5 comments

  • Geee1 minute ago
    I feel like claude.md is like Asimov's laws of robotics. Whatever you write there ends up eventually messing up everything.
  • OptionOfT16 minutes ago
    A bunch of these should be enforce with linting, that way people who still hand-craft code get the same kind of feedback, e.g. Always use {}, even on a one-line &quot;if&quot; statement. &amp; Keep function names short. Less than 30 characters.<p>Then this one really is a pattern that creates a lot of churn:<p>- Add a small, to the point, comment to explain <i>what</i> the block does and <i>why</i>. Use examples when possible. Propose ASCII drawings to explain complete systems.<p>The what _is_ the code.
    • getnormality15 minutes ago
      I would <i>never</i> tell an agent to write &quot;what does the code do&quot; comments. Their default comments are already way too fluffy.
  • oumua_don174 minutes ago
    Just this one line in AGENTS.md has given better results to reduce if not eliminate verbosity and grandeur.<p>**Always use ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English<p>Disclaimer: I saw this listed in some other HN post that I can&#x27; locate right away.
    • wpasc1 minute ago
      idk who came up with it first, but ASD-STE100 has been floating around more since matt pocock put it in one of his skills
  • getnormality17 minutes ago
    This is a problem that people mostly have to solve themselves. Like, I&#x27;ve been working with Claude for almost a year now and I have never once seen it write &quot;Arrow Anti-Pattern&quot; code. That, and much of the rest, would be fluff in my projects. Agent instructions are best learned from experience project-by-project.
  • acedTrex13 minutes ago
    Agents.md is such a ridiculous concept, just write good contributing docs and then optionally @ the file in whatever agetn file you use.<p>That way everyone benefits.