5 comments

  • spider-mario7 minutes ago
    &gt; For instance, we’re quite proud that a XCF file made by a small company for their logo in 1998 still renders the same way in the latest version of GIMP<p>How do they pronounce “XCF” such that it’s “a XCF file” and not “an XCF file”? “Xeceff”?
    • Choco314153 minutes ago
      The beginning of “XCF” sounds similar to the beginning of “Exit”.<p>With “a” vs “an”, the pronunciation is more important than the spelling.
  • roschdal0 minutes ago
    Zipped XML sounds like a bad idea. It&#x27;s slow and bad. I say XCF forever.
  • dm3194 minutes ago
    Non-destructive filter layers caught my eye, and has been something I&#x27;ve missed since moving off Windows&#x2F;Photoshop to Linux. Looking around it seems like they introduced this in V3, which is great to see.
  • TiredOfLife16 minutes ago
    I thought every developer of this moved to the Glimpse fork
    • herbst11 minutes ago
      Pretty sure woke gimp was long discontinued
      • clarionbell7 minutes ago
        <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;itsfoss.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;glimpse-gimp-fork-archived&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;itsfoss.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;glimpse-gimp-fork-archived&#x2F;</a> Yep, it&#x27;s dead.
      • ben_w3 minutes ago
        I&#x27;m surprised it got that epithet, I&#x27;m used to &quot;upset by weird sex stuff&quot; as being a US-right position, and &quot;woke&quot; being a term that&#x27;s used by US-right to denigrate US-left.<p>Then again, I&#x27;m also old enough to have seen it shift significantly in meaning at least once, and I think I&#x27;m seeing it shift meaning again.
  • socalgal223 minutes ago
    Zipped XML. Welcome to 1999 designs
    • muhehe21 minutes ago
      What would you consider good modern design?
      • supriyo-biswas17 minutes ago
        SQLar[1], see [2] for some reasoning around why a database is preferred over zipped XML. Though, I&#x27;d be fine with a DBM-style database too as we only need the key-value part of it.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sqlite.org&#x2F;sqlar&#x2F;doc&#x2F;trunk&#x2F;README.md" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sqlite.org&#x2F;sqlar&#x2F;doc&#x2F;trunk&#x2F;README.md</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sqlite.org&#x2F;affcase1.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sqlite.org&#x2F;affcase1.html</a>
        • chungy8 minutes ago
          the SQLite archive format (it&#x27;s probably worth linking to the main documentation[1], instead of the very old experimental repository) may not really be a good fit for something like GIMP&#x27;s native file format. (To be clear, &quot;SQLite archives&quot; are not special compared to any other database: it&#x27;s just a well-defined schema for an sqlar table, which the sqlite3 command line tool is able to create, update, and extract using syntax like the tar command.)<p>That being said, SQLite would still be a good choice, especially as it&#x27;s a format that&#x27;s really intended to be modified in-place, and has good data integrity features (eg: keep WAL enabled so that mid-save crashes&#x2F;shutdowns don&#x27;t corrupt your file), neither of which are provided by Zip. You could even just run zlib on data (be it XML or what have you) if optimizing the on-disk size of the file is desirable.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sqlite.org&#x2F;cli.html#sqlite_archive_support" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sqlite.org&#x2F;cli.html#sqlite_archive_support</a>