4 comments

  • radicalriddler5 minutes ago
    Spaces really is gonna bring all the features that HN is critical about AT platforms like Tangled.<p>Private repos are now on the horizon. Huzzah!
  • alfanick1 hour ago
    Oh, it&#x27;s some different AT protocol (some distributed mambojambo) than Hayes AT protocol.
    • thesuitonym37 minutes ago
      Yeah I was super confused for a minute, wondering what cool and fun use someone found for this old protocol.
  • ternaryoperator1 hour ago
    You’ll get more traction, by stating way up top what AT is and who should care about it.
    • CharlesW36 minutes ago
      Do you know of something better than the first link in TFA?
      • sltkr1 minute ago
        You shouldn&#x27;t have to click away from a blog post to understand what the blog post is about. It should start with a clear self-contained introduction.<p>atproto.com contains a succinct discription:<p>&gt; Atproto is a big-world open social protocol. Users publish JSON records into repositories. The changestreams of those records then sync across the network to drive applications.<p>Still a bit abstract, but OK. Personally I would include that AT protocol stands for Authenticated Transfer Protocol and that it is the protocol powering Bluesky.
    • SV_BubbleTime1 hour ago
      [flagged]
  • wslh1 hour ago
    Funny how this rhymes with something I wrote in 2011[1][2]: a &quot;universal spreadsheet&quot; where people share not just data but the transformations over it. The pieces are more real now: you can actually free your data from closed services (e.g. Instagram), orchestrate it on something like ATProto, and LLMs make a great new kind of &quot;function&quot; for the system.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.databigbang.com&#x2F;ideas-egont-a-web-orchestration-language&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.databigbang.com&#x2F;ideas-egont-a-web-orchestration...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.databigbang.com&#x2F;egont-part-ii&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.databigbang.com&#x2F;egont-part-ii&#x2F;</a>
    • verdverm1 hour ago
      Most people right now do not want their social media data in world&#x2F;anonymous-read mode nor want Ai accessing it and doing things with it.
      • maxrev1713 minutes ago
        Too late for that
        • verdverm8 minutes ago
          There&#x27;s always the future. I stopped using ATProto after the revelations that they hid their VC raise from the community for almost a year (and some other things, straw eventually breaks a camel&#x27;s back) - and almost all social media, which is a (mild) trend aiui.<p>Setting aside contemporary political dynamics, there is also the possibility for robust data rights laws that can change the game.
      • wslh26 minutes ago
        Nothing about this requires world-readable data, privacy can be its own layer. FriendFeed[1] did this well back in the day: it aggregated your feeds and let you control who saw each one.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;FriendFeed" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;FriendFeed</a>
        • verdverm6 minutes ago
          I agree, that&#x27;s just not where ATProtocol is (currently only available in world&#x2F;anonymous-read mode). Personally, I find the permission proposal rather lacking (ACL vs the advancements &#x2F; learning since) and user requested features will require building auth enhancements at the app level, thereby creating a form of centralization.