9 comments

  • sajithdilshan3 minutes ago
    This would turn into a mould infested nightmare
  • AlanYx59 minutes ago
    The claim in the article that saccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer&#x27;s yeast) naturally produced the deep blue color in the butterfly example is not actually true, although it&#x27;s a gorgeous effect.<p>These are genetically engineered variants of brewer&#x27;s yeast designed to produce pigments.
    • Forgeties7943 minutes ago
      Wow you weren’t kidding that’s a beautiful color
      • inigyou4 minutes ago
        You can buy this color for 3€&#x2F;meter at any weekend fabric market.
  • dustfinger55 minutes ago
    I wonder if there is a health hazard wearing this due to breathing in spores or toxins released into the air? Or perhaps there is a risk that the wearer will absorb harmful chemicals secreted by the mycelium via contact with the wearer&#x27;s skin? Very interesting none the less. I have imagined humans making living clothes for a long time, so it is nice to see that idea materialize.
    • svachalek54 minutes ago
      It seems telling that none of the photos show anyone wearing it.
  • funkygibbon27 minutes ago
    I would buy one, but I don’t think I have mushroom in my wardrobe for it.
  • juancn1 hour ago
    How does it smell though?
    • ComputerPerson57 minutes ago
      Most people associate mushrooms and fungi with the smell of their substrate; they commonly don&#x27;t have a strong smell themselves<p>I doubt it has a smell stronger than the wearer<p>edit: this is a bad take, upon further research
      • fluoridation22 minutes ago
        I&#x27;ve done cultures on agar agar and mycelium definitely does have a distinctive smell. To me it&#x27;s reminiscent to the damp smell of a concrete basement, though less stale and unpleasant.
      • _whiteCaps_54 minutes ago
        Chanterelles smell great. I would wear something that smelled like that.<p>Pine mushrooms, not so much.
  • LoganDark8 minutes ago
    Is there a possibility of the organisms escaping the material and infesting the environment? That&#x27;s what I would worry about with mycelium.
  • andai43 minutes ago
    Could they make a house out of this?
  • josefritzishere1 hour ago
    Is there an adjective for something that&#x27;s nifty but also gross?
    • sdellis37 minutes ago
      Blursed!
    • kibwen47 minutes ago
      I&#x27;m not sure it&#x27;s any more objectively gross than normal textile materials. Imagine you lived in a hairless, furless world where nothing like wool was a thing, and then suddenly we discovered a weird fluffy mammal that extruded long fibers out of its flesh; the people of that world might call that gross, we&#x27;d just call it ordinary.
  • chrisjj1 hour ago
    &gt; nutrient solution is applied over a hole, along with a small patch of fresh fungus<p>So, <i>not</i> repair itself.
    • dustfinger1 hour ago
      To be fair it only claimed &quot;near self-repairing&quot;.
      • cestith53 minutes ago
        One could think of it as mostly self-repairing with some outside encouragement.
      • soiltype54 minutes ago
        The headline is more ambitious, that&#x27;s probably what they meant
      • chrisjj42 minutes ago
        Nope. &quot;Dress made of living mycelium can renew and repair itself&quot;.
    • andai42 minutes ago
      Does the fresh fungus need to be genetically identical? I read something about mycelial nuclei in high school and it was weird.
      • fluoridation18 minutes ago
        I guess they&#x27;re just trying to get the networks to interlace, not to reconstitute into a single organism and be capable of nutrient exchange, so I don&#x27;t think it matters if they&#x27;re identical or not.