8 comments

  • FL41053 minutes ago
    Seems like a whole lot of nothing for the average user. They have really lost the plot.
    • nonethewiser43 minutes ago
      I dont understand. Not everything has to be for everyone.
  • gorgmah34 minutes ago
    For those who had access, how does it compare IRL with GLM 5.3 ? iirc both models are similar in terms of benchmarks ?
    • conception19 minutes ago
      I’ve been working on a decompilation project that fable was choking on and GLM 5.3 has been chunking away at it for 72 hours now? I think it’s my favorite agentic/implementer model right now.
      • ChickeNES13 minutes ago
        Oh? Can you share any details on the decompilation project?
  • gz544 minutes ago
    may have been rushed by hugging face being unable to use claude to debug or fix their breach, because there isnt detail on new guardrails put into place to protect against anthropic&#x27;s initial concerns of wide distribution?<p>separately, it is interesting they are adding an oem type offer:<p>&gt;We’re working with our cybersecurity technology and services partners to integrate Claude Mythos 5 into the products and services defenders already use to secure their software.<p>anyone know the shape of those contracts, e.g. pure tokens&#x2F;usage or more of a traditional licensing or oem type structure?
    • wmf27 minutes ago
      Hugging Face was able to sign up for Glasswing but they just didn&#x27;t.
  • nomilk31 minutes ago
    &gt; Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders<p>This dance is quite annoying. If Anthropic release a paid model, the user should control what it does and doesn&#x27;t do. The other day I had a security incident that required urgent response. ChatGPT and Claude were utterly useless (I quickly attempted to get access to the former&#x27;s advanced security capabilities but was met with a form I could complete - far too slow for a time-sensitive problem like a security incident!). So I used grok and it helped! I am told Kimi also helps in such cases although haven&#x27;t tried it yet.
    • conception17 minutes ago
      Voting matters. Remember these companies are trying not to get shut down overnight.
    • trial321 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • vasco43 minutes ago
    This week I found two issues in my company codebase. After finding them I told a claude session about one and asked for a quick proof of concept demo of the exploit. It refused, including refusing simple things in the same session afterwards.<p>Meanwhile same model in a new tab, say I need help creating a page that hits an endpoint with a special payload and it does the same things that were too dangerous in the previous tab...
    • eterm13 minutes ago
      I had that when opus 4.8 was first out. It repeated refused to make a PoC for an issue it suspected.<p>I eventually gave up and just asked it to fix the issue. The first thing it did? Write a PoC to verify the issue was still valid...
    • BlackRabbit132 minutes ago
      Just use a EU or US hosted Asian Opensource model. They will spit out everything.
  • surgical_fire22 minutes ago
    In a world where things such as GLM-5.3, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, and Kimi-K3 exists, this is a bit laughable.<p>Anthropic needs some model with a fancy name so they can pretend for another while that their model is so powerful it will destroy the world if released. I propose Claude Legend 6.
    • iAMkenough1 minute ago
      I predict 2027 will be the year of Ultra<p>* Claude Ultra 0.8<p>* iPhone Ultra<p>* Paramount Ultra<p>* Disney Ultra+<p>* WiFi Ultra
  • echelon42 minutes ago
    China will beat them to general availability.<p>Anthropic is overconfident, and it&#x27;s going to bite them in the ass.<p>Dario deserves it for being so hypocritical, fear mongering, and ladder pulling. Fastest hero to villain arc in recent memory.