Tmp.0ut Volume 5

(tmpout.sh)

163 points by ghuntley17 hours ago

21 comments

  • joshuaS982 hours ago
    ``` How can people write big systems in general?<p>We do, but as you say, they&#x27;re often debugged into existence rather than cleanly designed into existence. ```
  • sph8 hours ago
    Seeing stuff like this reminds me why I got into computers in the late 90s. Human ingenuity paired with love for the art and the craft.<p>Good to have a reminder that it’s software engineering that has changed, not me.
  • harel2 hours ago
    This reminds me that I have a stack of 2600 magazines in the garage somewhere. I need to revisit them...
  • glimshe9 hours ago
    A small window to how we used to spread deep computer topics in the 90s. No substacks or X posts. Very cool.
    • sph8 hours ago
      No boring themes either. There was more than the corporate bland aesthetic.
      • p-e-w7 hours ago
        They all converged to looking the same though.<p>An unreadable fantasy font logo at the top, multiple concentric frames, dot lines, l33t speech etc.<p>And I absolutely remember people complaining about slop in such intros even in the 90s, they just didn’t use that term.
  • NDlurker6 hours ago
    The mixtape is great. Not sure what genre this would be considered but it&#x27;s very interesting<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;soundcloud.com&#x2F;blotter1&#x2F;blotter_tmp0ut_2026" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;soundcloud.com&#x2F;blotter1&#x2F;blotter_tmp0ut_2026</a>
    • crtasm5 hours ago
      Direct link, no tracking: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;soundcloud.com&#x2F;blotter1&#x2F;blotter_tmp0ut_2026&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;soundcloud.com&#x2F;blotter1&#x2F;blotter_tmp0ut_2026&#x2F;</a>
      • NDlurker5 hours ago
        Thanks. I don&#x27;t use SoundCloud so didn&#x27;t recognize that as a tracking link. Will edit the post
    • nanoxide2 hours ago
      I&#x27;m sure someone has a more precise idea on what it&#x27;s called, but I would lean towards minimal DnB.
  • atannen22 hours ago
    Good interview with McIlroy. Fix this: Goldstine, as in the citations, not Goldstein, as in the body text.<p>Also, the text mentions CDC 1620. I don&#x27;t think this existed. Either it was IBM 1620 or CDC something else.<p>I&#x27;d be just as happy with clear readable type, but the content is the thing.
  • pixelpoet1 hour ago
    Is the zero instead of capital O in the title intentional?
    • jolmg1 hour ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tmpout.sh&#x2F;5&#x2F;1.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tmpout.sh&#x2F;5&#x2F;1.html</a><p>&gt; Welcome to tmp.0ut Volume 5!<p>They are kinda inconsistent about it, looking at the social media handles, ascii logos, etc.
  • guerrilla19 hours ago
    Wow, it&#x27;s been a while since anyone published anything this interesting.
    • jenders19 hours ago
      Agreed. Love stuff like this. Keep it comin’
  • Rendello4 days ago
    This one was good:<p><i>Interview: Doug McIlroy</i>: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tmpout.sh&#x2F;5&#x2F;2.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tmpout.sh&#x2F;5&#x2F;2.html</a>
    • kenanfyi7 hours ago
      That was an amazing read.
  • chews1 hour ago
    really missed an opportunity to make this available via SSH shell or renderable in lynx.
  • brettermeier7 hours ago
    Very nice aesthetics.
  • vivzkestrel4 days ago
    - i like visual<p>- can we get a whole magazine that explains ideas like this? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;visualrambling.space&#x2F;neural-network&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;visualrambling.space&#x2F;neural-network&#x2F;</a>
  • nekooooo22 hours ago
    wow, actual hackers
  • darkstar_169 hours ago
    I miss the ezines scene!
  • bargainbin4 days ago
    Love the aesthetic. There was another ezine like this years ago focused on cybersecurity, I’ve forgotten its name now but the ASCII art involved was top notch.<p>Does anyone have any idea? It was definitely when Twitter was still Twitter as I remember reaching out to them about their ASCII art.
    • mckirk4 days ago
      Maybe you&#x27;re thinking of Phrack [1]? I wonder if there&#x27;ll be another edition of it, and if yes what it would look like, now that the AIpocalypse seems to have reached security research...<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;phrack.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;phrack.org</a>
      • bibelo10 hours ago
        Darnet Diaries&#x27;episode about the legendary phrack<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;darknetdiaries.com&#x2F;episode&#x2F;170&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;darknetdiaries.com&#x2F;episode&#x2F;170&#x2F;</a>
      • guitmz4 days ago
        there will be a new Phrack this year still!
        • mckirk4 days ago
          Thank you, that is very reassuring to know :D<p>(and interactions like these are part of the reason why I &lt;3 HN)
      • bargainbin4 days ago
        Not Phrack but I did find it, ThugCrowd [1]!<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thugcrowd.com&#x2F;archive.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thugcrowd.com&#x2F;archive.html</a><p>Edit to add, apparently one of the ThugCrowd people is part of tmp.0ut so that would explain why my mind immediately went there.
  • josefritzishere3 hours ago
    This is gorgeous; supremely impressive.
  • debo_17 hours ago
    The interview with Doug McIlroy is incredible. It&#x27;s almost worth a link all on its own.
  • iberator21 hours ago
    Very cool and BBS&#x2F;hacking style. BUT almost useless on mobile :(<p>I prefer to use a PC but that kind of articles are perfect to read when commuting.<p>You could just use &lt;br&gt; instead of fixed length words per line.
    • russellbeattie7 hours ago
      Agreed. Though apparently you&#x27;re being downvoted for a legitimate issue. I&#x27;m laying down using my phone and it&#x27;s not particularly enjoyable to read.<p>It&#x27;s 2026 - the site can <i>look</i> like an old-skool zine being displayed with monospace fonts on a computer monitor and <i>easily</i> still have alternate formats for mobile devices. Not having it is just pure laziness.<p>I wouldn&#x27;t mind if Reader Mode could deal with the text, but it can&#x27;t. Oh well.
  • megagpt119 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • BodyCulture7 hours ago
    It would be great if you hacked your website to be better usable on a smaller mobile device! I need to zoom in to read, but then I also need to scroll sideways because of fixed layout.<p>You can do both, achieve a cool retro style and publish in a more modern format that supports multiple output devices.
    • hk__25 hours ago
      …Or use a non-modern format and serve it as .txt, which supports all devices. The only downside is you’ll lose colors, but they are not strictly required.