4 comments

  • stelonix1 minute ago
    Great project! I'm looking for something like this but for code: an app that runs locally and obfuscates variables & strings into generic things, so you don't leak code/db structure to LLM companies. Couldn't find anything though so I'm using an LLM to write one.
  • no-name-here1 hour ago
    Interesting.<p>1. Suggestion: Personally I love when projects mention whether they’ve found other existing software that does something similar, and if so how this app compares.<p>2. On iOS when I click into the project it opens into the GitHub iOS app but there’s a big empty box below the big logo. Clicking the box opens the video in my browser. Maybe it’s a GitHub app issue? I didn’t spend any time further on that.<p>3. Minor but I couldn’t be sure what pisi stands for - the page seems to use “personal and sensitive information” (PASI?) but maybe it stands for “personal information sensitive information” even if the page doesn’t use that phrase?
    • mohamed_am831 hour ago
      Hey, thanks for the feedback!<p>1. Correct. Honestly I haven&#x27;t found any (I&#x27;d use it if I did). After release I was told enterprises have smth similar under the category Data Loss Prevention (DLP).<p>2. It&#x27;s on me the logo is huge, I made it smaller. Video display is better on browser (not desktop app). If you scroll past the big box (the video) you can find the rest of the documentation.<p>3. Spot on, I added the full name to README and made the logo smaller. The name btw is &quot;Personally Identifiable &amp; Sensitive Information Guard&quot;
      • no-name-here24 minutes ago
        It&#x27;s heavier and isn&#x27;t designed as a browser extension, but in terms of existing software for anonymization there&#x27;s stuff like <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;presidio.dataprivacystack.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;presidio.dataprivacystack.org</a> from Microsoft.
  • yason38 minutes ago
    I don&#x27;t understand this, what&#x27;s the point?<p>How does anyone <i>accidentally</i> give personal information to an LLM? Because either you don&#x27;t in the first place (eh, I guess, most people?) or you do but for some specific, weird reason (I can&#x27;t think of any but I guess these exist).
    • frumiousirc27 minutes ago
      It could be useful more as a labor saving device to enable censoring while allowing the human to engage in easy copy-paste. Examples I think of are inclusion of internal DNS names, usernames and human names and email addresses that may be intermixed with log or command output needed to debug some issue.<p>That said, if these strings are really sensitive and I&#x27;m too lazy (or not trusting the human user) to self-censor, I&#x27;d not rely on this particular kind of tool for censoring. I&#x27;d use local LLMs or cloud LLMs where privacy is part of the contract.
  • mangudai54 minutes ago
    [flagged]