6 comments

  • doodlebugging0 minutes ago
    I&#x27;m glad that ordinary Mexicans can find ways to arm themselves against the violence of the cartels. I don&#x27;t care that they have to cross the line and do illegal things to preserve their own lives, their families, and their communities. In my life I have worked with many Mexican men and they are some of the funniest, happiest people that I have ever known. They are also the hardest working people that I have ever worked with and many are multi-skilled so asking them to change tasks on a project required no training. They just stepped in and went to work. If those guys went home and found their villages and homes under siege by cartels then I would want them to be well-armed so that they could protect the families that they worked so hard for up here north of the border.<p>Drug problems in Mexico are a result of issues here in the US. Cartels were inconsequential when I was a teenager but gained power as the War on Drugs ramped up. If you are naive enough to believe that smugglers bypassed all those border protections in a cat-and-mouse game against detection for decades then you should understand the reality. In real life it was wealthy Americans and elements of the government who funded the import of drugs across the border using a network of private airstrips and small community airstrips that were unmanned most of the time. Shipments came through when &quot;the coast is clear&quot; and were dispersed across the US with the assistance of local people who were happy to help because they got paid. Many of these people were prominent in their communities and made appropriate donations to political interests which gave them the ability to remain in the background, unmolested by law enforcement, even from the federal level agencies.<p>Many of you young people have spent parts of your lives experimenting with drugs that currently are illegal and wishing that you could just walk into Walmart and buy it OTC. You wish laws would change to make it easier for you to use your drug of choice. Many people my age have been in the background, paranoid all their lives that someone - an employer maybe - would discover that they took a few tokes or got busted way back when and occasionally today. There is too much money in drugs being illegal for wholesale legalization to happen. That business is too big to fail. Those who are benefiting now and who have benefited over the last decades would lose a valuable income stream and all y&#x27;all HN types who spend hours prompting your AIs to create new SaaS apps understand income streams so you know how it sucks to have to conjure new prompts because your old ones flopped or were found to be too predatory.<p>I think as Americans we bear most of the responsibility for the formation of these cartels and for their continued dominance in so much of Mexico&#x27;s economy.
  • tejohnso33 minutes ago
    So you&#x27;re forced to join a gang and fight their rival gangs, or you form your own gang equipped with rifles and grenades ready to commit violence, so that you can fight against joining that gang, or any other gang. Either way you&#x27;re in a violent gang.<p>I guess I&#x27;d rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence.
    • inigyou29 minutes ago
      These gangs <i>are</i> states. We can tell this because they have monopolies on violence.
      • arjie27 minutes ago
        The entire reason there is any conflict there is a lack of a monopoly on violence… The monopoly part is significant. It’s not just “doing a lot of”.
        • threatofrain3 minutes ago
          I don&#x27;t think you need total control, just enough so that you&#x27;re the go-to party for diplomatic and military negotiations in the geopolitical region.
        • gibbitz7 minutes ago
          In this case it&#x27;s like cable TV. Only not a monopoly if you look at the whole country...
        • cucumber37328425 minutes ago
          The conflict isn&#x27;t because of the lack of monopoly. The conflict and lack of monopoly are because whoever as the closest thing to a monopoly is doing such a bad job.
    • monkaiju29 minutes ago
      Not sure its fair to equate a gang fueled by drug smuggling to a self-defense militia.
      • cwnyth13 minutes ago
        Apparently, words can just mean whatever people want, so long as it aligns with one&#x27;s feelings or helps them feel superior to others.
      • inigyou28 minutes ago
        The American government is also a gang fueled by drug smuggling, isn&#x27;t it? But that one&#x27;s considered legitimate.
        • monkaiju15 minutes ago
          Oh yeah, you wont catch me defending the US government one bit.<p>What I&#x27;m saying is a group of people in a community taking up arms to defend themselves is not inherently the same as a drug cartel.
    • crypttales31 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • hereme88811 minutes ago
    About 30% of Mexico is gang-controlled
  • aucisson_masque30 minutes ago
    Mexico has been like that for decades, I believe it&#x27;s top 1 priority for most Mexicans yet it&#x27;s still not fixed. What gives ?<p>At some point when your government is so corrupt, you got to take weapon and organize yourself. It&#x27;s sad.
    • rayiner8 minutes ago
      Many countries are effectively ruled by gangs and cartels. That’s why kings became kind of a big deal in Europe. The states monopoly on violence was solidified back the
    • forinti14 minutes ago
      A characteristic of most of Latin America is that the Police and the Army were created to protect power, not the people, and there hasn&#x27;t really been an effort to change the mentality.
      • gibbitz1 minute ago
        Meanwhile in the US the laws are being changed to protect the wealthy, while the current administration is siphoning value of national assets into their own pockets. The poorer the country, the more likely this is to happen. I wonder how long it will take for warlords to set up shop in Kansas...
  • int0x2933 minutes ago
    These self defense groups sound great until you think about all the problems with vigilante groups. Also they have a history of turning into cartels.<p>That and all things being equal I suspect most of the people in these groups would rather not be fighting.
    • autoexec12 minutes ago
      It&#x27;s not an ideal situation, but since the Mexican government refuses to do its job and protect their people and uphold the law what choice do they have?<p>Right now these people are just doing whatever they can to survive but it&#x27;s just treating the symptom. The source of the problem is the Mexican government who is either incompetent or happy to take bribes to look the other way while their citizens are left the mercy of paramilitary gangs.
      • Thlom5 minutes ago
        What can the government do at this point? We are talking about criminal syndicates with basically standing armies. If the Mexican government goes to all out war it will lead to a humanitarian disaster.
    • e4022 minutes ago
      What choice do they have?<p>This is not your usual vigilante group. This is a reaction to an overwhelming force of criminal gangs killing citizens and the government being powerless to stop them.
    • aucisson_masque29 minutes ago
      What other choice ? Politics are yet to give a solution after decades of problems.
  • Kalanos27 minutes ago
    the real war the US should be fighting
    • hereme88810 minutes ago
      Why should the US fight Mexican cartels? They have their own armies and plenty of ammo.