out of the seat (generated that morning at the depot) so you can't take it out of neutral anyways to try to steal it.<p><a href="https://www.michaelsuddard.com/2013/03/oc-transpo-condoned-timmies-run.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.michaelsuddard.com/2013/03/oc-transpo-condoned-t...</a><p><i>(Best part is this old blogpost with someone cranky over the stop as well getting shown receipts by OC Transpo that their Tim's wielding bus driver that morning was in fact running on time based on GPS data.)</i>
> The busses lock down with a PIN when they get out of the seat (generated that morning at the depot)...<p>How do drivers remember their daily PIN?
When they show up to the depot and get their bus assignment they get a slip with the PIN (IIRC), otherwise they can call dispatch back up, identify themselves, and be given a reset remotely. (<a href="https://www.cleverdevices.com/products/secure-bus-access/" rel="nofollow">https://www.cleverdevices.com/products/secure-bus-access/</a>)
> The busses lock down with a PIN when they get out of the seat (generated that morning at the depot) so you can't take it out of neutral anyways to try to steal it.<p>Huh, it would never have occurred to me to raise the objection "but someone could steal the bus while the driver is in the bathroom!" Why does the bus need to stay in neutral with a special system of daily rotating PINs, rather than having the driver take their key to the bathroom with them?
Transit buses generally actually don't use keys, amusingly. You pop the drivers' window open and reach in for the manual door release, then climb on board.<p>The headlight switch is also the 'master on' switch for the bus, then you slap an engine starter button and off to the races you go. It's <i>assumed</i> you keep the bus stabled somewhere secure.<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GtuUBEeTVg" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GtuUBEeTVg</a><p><a href="https://www.cleverdevices.com/products/secure-bus-access/" rel="nofollow">https://www.cleverdevices.com/products/secure-bus-access/</a><p>Clever Devices is one of the large players of the bus telematics industry and they just sit on the CANbus of the bus (heh!) and block the gear shift from being able to shift over it until you enter the PIN.<p>If you've ever played with a bus simulator, OMSI 2's <i>Chicago Downtown</i> addon requires you sign onto the bus to take it out of gear, too - you just look up and see the post-it note with that driver's ID and PIN ;)