5 comments

  • jo-m33 minutes ago
    Basically the inverse of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;daniel.lawrence.lu&#x2F;photos&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;daniel.lawrence.lu&#x2F;photos&#x2F;</a> or <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;trains.jo-m.ch&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;trains.jo-m.ch&#x2F;</a> ;)
    • contr-error10 minutes ago
      The former is in the prior art section at 2:24!
  • slipheen39 minutes ago
    I love this so much! This is such a cool hack, just for the sake of it. Amazing hacking and amazing art!<p>In the preso, she has said the full size output is on the website-<p>can anyone see what that link is? I didn&#x27;t find it on the video page, but I might&#x27;ve just missed it.
    • azalemeth6 minutes ago
      <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;philo.gay&#x2F;linecam&#x2F;gallery.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;philo.gay&#x2F;linecam&#x2F;gallery.html</a> -- it&#x27;s linked within the middle of the talk.
    • contr-error8 minutes ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;philo.gay&#x2F;linecam&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;philo.gay&#x2F;linecam&#x2F;</a>
  • ted_dunning1 hour ago
    It would have been pretty easy to use a horizontal line scanner to get image speed.<p>In any case, it seems that using a full frame video would be much easier to post process since frame to frame correlation tells you everything you need to know about motion.
    • xnx11 minutes ago
      One of the first scripts I vibecoded did exactly this. It works well, but is limited by framerate when there&#x27;s high motion.
    • leni5369 minutes ago
      I&#x27;m not sure that video would have been easier to postprocess. At what fps and shutter speed?
  • lalalandland1 hour ago
    Using the camera as a scanner has a long history in satellite cameras and other aerial photography
  • sciencesama1 hour ago
    they need to connect with the skunkworks team, they solved this problem on sr 71 long time back !