9 comments

  • OgsyedIE33 minutes ago
    I&#x27;m convinced that the patterns of the federal judiciary freely supporting egregious misconduct by multiple agencies will last until roughly one week after the funeral of the current POTUS. Old age, complications, whatever, the pendulum will swing back.<p>The best case scenario for that swing-back is a prolonged and entirely civil witch hunt of the judges and attorneys involved, by force of intimidation by state governors threatening expulsion of federal personnel and nonpayment of funds to the Treasury unless a witch-hunting organisation is allowed to operate. This sounds horrible, but it is the option that most safely diffuses the tensions of implied violence. It&#x27;s mirror, an entirely uncivil (force of arms) witch hunt, has historical precedents in other countries that suffered catastrophic civil wars and is the worst-case option.<p>Like it or not, every country has the pendulum and it can only be managed.
    • einszwei9 minutes ago
      I don&#x27;t think we should assume that there is a universal law of gravity that will automatically swing this pendulum in other direction.
    • uoaei8 minutes ago
      If Trump dies, Vance becomes president. If Vance dies, Mike Johnson becomes president. What do you know about those people that I don&#x27;t that convinces you the hammer will come down once Trump is dead?
    • kraken_cult24 minutes ago
      Ah yes, the famously fair, famously well thought out &quot;witch hunt for thee, but not for me&quot;.<p>How about acknowledgement that there was a reason these people got elected and the addressing of grievances that brought that about. Problems heard and addressed.
      • 3eb7988a166319 minutes ago
        The grievance was that not enough journalists were getting thrown into jails without proper procedures or medical care?
      • OgsyedIE18 minutes ago
        Nobody has a magic wand to produce the best option and they instead have to make do with the least bad physically possible option.<p>The constituency for the immiseration of the masses is unfortunately bipartisan. It predates Trump (and Biden) and was embraced by Trump (and Biden) to the opposite of their rhetoric. However, the historical consensus on tolerating extralegal behaviour by the executive and judiciary anywhere else on Earth is that it has a 100% track record of making immiseration worse. No other improvements can first occur without removing that state of affairs which bottlenecks everything else, by the least harmful physically possible method.<p>You want a better option? Go find a genie.
      • solid_fuel19 minutes ago
        Cry all you want, the people are demanding justice for the egregious crimes of the trump administration and his pathetic, sycophantic supporters. I think they will have it, one way or another.
  • dfee10 minutes ago
    admittedly, i don&#x27;t know anything about this case, but the person at the center of it seems to be Carlitos Ricardo Parias.<p>the intercept (source link) was rated far left by AllSides (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.allsides.com&#x2F;news-source&#x2F;intercept-media-bias" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.allsides.com&#x2F;news-source&#x2F;intercept-media-bias</a>) and the press release from justice.gov has a very different perspective (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.justice.gov&#x2F;usao-cdca&#x2F;pr&#x2F;illegal-alien-mexico-charged-using-his-car-assault-federal-agents-attempting-arrest" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.justice.gov&#x2F;usao-cdca&#x2F;pr&#x2F;illegal-alien-mexico-ch...</a>).<p>it&#x27;s very unclear what can be taken at face value.
    • uoaei7 minutes ago
      The Intercept is not far-left, they are Blob-aligned via Pierre Omidyar.<p>Reading this meter you linked from AllSides, it appears that the main purpose of that meter is to enforce the boundaries of the Overton window using faux-objectivity as a cover.
      • dfee1 minute ago
        makes it doubly hard when you can&#x27;t trust a media bias website, either.<p>solving for &quot;trust&quot; is one of the hardest problems out there in 2026.
  • infinite_spin45 minutes ago
    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;N9hmS" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;N9hmS</a>
  • camillomiller37 minutes ago
    How do you guys in the US go about life as if this ain’t happening? Otherwise, what are you specifically doing against it? What even small acts of resistance are you ready to put in place? Genuinely curious, let’s hear it.
    • fedpost29 minutes ago
      Have you seen our prison system? Everyone who&#x27;s actually &quot;done something&quot; about it is either dead, spent time in supermax, or is headed to supermax.
      • camillomiller28 minutes ago
        Your country is lost.
        • fedpost23 minutes ago
          No shit. Many of us are doing stuff, but we can&#x27;t post about it on fucking social media if we don&#x27;t want to join our friends at the supermax party.
    • sandworm10123 minutes ago
      There are two realities at the moment: the everyday culture that really hasn&#x27;t changed all that much, and a federal dog-and-pony circus act that roams around the country doing crazy stuff. The vast majority of people have no interaction with the circus. For them, everything is normal and these news stories are an aberration. If they watch the news, they assume there is some larger story that they aren&#x27;t being told. So the circus continues like a bad sitcom, nobody caring enough to actually do anything about it because they aren&#x27;t really sure whether it is real.
      • vrganj14 minutes ago
        &quot;What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act&quot;<p>[...]<p>&quot;This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap, took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of government growing remoter and remoter.&quot;<p>[...]<p>&quot;The dictatorship, and the whole process of its coming into being, was above all <i>diverting.</i> It provided an excuse not to think for people who did not want to think anyway. I do not speak of your ‘little men,’ your baker and so on; I speak of my colleagues and myself, learned men, mind you. Most of us did not want to think about fundamental things and never had.&quot;<p><i>They Thought They Were Free - The Germans, 1933-45</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;press.uchicago.edu&#x2F;Misc&#x2F;Chicago&#x2F;511928.htm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;press.uchicago.edu&#x2F;Misc&#x2F;Chicago&#x2F;511928.htm</a>
    • RickJWagner31 minutes ago
      [flagged]
      • devindotcom11 minutes ago
        accounts from ICE are not trustworthy or factual.
      • camillomiller29 minutes ago
        Without a trial? With a terrible firearm wound? Not even a murderer deserves such treatment in a civil country. You people are far gone. Fucking nazi Germany 1935
  • ck236 minutes ago
    btw another crime by ICE that has not been widely covered is they are FORCE FEEDING PRISONERS FOR MONTHS<p>that is recognized as torture and illegal and should never be happening by our government<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;us-news&#x2F;2026&#x2F;aug&#x2F;05&#x2F;ice-force-feeding-hunger-strike" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;us-news&#x2F;2026&#x2F;aug&#x2F;05&#x2F;ice-force-fe...</a><p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pbs.org&#x2F;newshour&#x2F;nation&#x2F;ice-force-feeding-detainees-on-hunger-strike" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pbs.org&#x2F;newshour&#x2F;nation&#x2F;ice-force-feeding-detain...</a>
    • ButlerianJihad21 minutes ago
      You don&#x27;t agree that people in detention should be kept alive and given life-sustaining, ordinary health care? You believe that suicidal people should not be prevented from doing the deed?<p>Weird flex.
      • solid_fuel17 minutes ago
        I hope you have a chance to experience forced feeding, since you seem fine with it.
      • andyjohnson08 minutes ago
        Force feeding is not &quot;life-sustaining, ordinary health care&quot;. Its torture.
      • dcj48 minutes ago
        The anti suicide cult exists inside society out of fear, not out of concern for the individual in question. It is highly immoral.
  • JungleGymSam38 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • 38383838484836 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • 0xy37 minutes ago
    [flagged]
    • VertanaNinjai21 minutes ago
      We must be watching different videos. There is no ramming or fishtailing of any vehicles in that body cam footage. Sounds like another case where ICE has released falsehoods as press releases and then went silent when it fell apart against evidence.<p>Law enforcement is always timely releasing bodycam footage when it shows them in a good light, but if it doesn’t? They wouldn’t even produce the video for this guy in court until after the deadline for discovery had passed.
    • OgsyedIE33 minutes ago
      Your comment is entirely untrue. The video shows a stopped car at rest, and you know this, because you are intentionally spreading falsehoods for the purpose of &quot;flooding the zone with shit&quot;.
      • 0xy30 minutes ago
        Huh? Did you watch the video? Not only do you hear his car revving, but you see the law enforcement vehicle repeatedly shift backwards as he rams it.<p>At 0:45 you see and hear him hit the vehicle, rev and the crunch of him accelerating against it.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latimes.com&#x2F;california&#x2F;story&#x2F;2025-12-28&#x2F;federal-judge-dismisses-indictment-against-tiktoker" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latimes.com&#x2F;california&#x2F;story&#x2F;2025-12-28&#x2F;federal-...</a>
        • OgsyedIE28 minutes ago
          Your comment is entirely untrue. The video shows a stopped car at rest, and you know this, because you are intentionally spreading falsehoods for the purpose of &quot;flooding the zone with shit&quot;.
          • 0xy26 minutes ago
            There&#x27;s video, lol.
    • mkesper21 minutes ago
      Article: In October, Parias was leaving his home and driving down the street when federal agents — including from ICE and the U.S. Marshals Service — used their vehicles to box him in, according to the criminal complaint.<p>Body-worn camera footage captures the ICE officer approaching Parias’ passenger side door and almost immediately stating that he’s going to “break the window.” As the officer smashes the window, the car begins to rev, later sending smoke billowing into the air. The officer pulls out his gun soon afterward, holding it in one hand as he smashes the window at the same time with the other.<p>The complaint alleged that when the rear of the car began to “fishtail,” it “caused the agents to fear that PARIAS may lose control of the Camry and hit them.” A Homeland Security Investigations agent wrote that Parias’ acceleration of the Camry “caused debris (likely rubber being shed from the tires themselves) to fly into the air, which struck some of the agents.”
    • emerongi26 minutes ago
      I don’t see myself shooting someone in that situation. Worst-case scenario seems to be that he somehow manages to break away and drive off. Nobody seems to be in direct danger to me. He isn’t some sort of actively dangerous criminal that needs to be stopped at any cost, so even in the worst case scenario you just catch him some other time.<p>I’m an european. Gun use in US is simply completely normalized. Even if you say that the law allows shooting him there, why would anyone support that?
      • 0xy21 minutes ago
        A vehicle is a deadly weapon. Would you personally accelerate against a police vehicle with active lights that is conducting a traffic stop on you?<p>Accelerating towards law enforcement is a deadly threat.<p>If he&#x27;s willing to threaten them with a deadly weapon, what else is he willing to do?
        • emerongi14 minutes ago
          Well, law enforcement were the first ones to escalate to unbelievable levels of force here.<p>They executed a dangerous manouver, pointed guns at him, broke his window and shot at him. Yes, the person paniced, but I’m not surprised.<p>To law enforcement, this seems like a regular thing they do. They should be in control of the situation and be ready to use the appropriate amount of force for the situation. If they escalate things out of the gate like this, I do not think they should then also be allowed to just start shooting under the pretense of being in danger. That’s a risk they knowingly took by taking the actions they took.<p>You’re saying law enforcement can shoot anyone in the US, as long as they architect situations with the highest level of danger.
    • fedpost26 minutes ago
      Bullshit. I watched the video. The car never moves.
      • RickJWagner19 minutes ago
        You can see it moving, hear it revving, and watch the huge clouds of tire smoke.<p>The social contract says you have to follow the laws our representatives write and our police enforce. A good citizen fights the cops in court, with laws. A criminal flaunts the law and uses a car to try to evade apprehension.
        • fedpost15 minutes ago
          What happens when the courts stop enforcing the law in accordance with the constitution and established ethics?
      • 0xy24 minutes ago
        Lol, what happens at 0:45 exactly? He&#x27;s accelerating against the bumper which crunches and you can see the law enforcement vehicle lurch backwards.<p>FAFO.
        • fedpost19 minutes ago
          Doesn&#x27;t look like anything to me. FAFO flies both ways.