I also think BDD is a really powerful tool for UI acceptance tests! I've now worked on adding it to two AI codebases (one engineered, another vibecoded), and so far it has been mostly positive. Having non-engineers be able to see what effects their code changes have in the UI is nice; and I find having high level API and UI tests is forcing the first layer of cleanup (standardize access to DB through models/services, and a single API SDK).<p>I am also really interested in standardizing the REST interface with typespec, and the database schema with DBML. I think creating these closed-loops with high-level specs is one of the best ways to make an AI project ownable by a team.
The example of “transcibe the initial project discussion, turn that into BDD and that makes the rails to guide the AI is … either brilliant and insightful or a snake eating it’s own tail.<p>I think it has to be worth a try though…
I've been doing that for almost a year and I feel like I'm taking crazy pills when I talk about it, because it works so well.<p>I transcribe most product meetings, turn them into a transcript, run that through an accuracy pass with a bunch of context (mostly vocabulary definitions etc), and use that as a starting doc for generating issues and tests. There are apps that do it fully end to end now I think.
Very impressive that it was done with Opus 4.8.<p>My experiences with Opus have been such that I always max out my Fable allotment but rarely exceed 40% of the remaining limit on Claude.
Yadda 3.0.0 is out. The release modernises the JavaScript BDD library, but more interestingly, it was largely built by Claude Code and points to why executable specifications may become even more valuable in an agentic development world.
"Behaviour Driven Development"<p>I was expecting something on Binary Decision Diagrams. SAOD is worst with TLAs.
This is probably HN's tech background speaking. In the enterprise dev world, everyone knows what BDD means just like every dev out there knows what OOP means.
What is SAOD? Do you mean SOAD?
Being hard here, though:
Purely dismissing it as not being worth of my time due to the example alone.