They'll get their 15 minutes, but there's no _there_ there. They're owned by System1, a bottom-of-the-barrel advertising company where 1990s web brands go to die (Metacrawler? Startpage.com?? Dogpile?!?!). Their maps are OpenStreetMaps maps.<p>People think they have their back (because OSM is showing Lake Ontario), but it's just marketing.
as opposed to a top of the barrel advertising company like Google
Dogpile?!? There's a name I haven't heard in what feels like 20 years.<p>The concept of searching a bunch of search engines made sense to me.
>Startpage.com<p>I thought that was still the best way to get anonymous google index search results?
They forgot to scoop up mapbalst!<p>never mind looks like they got swallowed up by bing maps (that’s where Bing got line drive from, TIL!)
I've dumped Google Maps for OSM over three years ago and have not looked back. Did this as one of my de-Google steps by choosing a Fairphone.<p>Looking at a FuriLabs FLX1S to start the next phase by switching to a Linux phone.<p>I've become a sunk cost to Google by not spending anything on their products or services and always use Ad-Block solution in a private session if I must.
I enjoy how Bing Maps (and Bing in general) are so unloved that it's not even part of the debate. (Bing Maps hasn't changed - yet - but probably will eventually, since they caved on the Gulf of Mexico)
It still says Ontario because there's no one left at MapQuest that knows how to change it.
I think a lot of people are desperate for tech giants to stand up to the current US administration.
> In 2019, Verizon sold MapQuest to internet advertising company System1.<p>It's ad companies all the way down.
I feel like it wasn't defiance as much as "we need to come up with a story why we don't have any developers who know how to update this".
Finding MapQuest on the PlayStore was a quest all on its own. More specifically, it does not exist on my PlayStore, and I had to install it on my phone remotely through the browser PlayStore.<p>Review wise, it sits firmly at a single star, so it's possible that Google burried it, although I would not put it past them to rig things.
Are you sure you installed the right app, com.mapquest.android.ace? It's 3.2 stars on the Play Store.<p>It's a serviceable app, but unfortunately it doesn't do public transit directions so its utility for me is pretty dubious.
I tried it out for a trip yesterday. I wanted to love the app—it has a great retro feel, and an ad-free subscription option—but it gave me weird routes and the audio was extremely stuttery.
On the back of a cocktail napkin, I drew a map of you...
I get why people want Apple and Google to push back but ultimately there isn’t any logical approach for them to operate that isn’t “name things as the relevant governmental bodies name them”. Otherwise what source of truth is there?<p>The responsibility here is with a spineless government. An executive order is not a law and a congress that did its job would quickly contract these kind of mad king declarations.
What about researchers at universities? Maintain a list of experts and conduct a poll whenever an event like this happens or enough of the experts request.<p>Or require an act of Congress. Obviously, we can no longer rely on Executive Orders being careful, thought-out, or lasting changes. Does any mapping organization want to change names back and forth? Does any user want to see these changes?
The government has no right to name geographic features. The names are established by popular usage, not the feds. As such Google and Apple should not listen to the demands of a body which has no right to make them in the first place.
Once again, private equity ruined another fine company ... with incessant advertisements
Earlier: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49510969">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49510969</a>
Take that Cory Doctrow [0]<p>[0] - <a href="https://boingboing.net/2019/10/10/do-webrings-next.html" rel="nofollow">https://boingboing.net/2019/10/10/do-webrings-next.html</a>