4 comments

  • gruez26 minutes ago
    Youtube page, which has auto-generated transcripts: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=lLEkUGuw374" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=lLEkUGuw374</a><p>tl;dw:<p>1. it&#x27;s expensive<p>2. requires online connection and account to unlock bootloader<p>3. lenovo (the parent company) had shady behavior in the past
    • LikelySupernova17 minutes ago
      Then buy Pixel A series, it has none of those cons. And I&#x27;d say at that price point, Tensor isn&#x27;t even a bad processor.
    • bushwart17 minutes ago
      Needing an account to unlock the bootloader is a real bummer. I can live with issues 1 and 3. Thanks for the notes.
  • Hobadee12 minutes ago
    Last time a custom Android distro (CyanogenMod) made a deal with a manufacturer, everything went belly-up. I have little faith that the same won&#x27;t happen again. :-(
  • BearOso23 minutes ago
    Summary:<p>- The Motorola flagship costs too much and he&#x27;s worried it will no longer run on the Pixel 7a that he got for $200 or that there will be any cheap options.<p>But they said already there would be cheap options, and Motorola has a Moto G series that it would likely use.<p>- Worried about other stuff that existing Motorola Android phones do, like privacy violations.<p>...that definitely won&#x27;t be in GrapheneOS, they wouldn&#x27;t allow it.<p>- More things Motorola does as a company that are bad.<p>The current option being Google means, despite that, Motorola is probably better.
  • aniviacat16 minutes ago
    tl;dr:<p>- GrapheneOS is only supported on Motorola&#x27;s flagship devices, which the author deems too expensive<p>- Motorola historically has made unlocking the bootloader difficult, and GrapheneOS has not yet confirmed that this will become easier.<p>- The author does not trust Motorola.