6 comments

  • unwise-exe2 minutes ago
    Imagine how much more sense things would make if &quot;Race [dropdown]&quot; and &quot;Hispanic? [Y&#x2F;N]&quot; weren&#x27;t separate fields. Or if the available options made sense, or even allowed multiselect instead of having to pick only one. Or allowed for &quot;all my ancestors that I know names of lived in the states, so stop trying to associate me with other places&quot;.<p>.<p>And, um, I can kind of understand thinking it&#x27;s wrong to <i>deliberately falsify</i> results even in a controlled manner.
  • cowboylowrez41 minutes ago
    the US statistical system is currently down, I&#x27;m estimating that we won&#x27;t get an accurate picture of what systems have been wiped out until we can get some forensic analysts in there in 2029 or so once we solve a little HR issue we have in the executive branch.
    • Isamu4 minutes ago
      Would be nice to be in a stable country.
  • usernomdeguerre1 hour ago
    &gt;&quot;We need to check more carefully who is credited and who is accountable for statistical agency releases. We need to watch carefully, when the 2025 American Community Survey eventually comes out, whether the ban on noise infusion leads to less data being published and which tables are suppressed. We also need to question seemingly technical methodological changes and scrutinize them for political motivation more closely.&quot;<p>I didn&#x27;t realize they were delaying the 2025 ACS again and it seems things are just going to get worse if things don&#x27;t fit the narrative of the administration.
  • bamboozled29 minutes ago
    Absolutely insane how the USA is speed running into Russia.<p>I was discussing BBQ with some friends the other day and living in Asia there are certain cuts that you basically have to get imported if you want to do it right. Basically every single person in that group, including Americans have decided they wouldn&#x27;t trust or buy meat produce from the USA anymore as they don&#x27;t trust it anymore...
  • davesque10 minutes ago
    Corruption in the US Census Bureau? No fuckin&#x27; way!
  • rayiner1 hour ago
    [flagged]
    • samstokes1 hour ago
      Is that &quot;difficult&quot; quote from a separate source? I can&#x27;t find it in the text of the linked report.<p>Also, the report says that both red and blue states had both overcounts and undercounts, which is a different picture than &quot;over counts in blue states&quot;. It is accurate that more blue states had overcounts and more red states had undercounts.<p>I realise your question is rhetorical, but the report does offer a possible answer: &quot;The 2020 Census faced many challenges such as conducting fieldwork during the COVID-19 pandemic. Other challenges to the 2020 Census included con- troversy around a proposed citizenship question and changes in the duration of the Nonresponse Followup operation.&quot; It&#x27;s plausible that those &quot;challenges&quot; could have been experienced unevenly by state, particularly with how politicised the pandemic and its mitigations were in the US.
      • rayiner1 hour ago
        Yeah, good catch. Meant to link to two sources, the census bureau admission and an article describing it. I forgot to paste one of them: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thehill.com&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;campaign&#x2F;3504546-census-blunder-may-tip-2024-to-democrats&#x2F;amp&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thehill.com&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;campaign&#x2F;3504546-census-blunder-...</a>
        • CalChris43 minutes ago
          Opinion.
          • rayiner32 minutes ago
            So what? The article describes the political implications of the Census Bureau errors. I cited the Census Bureau release itself so you can cross-check whether the factual assertions in the article are accurate.
    • estearum51 minutes ago
      &gt; We estimated undercounts of people living in census tracts that had the lowest self-response rates. Specifically, we estimated a statistically significant net undercount among people living in the 20 percent of tracts with the lowest self-response rates.<p>News hot off the press: people bred from day one to be militantly antagonistic of the federal government end up undercounted when federal government comes to do counting.<p>Reminds me of the domestic terrorists who were threatening FEMA workers during Helene and then acting surprised when FEMA workers weren&#x27;t scrambling to walk up to Trump-flagged homes.
    • Frost1x1 hour ago
      &gt; How can you fuck up so monumentally, but then when Trump fires you somehow he’s the problem?<p>They can both be a problem, it doesn’t have to be mutually exclusive. I’m sure in all the turnover Trump removed some incompetent people. He also probably removed quite a few competent people. The ratio is what matters.
      • rayiner1 hour ago
        This isn’t a minor fuckup. It skewed House apportionment for a decade. Think of what would happen in the private sector: your team screws up something that blows up a major customer relationship. Do you think the firings are going to be surgical?
        • grim_io1 hour ago
          Yes? This is neither Cesar&#x27;s legion, nor The Apprentice.<p>Although, the guy at the top sure runs his place like a TV show, where all the stuntmen really do die for real.
        • aetch55 minutes ago
          Yes, the government shouldn’t be run on emotions or like a for profit company
        • ElProlactin1 hour ago
          &gt; Think of what would happen in the private sector: your team screws up something that blows up a major customer relationship. Do you think the firings are going to be surgical?<p>Except that you can look at all of the firings the current administration has been behind and the pattern does not suggest that they are intended to remove people who were incompetent.<p>To the contrary, the large number of reductions (and forced retirements) suggests that the administration is trying to remove political opponents and people who are &quot;disloyal&quot; to it, and to generally weaken institutions that the administration doesn&#x27;t like or feels threatened by.<p>This is especially visible in the military:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cbsnews.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;military-leaders-fired-forced-out-resigned-hegseth-defense-secretary-trump-pentagon&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cbsnews.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;military-leaders-fired-forced-o...</a>
    • tmpz221 hour ago
      The quote isn&#x27;t corroborated by the report.<p>Ohio and Utah were overcounted, Illinois was undercounted, and the remaining 37 states plus DC had no statistically significant error either way. Some of the significant results are also marginal: Delaware&#x27;s estimate of 5.45% has a standard error of 2.82, so the 90% confidence interval barely clears zero.
    • georgemcbay40 minutes ago
      Community Note:<p>Linked article is by kook right-wing Breitbart alum Kristin Tate, whitewashed through a relatively non-biased news source (thehill.com) by way of being an opinion piece (for which The Hill explicitly disavows agreement with any presented views).
    • lemmetellya1 hour ago
      [dead]
    • lisper1 hour ago
      [flagged]