Someone should make a browser extension to label HN posts with Pangram results of the top 100 posts, so I don't waste my time reading crap.<p>Always a pleasure reading Bryan's writing; it's like Bryan is sitting there with you and saying the words (hard to convey the feeling).
That is honestly the highest possible praise -- thank you. And when this piece was starting to boil inside of me last night (triggered, I'm sorry to report, by an obviously LLM-authored guest blog entry from the Rust Foundation[0]), I messaged one of my colleagues: "Time to do what I do best: bluntly say what lots of people are thinking."<p>Glad those words proved prophetic!<p>[0] <a href="https://rustfoundation.org/media/how-the-rust-standard-library-verification-contest-scaled-past-manual-proof-engineering/" rel="nofollow">https://rustfoundation.org/media/how-the-rust-standard-libra...</a>
AI slop really needs to be auto-flagged. It’s been like 20% of front page links I click on lately.
A lot of similar pieces have not considered a post is both the first and final work of a thing: opinions, and experience, and less of much in cited facts; with AI, that there even was a revision pass at all.<p>I guess there is a kind of participatory element to the discourse where, if you want an audience, there is an editing process. Whereas in other cases, we wrote these as progress notes on an unknown journey, breadcrumbs or upturned stones to mark a path to the horizon.<p>Maybe it's the difference between writing as a mode of discovery, retreading the mental arc of a solution, and writing something honed to leave a mark.
if its not worth your time to write, its not worth my time to read<p>this goes 10x for all the slide decks and google docs and wikislop everyone's trying to pass off as an accomplishment lately
> <i>Indeed, Pangram has become important to so many of us that I was thrilled when Pangram Labs co-founder and CEO Max Spero joined us recently on</i> Oxide and Friends.<p>Is obvious AI-assisted writing better or worse than an obvious PR quid pro quo and/or cross-promotion?
This is (obviously?) false, but considering how well-capitalized we are at the moment, you do have me wondering what a <i>quid pro quo</i> would be for; perhaps in this fictional universe Pangram has lucked into some of the PCIe clock buffers that we've been scrambling to secure enough of?