4 comments

  • nxobject5 hours ago
    As the article belatedly mentions, the ~40 GB automated tape library for HARVEST was the bee&#x27;s knees... and possibly the inspiration for &quot;harvest now, encrypt later&quot;.<p>PS – Primary sources for the IBM 7950&#x2F;HARVEST on Bitsavers, excellent as always:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bitsavers.org&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;ibm&#x2F;7950&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bitsavers.org&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;ibm&#x2F;7950&#x2F;</a>
    • MeteorMarc4 hours ago
      Decrypt later, I suppose.
      • nxobject2 hours ago
        Ouch, that was indeed a typo...
  • zkmon5 hours ago
    What happened to IBM?
    • BenoitP5 hours ago
      They had vertical integration and made bank. Then each layer got more complex as computing became mainstream, and IBM got out-competed on everyone of them by specialized companies. And then they sold them off. The only layer that remains is the most strategic: the customer relationship.<p>IBM is now just a consultancy.
      • INTPenis3 hours ago
        Not much is left of the great IBM, but their Z architecture is still superior when it comes to reliability at scale.<p>In fact, &quot;what happened to IBM?&quot;, they were in the news recently: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wccftech.com&#x2F;ibm-worlds-first-dual-architecture-processor-dual-isa-core-natively-executes-z-arm-software&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wccftech.com&#x2F;ibm-worlds-first-dual-architecture-proc...</a><p>Creating the world&#x27;s first dual instruction set CPU.
      • noir_lord4 hours ago
        I think that&#x27;s a little simplistic&#x2F;reductive.<p>In some areas IBM still holds if not a technological advantage at least the first among equals position, they just aren&#x27;t areas that are flashy or generally known outside of folks like us - Mainframes and related technologies for example, the IBM Z series is still a huge player there.<p>They are also a consultancy though.
      • chinathrow4 hours ago
        They still produce the mainframe hardware ranges though.
      • anonymous_sorry4 hours ago
        &gt; IBM is now just a consultancy.<p>Except that they own Red Hat
    • smolder5 hours ago
      They became NSC, no such company.
    • Nursie5 hours ago
      Sometime in the 90s they decided that becoming a services and consultancy provider was more important than being involved in large-scale commodity hardware or really anything else.<p>Over three decades they&#x27;ve exited commodity hardware (x-series and thinkpads), retreated from a lot of software stuff and generally gone as hard as they can for large-scale business contracts. They seem to keep a decent amount of cutting-edge hardware research going, Power is still broadly competitive with x86 AFAICT, but the volumes have got to be pretty low these days and I half suspect that some of it is just a &quot;Hey look at us we&#x27;re still here&quot; play rather than actually feeding into products, because services are the profit-centre.<p>They&#x27;re still huge and have a lot of money, and they own Redhat. But IMHO it&#x27;s in a long, slow decline, and it has stepped back from the public eye and most public-facing markets.<p>Context - I&#x27;ve worked for them in a few places. Obvs my opinons are my own, especially as I&#x27;ve been &#x27;out&#x27; for over a decade at this point.
  • ablation5 hours ago
    That one job was to process &quot;sensitive&quot; intelligence intercepts and break codes, if you&#x27;re not grabbed by the clickbait headline. It&#x27;s a good read.
  • Devin31621 hour ago
    [dead]