1 comments

  • bell-cot1 hour ago
    Given the temperament of the current POTUS, using that word seems ill-advised.
    • florkbork46 minutes ago
      Who knows. Could just burn down the ballroom this time and would anyone be too mad?
      • ben_w41 minutes ago
        Wouldn't they need to build the ballroom first, before burning it down?
        • madaxe_again33 minutes ago
          No need - it’s already a toxic garbage fire.
          • ben_w25 minutes ago
            It&#x27;s a metaphorical toxic garbage fire, but unless I&#x27;ve missed some news the current state is somewhat different from the &quot;actually set fire to it&quot; historical events referenced earlier: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;File:The_President%27s_House_by_George_Munger%2C_1814-1815_-_Crop.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;File:The_President%27s_House_b...</a>
    • bamboozled46 minutes ago
      “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.” — Sun Tzu, The Art of War<p>Let’s be honest, everyone who tried appeasement is in a much worse position with the man child.
      • thaumasiotes41 minutes ago
        There does seem to be a strain of Trump respecting people for standing up to him.
        • inference-god17 minutes ago
          I guess that&#x27;s the thing with draft dodging, cowardly sex predators. If the going gets tough, they find an easier victim.<p>Look how well Iran has done standing up to him, he has literally been fucking owned by Iran and really done nothing of substance in response.<p>One of the worlds more infamous, low IQ, low T, sleep on the job, corrupt, DEI hires ever, the irony is wonderful ;)