7 comments

  • mrbluecoat35 minutes ago
    &quot;[GrapheneOS] lost most interest in that hardware due to the poor way privacy, security, updates and marketing based on these things has been handled.&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discuss.grapheneos.org&#x2F;d&#x2F;28825-is-there-any-chance-or-interest-in-working-together-with-fairphone&#x2F;3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discuss.grapheneos.org&#x2F;d&#x2F;28825-is-there-any-chance-o...</a>
    • NoboruWataya11 minutes ago
      I&#x27;m sure their concerns are valid but just because GrapheneOS don&#x27;t consider the Fairphone to meet their standards for security doesn&#x27;t mean it is not worth considering for other people who may have different priorities. Fairphones have certain advantages over Pixels such as better repairability and more ethically sourced labour&#x2F;components. IMO it&#x27;s good to see the Fairphone do well (and I hope GrapheneOS&#x27;s partnership with Motorola also goes well).
    • dnautics3 minutes ago
      i dont get it, they are comparing eOS to graphene, not talking about the hardware.<p>this would be like grapheneOS not using pixel because the stock android that ships with it does not respect privacy.<p>am i missing something?
    • gruez22 minutes ago
      Here&#x27;s a post with more specific allegations:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discuss.grapheneos.org&#x2F;d&#x2F;24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discuss.grapheneos.org&#x2F;d&#x2F;24134-devices-lacking-stand...</a>
  • threemux21 minutes ago
    Looks great! For other T-Mobile users, it actually supports the full range of frequency bands. Quite a few devices claim T-Mobile support but are then missing band 12 or 71 on LTE or n71 on 5G, all of which are critical for coverage outside of cities.
  • commoner16 minutes ago
    Exciting to see this soon after someone got the Fairphone 6 camera working on postmarketOS:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49338285">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49338285</a><p>The 6+ is a different model, but the announcement says the camera module is the same.
  • Runways11 minutes ago
    USB 2.0 port is the only thing preventing me from purchasing one. A wild choice since I believe previous versions did not have this limitation.
    • fnord1234 minutes ago
      You need to transfer more than 480Mbps over a hard line to and from your phone? Seems like a niche requirement that even iPhone 17 doesn&#x27;t bother with. Or is it psychological &#x27;nunber must go up and usb number went from 2 to 3 many years ago so now 2 bad&#x27;
    • zyberzero8 minutes ago
      How often do you connect stuff to your phone, and for what purposes? I genuinely wonder!<p>I can&#x27;t remember the last time I connected my phone to my computer for other purposes than charging the phone, but that&#x27;s me and we all use our stuff different ways
  • amazingamazing9 minutes ago
    $650 for anyone who does not want to click. Hard sell compared to the iPhone 17e but more choice is good.
  • AdmiralAsshat39 minutes ago
    No Verizon support. :(
    • Alcor15 minutes ago
      How is that still a thing? I can’t think of a phone here in Europe that you can’t just put a SIM card from any carrier in and it will work.