Hey! As a 46 year old I am offended by this - I am definitely not Gen X. We’re a weird X/Millenial hybrid I’ve seen referred to as Xennials.<p>Also F ZScaler - we use this officially sanctioned MTM attack at work and all it does is make my job harder.
Impressive how many people posting here love the gen [XYZ] categories and feel offended when they are not put in the correctly labeled drawer. ...Shouldn't we move on from this and obsess about something more fun?
you were born in 1980 you are gen x <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X</a> by definition.
But also:<p>> Xennials, also called Xillenials, are a social cohort encompassing people born on the cusp of or during the later years of Generation X and the early years of the Millennials generation.<p>> Many researchers and popular media use birth years from 1977 to 1983, though some extend this further in either direction. Xennials are described as having had an analog childhood and a digital young adulthood.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xennials" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xennials</a>
ngl as a 45 y.o. Gen Y i was not so surprised to read what stupid things 46 y.o. Gen X do
I believe the term is xennial: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xennials" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xennials</a><p>Rare and intersectionally have an unfair advantage.
People on the borderlines often are overlooked. I'm an old GenX, a few years too young to be a Boomer, and even the younger Boomers grew up with a quite different experience than the mainline Boomer generation. And I was already an adult and married by the main part of the GenX era.
You might be Generation Jones: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Jones" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Jones</a>
Dividing generations across decades might work for marketing to them in general, but it's otherwise about as useful as horoscopes and the BMI scale.
Duodecades are superior to decades, and we can take overlapping pairs of duodecades as "generations" to solve the dividing line problem.<p>Duodecades:<p><pre><code> * 1968-1980
* 1980-1992
* 1992-2004
* 2004-2016
* 2016-2028
</code></pre>
Overlapping generations:<p><pre><code> * GenX: 1968-1992
* Millennial: 1980-2004
* GenZ: 1992-2016</code></pre>
The article is unclear: Do they "attack" the GenX managers and encrypt their stuff, or do they simply contact GenX managers in order to get paid faster?<p>In that case, the managers aren't "victims" and aren't "attacked", that would be the company..
Companies hope that training will protect them from cyber threats, while ignoring that their most vulnerable employees are the ones that lost the motivation to care about their job.
> <i>Zscaler says they combine information from compromised systems with publicly available data to map reporting lines and identify the employees most likely to influence a company's response.</i><p>And commercially-available data: enterprise salespeople, for example, can buy this intel from data brokers (directly, or with layered services catering to sales funnels specifically).<p>It's another way that surveillance capitalism can be a national security threat against the US. You have countless US companies collectively mapping out people networks and assembling often intimate dossiers on individuals... and saving international organized crime and geopolitical adversaries a ton of work, which they might not have the resources to otherwise do.
They've learned from how real businesses operate. Ever talked to a salesperson? Notice how much the initial conversation is geared to trying to figure out whether you have any real purchasing authority, and who does if it isn't you?
So why is this only a threat to US companies and not for businesses in other parts of the world?