3 comments

  • mh-32 minutes ago
    I don&#x27;t usually comment about LLM-written articles, but it feels like an especially bad idea to do so in an article where you promote a book you&#x27;re writing. Will that be LLM output, too?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pangram.com&#x2F;history&#x2F;9c8f8da8-0b4d-48d6-be23-9e8a2e88bff8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pangram.com&#x2F;history&#x2F;9c8f8da8-0b4d-48d6-be23-9e8a...</a>
    • woozlewuzzle25 minutes ago
      I wonder how it determines that part of the text was AI written
      • mh-22 minutes ago
        Not sure, but I intentionally included the opening paragraph because I spotted the writing style switch when I got to the second paragraph. So then ran it on Pangram to confirm.<p>edit: to be clear, if you click the details, the &quot;70%&quot; refers to the fact that it thinks the opening paragraph is human written (or edited), and the rest is 100% AI with &quot;high confidence&quot;.
  • jen729w15 minutes ago
    Which is why the only people authorised to declare an incident are your incident managers. They follow the published guidelines which dictate what&#x27;s a Sev 2 and what isn&#x27;t.<p>A manager of a service may not declare their own service a Sev 2. If they can, your incident management process is broken.
  • CBLT48 minutes ago
    I was stuck in the middle of one of these at a megacorp. It was a Code Mauve, which meant it was technically enough to pre-empt my existing project. I grabbed a meeting with my manager, and carefully asked if I should find a way to avoid being pulled off my project. My manager just said to shelve my current project and work on the Code Mauve, as the rules designate.<p>When my manager got heat for the shelved project, he threw me under the bus and got me onto a PIP for not being able to complete tasks.